【Mybatis】mybatis原生与mybatis-puls效率比较
背景
- mybatis-plus是近年来最流行的mybatis敏捷开发的插件,提供了简单的crud与条件查询.我们现在就来比较一下mybatis-plus与原生的mybatis比较一下效率问题
- mybatis-plus官网
开始
我们先的有一个工具,能知道mapper层代码的执行时间,这个在我的博客里已经有了.需要的朋友可以去查看【日志】logback 耗时性能监控与使用
代码
- 原生
package com.emodernhy.generator.mode;
import com.baomidou.mybatisplus.annotation.TableName;
import com.baomidou.mybatisplus.annotation.IdType;
import java.util.Date;
import com.baomidou.mybatisplus.annotation.TableId;
import java.io.Serializable;
import io.swagger.annotations.ApiModel;
import io.swagger.annotations.ApiModelProperty;
import lombok.Data;
import lombok.EqualsAndHashCode;
import lombok.experimental.Accessors;
/**
* <p>
* 样本01
* </p>
*
* @author bo.huang
* @since 2020-04-23
*/
@Data
@EqualsAndHashCode(callSuper = false)
@Accessors(chain = true)
@TableName("t_demo")
@ApiModel(value="Demo对象", description="样本01")
public class Demo implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID=1L;
@ApiModelProperty(value = "主键")
@TableId(value = "demo_id", type = IdType.AUTO)
private Integer demoId;
@ApiModelProperty(value = "名称")
private String demoName;
@ApiModelProperty(value = "时间")
private Date demoCreatetime;
}
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/demo")
@Api(value = "样本测试01",tags="样本测试01")
public class DemoController {
@Autowired
private IDemoService demoService;
/**
* 保存
*
* @param demo demo
* @return java.lang.String
* @author bo.huang update
* @date 2020/4/23 2:38 下午
*/
@PostMapping
@Perf4Log
public String save(@RequestBody Demo demo) {
demo.setDemoName("黄波" + System.currentTimeMillis());
demo.setDemoCreatetime(new Date());
demoService.save(demo);
return "保存成功";
}
@PostMapping("batch")
@ApiOperation("批量保存")
@Perf4Log
public String savebatch(@RequestParam("count") Integer count) {
List<Demo> list = new ArrayList<>();
Demo demo;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
demo = new Demo();
demo.setDemoName("黄波" + System.currentTimeMillis());
demo.setDemoCreatetime(new Date());
list.add(demo);
}
demoService.saveBatch(list);
return "保存成功";
}
}
@Service
public class DemoServiceImpl implements IDemoService {
@Autowired
private DemoMapper demoMapper;
@Override
public void save(Demo demo) {
demoMapper.insert(demo);
}
@Override
public void saveBatch(List<Demo> list) {
demoMapper.insertBatch(list);
}
}
public interface DemoMapper extends BaseMapper<Demo> {
/**
* 批量保存
*
* @param list list
* @author bo.huang update
* @date 2020/4/23 2:42 下午
*/
void insertBatch(@Param("demos") List<Demo> list);
}
- mybatis-plus
@Data
@EqualsAndHashCode(callSuper = false)
@Accessors(chain = true)
@TableName("t_demo_plus")
@ApiModel(value="DemoPlus对象", description="样本02")
public class DemoPlus implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID=1L;
@ApiModelProperty(value = "主键")
@TableId(value = "demo_id", type = IdType.AUTO)
private Integer demoId;
@ApiModelProperty(value = "名称")
private String demoName;
@ApiModelProperty(value = "时间")
private Date demoCreatetime;
}
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/demoPlus")
@Api(value = "样本测试02",tags="样本测试02")
public class DemoPlusController {
@Autowired
private IDemoPlusService demoPlusService;
/**
* 保存
*
* @param demo demo
* @return java.lang.String
* @author bo.huang update
* @date 2020/4/23 2:38 下午
*/
@PostMapping
@ApiOperation("保存-plus")
@Perf4Log
public String save(@RequestBody DemoPlus demo) {
demo.setDemoName("黄波" + System.currentTimeMillis());
demo.setDemoCreatetime(new Date());
demoPlusService.save(demo);
return "保存成功";
}
@PostMapping("batch")
@ApiOperation("批量保存-plus")
@Perf4Log
public String savebatch(@RequestParam("count") Integer count) {
List<DemoPlus> list = new ArrayList<>();
DemoPlus demo;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
demo = new DemoPlus();
demo.setDemoName("黄波" + System.currentTimeMillis());
demo.setDemoCreatetime(new Date());
list.add(demo);
}
demoPlusService.saveBatch(list);
return "保存成功";
}
}
@Service
public class DemoPlusServiceImpl extends ServiceImpl<DemoPlusMapper, DemoPlus> implements IDemoPlusService {
}
public interface DemoPlusMapper extends BaseMapper<DemoPlus> {
}
执行save单个保存方法
由此可以看出来.原生的单个保存方法与plus的保存方法差不多效率
执行批量保存方法
一次性保存100条数据
由此可以得出原生的效率大于plus插件的
一次性保存1000条
由此看来,一次性保存数据越大,plus的越慢,这是为什么呢
查看plus源码得到结论
看到这里.知道plus是默认一次性吧1000条数据.一条条执行放入预处理对象中,到最后提交.也就是它是一条一条的插入,最后在整体提交事务的.所以最后作者建议,大批量的保存还是用原生的mybatis