The relationship of inline and virtual

test1:

base.h:

class  base_c
... {
public:
    virtual ~base_c() ...{}
    virtual int getkind() ...{return 0;}
} ;

class  derive:  public  base_c
... {
public:
    virtual int getkind() ...{return 1;}
} ;

 derived1.cpp:

#include  " base.h "

int  f1()
... {
    derive* pD1=new derive();
    base_c* pB=new base_c();
    int nRet=pD1->getkind()+pB->getkind();
    delete pD1;
    delete pB;

    return nRet;
}

derived2.cpp:

#include  " base.h "

int  f2()
... {
derive* pD2=new derive();
base_c* pB=new base_c();
int nRet=pD2->getkind()+pB->getkind();
delete pD2;
delete pB;

return nRet;
}

> nm derive1.o

00000000 W _._6base_c
00000000 W _._6derive
00000000 W __6base_c
00000000 W __6derive
00000000 ? __EXCEPTION_TABLE__
00000000 ? __FRAME_BEGIN__
         U __builtin_delete
         U __builtin_new
         U __rethrow
         U __rtti_si
         U __rtti_user
00000000 W __tf6base_c
00000000 W __tf6derive
00000008 C __ti6base_c
0000000c C __ti6derive
00000000 V __vt_6base_c
00000000 V __vt_6derive
00000000 T f1__Fv
00000000 t gcc2_compiled.
00000000 W getkind__6base_c
00000000 W getkind__6derive

> nm derive2.o

00000000 W _._6base_c
00000000 W _._6derive
00000000 W __6base_c
00000000 W __6derive
00000000 ? __EXCEPTION_TABLE__
00000000 ? __FRAME_BEGIN__
         U __builtin_delete
         U __builtin_new
         U __rethrow
         U __rtti_si
         U __rtti_user
00000000 W __tf6base_c
00000000 W __tf6derive
00000008 C __ti6base_c
0000000c C __ti6derive
00000000 V __vt_6base_c
00000000 V __vt_6derive
00000000 T f2__Fv
00000000 t gcc2_compiled.
00000000 W getkind__6base_c
00000000 W getkind__6derive

test2

base.h:

class  base_c
... {
public:
    virtual ~base_c() ...{}
    virtual int getkind();
} ;

class  derive:  public  base_c
... {
public:
    virtual int getkind();
} ;

base.cpp:

#include  " base.h "

int  base_c::getkind()
... {
    return 0;
}

int  derive::getkind()
... {
    return 1;
}

> nm base.o
00000000 W _._6base_c
00000000 W _._6derive
00000000 ? __FRAME_BEGIN__
         U __builtin_delete
         U __rtti_si
         U __rtti_user
00000000 W __tf6base_c
00000000 W __tf6derive
00000008 C __ti6base_c
0000000c C __ti6derive
00000000 V __vt_6base_c
00000000 V __vt_6derive
00000000 t gcc2_compiled.
00000000 T getkind__6base_c
00000010 T getkind__6derive

> nm derive1.o

00000000 W __6base_c
00000000 W __6derive
00000000 ? __EXCEPTION_TABLE__
00000000 ? __FRAME_BEGIN__
         U __builtin_delete
         U __builtin_new
         U __rethrow
         U __vt_6base_c
         U __vt_6derive
00000000 T f1__Fv
00000000 t gcc2_compiled.

 > nm derive2.o

00000000 W __6base_c
00000000 W __6derive
00000000 ? __EXCEPTION_TABLE__
00000000 ? __FRAME_BEGIN__
         U __builtin_delete
         U __builtin_new
         U __rethrow
         U __vt_6base_c
         U __vt_6derive
00000000 T f2__Fv
00000000 t gcc2_compiled.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

q1: vitual function 一般会被拒绝 inline化，那么的定义在哪里？

q2: complier一般将vtbl放在第一个没有inline的vitual function的定义得编译单元内，如所有的virtual function都inline了，vtbl放在哪里？