“\Ualgocf@original@chapter” undefined when using algorithm2e with natbib

4 down vote favorite 1

Is it possible to just use plainnat without using the package natbib? When I do so, multiple author references don't work too well. I get [author et al (year)auhtor1, author2 and author3] when what I want is just [author et al (year)] Anyway to fix this? If I add \usepackage{natbib} I just get an error: Undefined control sequence. \chtapter ...ace {10\p@ }}\algocf@original@chapter 1.1 \begin{thebibliography}{28} So using plainnat without natbib is the closest I got to get this working. Example: \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{rotating} \usepackage{listings} \usepackage[ruled,vlined]{algorithm2e} \usepackage[ngerman,english]{babel} \usepackage{babelbib,url} \usepackage{breakcites} %\usepackage{natbib} %\usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage{pslatex} \usepackage{setspace} \setstretch{2} \begin{document} \cite{DPS2000} \newpage\pagebreak \nocite{*} \bibliographystyle{plainnat} \bibliography{references} \end{document} It compiles fine but I get [author et al (year)auhtor1, author2 and author3] style referencing and if I uncomment natbib it won't compile. natbib incompatibility algorithm2e share improve this question edited Oct 3 at 17:56 Joseph Wright ♦ 67.5k 4 161 306 asked Apr 4 '11 at 18:20 user4639

Was this post useful to you?

2 Answers

active oldest votes

up vote 6 down vote accepted	The problem is that the algorithm2e expects \chapter to be defined. It makes some changes to how the bibliography is printed which do not make sense. One fix is to do \let\chapter\section before loading algorithm2e: the problem should be go away. share improve this answer answered Apr 4 '11 at 18:44 Joseph Wright ♦ 67.5k 4 161 306
	feedback

up vote 6 down vote

Load algorithm2e after natbib. share improve this answer