android碎片化新建类_Android并非唯一遭受“碎片化”影响的Google平台

android碎片化新建类

We’ve long heard the word “fragmented” thrown around when it comes to Android, but it’s not the only Google product that suffers from update issues on non-Google branded devices.

我们早就听说过Android会出现“碎片化”这个词，但这并不是唯一遭受非Google品牌设备更新问题困扰的Google产品。

Google has been making waves in the smarthome spaces lately, with Assistant-powered products like Google Home and Home Hub becoming “must have” items for users who aren’t already using Amazon’s Echo devices. Like with other Google products, however, third-party manufacturers can build their own products using Google’s software. For example, several companies have Assistant-powered speakers; Lenovo and JBL also have their own smart displays, both of which are powered by Google’s Android Things.

谷歌近来一直在智能家居领域掀起波澜，诸如Google Home和Home Hub之类的具有辅助功能的产品成为尚未使用Amazon Echo设备的用户的“必备品”。 但是，与其他Google产品一样，第三方制造商也可以使用Google的软件来构建自己的产品。 例如，有几家公司有助手驱动的扬声器。 联想和JBL还拥有自己的智能显示器，两者均由Google的Android Things提供支持。

But as Android Police’s Rita El Khoury points out, not all smart devices are created equally, even when they’re using Google’s own software:

但是，正如Android Police的Rita El Khoury指出的那样，即使使用Google自己的软件，也并非所有智能设备都是平等创建的：

With every first-party release comes a slew of third-party alternatives, boasting the same features, same integrations, same functions, but with different designs and prices. On paper, they should be equal to Google’s, but time and time again, we’ve learned that they’re not.

在每个第一方发行版中，都有大量第三方替代产品，它们具有相同的功能，相同的集成，相同的功能，但设计和价格不同。 从表面上看，它们应该等于Google的，但是一次又一次，我们得知它们不是。

Never though have the lines blurred as much as with the Home Hub and its Lenovo and JBL brethren. They look almost the same, both on the outside and in their interface, and Google pushed them earlier than its Home Hub, advertising them and talking about them as if they were its own. Sadly, the story isn’t different this time either. These are still third-party products and are still going to get updates later than Google’s, suffering from lack of feature parity at almost every point in their lifecycle.

从来没有像Home Hub及其联想和JBL兄弟那样模糊界限。 它们在外部和界面上看起来几乎一样，Google早于Home Hub推送了它们，对其进行了广告宣传和谈论，就好像它们是自己的一样。 可悲的是，这次的故事也没有不同。 这些仍然是第三方产品，并且仍然会比Google的更新晚，因为它们生命周期中几乎每个环节都缺乏功能奇偶校验。

While JBL and Lenovo’s products look similar to Google’s Home Hub on the surface, they lack parity with Google’s product. In fact, they’re not even using the same platform. At a glance, they look the same. They function very similarly and even have a similar interface—but Lenovo and JBL’s products use Android Things, where Google’s Home Hub uses the casting platform.

尽管JBL和联想的产品从表面上看起来类似于Google的Home Hub，但它们与Google的产品缺乏同等性。 实际上，他们甚至没有使用相同的平台。 乍一看，它们看起来一样。 它们的功能非常相似，甚至具有相似的界面，但是联想和JBL的产品使用Android Things，而Google的Home Hub使用投射平台。

To put that even more clearly: Google built a platform for smart displays, then used something entirely different in Home Hub. Thus, a lot of the features that are making their way to Home Hub either will never show up on other smart displays or, if they do, it will be months (or longer) after the arrival on Home Hub.

为了更清楚地说明这一点：Google建立了一个智能显示器平台，然后在Home Hub中使用了完全不同的东西。 因此，进入Home Hub的许多功能将永远不会出现在其他智能显示器上，或者如果出现，则将在进入Home Hub数月(或更长时间)之后出现。

All this is to say one thing: while Google promotes openness and makes its core platforms available to other manufacturers, parity simply doesn’t exist between vendors. This is clear with Assistant speakers, smart displays, and Android devices—and that gap is getting bigger on the daily.

这一切都是一回事：虽然Google提倡开放性并将其核心平台提供给其他制造商，但在供应商之间根本不存在奇偶校验。 借助助理扬声器，智能显示器和Android设备，这一点很明显，而且这种差距每天都在加剧。

For example, Pixel phones have exclusive features you won’t find anywhere else (like call screening and camera features like Night Sight), Home Hub can do things other Assistant-powered displays can’t, and most Assistant speakers still can’t make calls. Hell, this line of thinking even extends to Chromebooks (though to a lesser extent)—the Pixelbook and Pixel Slate both have dedicated Google Assistant keys built-in. The Pixelbook was also the first to get Linux support.

例如，Pixel手机具有您在其他任何地方都找不到的独有功能(例如呼叫筛选和夜视功能等摄像头功能)，Home Hub可以完成其他由助手供电的显示器所无法实现的功能，并且大多数Assistant扬声器仍然无法做到电话。 糟糕的是，这种思路甚至延伸到了Chromebook(尽管程度较小)— Pixelbook和Pixel Slate都内置了专用的Google Assistant密钥。 Pixelbook也是第一款获得Linux支持的产品。

While that may not be exactly the same thing, the answer here is clear: if you care about features and updates on your Google-powered products, you have to buy first-party. While Google’s other products don’t necessarily angle themselves in the same way that Android does, it’s becoming more and more clear that feature parity isn’t something Google cares about when it comes to third-party products.

尽管那可能不完全相同，但答案很明确：如果您关心Google驱动的产品的功能和更新，则必须购买第一方。 尽管Google的其他产品不一定会像Android一样摆正自己的位置，但越来越清楚的是，当使用第三方产品时，功能奇偶性并不是Google所关心的。

翻译自: https://www.howtogeek.com/fyi/android-isnt-the-only-google-platform-that-suffers-from-fragmentation/

android碎片化新建类