Performance Measurement on ARM

After working mostly with different ARM processors in the 200...400 MHz range in lots of Embedded Linux projects over the last years, we have seen an interesting development in the market recently:

  • ARM cpus, having been known for their low power consumption, are becoming faster and faster (example: OMAP3, Beagleboard, MX51/MX53).

  • x86, having been known for its high computing performance, is becoming more and more SoC-like, power friendly and slower.

If you read the marketing stuff from the chip manufacturers, it sounds like if ARM is the next x86 (in terms of performance) and x86 is the next ARM (in terms of power consumption). But where do we stand today ? How fast are modern ARM derivates?

The Pengutronix Kernel team wanted to know, and so we measured, in order to get some real numbers. Here are the results, and they turn up some interesting questions. Don't take the "observations" below too scientifically - I try to sum up the results in short claims.

As ARM is explicitly a low power architecture, it would have been interesting to measure some "performance vs. power consumption" data. However, as we have done our experiments on board level products, this couldn't be done. Some manufacturers tend to put more peripheral chips on their modules than others, so we would have only measured the effects of the board BoMs.

Test Hardware

In order to find out more about the real speed of today's hardware, we collected some typical industrial hardware in our lab, so this is the list of devices we have benchmarked:

 

 

Link:

http://www.pengutronix.de/development/kernel/arm-benchmarks-20100729_en.html

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值