Some research questions interested me

1. What're the differences between Intenet of Things and Semantic Web? Are they complements, overlapping or identical ?

2. In a stream reasoning scenario, why continous queries can perform reason? Isn't it reasoners do such a thing ?

- Incremntal maintenance of ontological entailments algorithm[1] does reasoning on transitivity of property in the window. However, it doesn't mention any reasoners invloved during the maintenance process. But I highly suspect that there is a reasoner that lives in the window. 

3. WHY RDF ?

 - The RDF model is based on a traditional persisted-data paradigm, where the focus is on maintaining a bounded set of data items in a knowledge base.[2] 

4. how to realize incremental reasoning ? 

- my question is, is incremental reasoning in stream reasoning system automatic? Is it true that as long as the reasoner is living in the stream reasoning system, the reasoning will be executed always, so that whenever new data arrives, reasoners are constantly providing entailments ? 

5. Why SPARQL is not suitable for RDF streams ?

- Some operators in SPARQL need the whole dataset to process, like distinct, join or sort .

6. How are the reasoners deployed to execute reasoning in parallel ? 

- The authors in this paper[3] proposed a scalable and efficient RDFS reasoning approach by splitting triples according to their predicates. They deploy one Triple-Splitter to distribute triples into three process elements(PE): DomainRange PE, SubClassPE and SubPropertyPE. Each of the PEs can perform RDFS reasoning under certain RDFS rulesets[4]. Since all these tasks are in parallel, the performance can be improved. 

 7. What's the relationship between Machine Learning and Semantic Web? Which is better in terms of what aspects ? 

- A blog[5] points out the challenges of combing machine learning and semantic web, with the statement saying that the ontology merging and maintenance is the way to go. Semantic Web tries to extend the current web by annotating the web of data, to create a "Meta-Web" that is rich in semantics. The ontology plays a very important role to realize data interoperability. Thus, machine learning provides a potential way for us to merge ontologies. 

8. Why RDF needs temporal model? 

RDF needs temporal model to (1) keep historical data (2) indicate the change of status. An example is illustrated in [6]: If John is an undergrate, and then he attends masters. The triple <john a undergraduate> will be break since this statement is no longer valid. <john a master> statement will be formed. Thus the graph loses the history data of "john was an undergraduate" and cannot answer the query of "Was john a undergraduate?". We need a temporal model attached with RDF model to be able to retrieve such time-related information.

Adding time element to RDF has two methods: (1) labeling (2) versioning. Labeling is preferred way because (1) it preserves the spirit of distributed and extensible nature of RDF (2) reduce the overhead in the scenarios where only a little data is updated. (otherwise, creating one version of the graph where little data is frequently changing is time-consuming).  

9. How to realize a semantic reasoner with a programming language ?

- How does Pellet work?

10. understand linked data by examples

- putting the data online is not enough. Publishers need to ensure that data is made available in both human- and machine-understandable formats and is linked to other data.[7]

- Linked Data, a set of four design principles put forward by Tim Berners-Lee in 2006, serve exactly that purpose. Hence, in order to publish Linked Data, publishers should:

  1. Use Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) as names for things, e.g.  http://dbpedia.org/resource/Brussels can be used for referring to the city of Brussels.
  2. Use HTTP URIs, so that people can look up those names.
  3. When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the standards (i.e. RDFSPARQL).
  4. Include links to other URIs, so more things can be discovered, e.g. fromhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Brussels a link is available to http://dbpedia.org/resource/Belgium.

 11. What's SPARQL algebra?

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

REFERENCE:

[1] Barbieri, Davide Francesco, et al. Incremental reasoning on streams and rich background knowledge. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.

[2] https://www.w3.org/community/rsp/rsp-workshop-2015/

[3] Hoeksema, Jesper, and Spyros Kotoulas. "High-performance distributed stream reasoning using s4."Ordring Workshop at ISWC. 2011.

[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-mt-20140225/#rdfs-interpretations -> Section 9.2.1 Patterns of RDFS entailment 

[5] http://www.academia.edu/2542968/A_machine_learning_perspective_for_the_Semantic_Web

[6] Gutierrez, Claudio, Carlos Hurtado, and Alejandro Vaisman. "Temporal rdf." The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. 93-107.

[7] https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/semic/news/understanding-linked-data-example

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/RuiYan/p/4684856.html

以下是对提供的参考资料的总结,按照要求结构化多个要点分条输出: 4G/5G无线网络优化与网规案例分析: NSA站点下终端掉4G问题:部分用户反馈NSA终端频繁掉4G,主要因终端主动发起SCGfail导致。分析显示,在信号较好的环境下,终端可能因节能、过热保护等原因主动释放连接。解决方案建议终端侧进行分析处理,尝试关闭节电开关等。 RSSI算法识别天馈遮挡:通过计算RSSI平均值及差值识别天馈遮挡,差值大于3dB则认定有遮挡。不同设备分组规则不同,如64T和32T。此方法可有效帮助现场人员识别因环境变化引起的网络问题。 5G 160M组网小区CA不生效:某5G站点开启100M+60M CA功能后,测试发现UE无法正常使用CA功能。问题原因在于CA频点集标识配置错误,修正后测试正常。 5G网络优化与策略: CCE映射方式优化:针对诺基亚站点覆盖农村区域,通过优化CCE资源映射方式(交织、非交织),提升RRC连接建立成功率和无线接通率。非交织方式相比交织方式有显著提升。 5G AAU两扇区组网:与三扇区组网相比,AAU两扇区组网在RSRP、SINR、下载速率和上传速率上表现不同,需根据具体场景选择适合的组网方式。 5G语音解决方案:包括沿用4G语音解决方案、EPS Fallback方案和VoNR方案。不同方案适用于不同的5G组网策略,如NSA和SA,并影响语音连续性和网络覆盖。 4G网络优化与资源利用: 4G室分设备利旧:面对4G网络投资压减与资源需求矛盾,提出利旧多维度调优策略,包括资源整合、统筹调配既有资源,以满足新增需求和提质增效。 宏站RRU设备1托N射灯:针对5G深度覆盖需求,研究使用宏站AAU结合1托N射灯方案,快速便捷地开通5G站点,提升深度覆盖能力。 基站与流程管理: 爱立信LTE基站邻区添加流程:未提供具体内容,但通常涉及邻区规划、参数配置、测试验证等步骤,以确保基站间顺畅切换和覆盖连续性。 网络规划与策略: 新高铁跨海大桥覆盖方案试点:虽未提供详细内容,但可推测涉及高铁跨海大桥区域的4G/5G网络覆盖规划,需考虑信号穿透、移动性管理、网络容量等因素。 总结: 提供的参考资料涵盖了4G/5G无线网络优化、网规案例分析、网络优化策略、资源利用、基站管理等多个方面。 通过具体案例分析,展示了无线网络优化中的常见问题及解决方案,如NSA终端掉4G、RSSI识别天馈遮挡、CA不生效等。 强调了5G网络优化与策略的重要性,包括CCE映射方式优化、5G语音解决方案、AAU扇区组网选择等。 提出了4G网络优化与资源利用的策略,如室分设备利旧、宏站RRU设备1托N射灯等。 基站与流程管理方面,提到了爱立信LTE基站邻区添加流程,但未给出具体细节。 新高铁跨海大桥覆盖方案试点展示了特殊场景下的网络规划需求。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值