常用MQ产品的对比_rocketmq官网对比-CSDN博客

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/itScholar001/article/details/135837635

本文详细对比了RocketMQ、ActiveMQ和Kafka在客户端SDK、协议支持、消息类型、高可用性、配置管理等方面的特性，为项目选型提供参考。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

常用MQ产品的对比

本文整理了常用MQ之间的对比，旨在帮助大家在实际项目中选择MQ产品。

消息队列对比参照表

注：

对照表来自：消息队列对比参照表，对比维度比较全面，结果个人比较认同，强烈建议参考。

mq-pk

RocketMQ官方PK

注：

RocketMQ官方和其他MQ之间的PK，表格非常宽，如显示不全，*请点击原文地址阅读*。

原文地址：RocketMQ vs. ActiveMQ vs. Kafka

Messaging Product	Client SDK	Protocol and Specification	Ordered Message	Scheduled Message	Batched Message	BroadCast Message	Message Filter	Server Triggered Redelivery	Message Storage	Message Retroactive	Message Priority	High Availability and Failover	Message Track	Configuration	Management and Operation Tools
ActiveMQ	Java, .NET, C++ etc.	Push model, support OpenWire, STOMP, AMQP, MQTT, JMS	Exclusive Consumer or Exclusive Queues can ensure ordering	Supported	Not Supported	Supported	Supported	Not Supported	Supports very fast persistence using JDBC along with a high performance journal，such as levelDB, kahaDB	Supported	Supported	Supported, depending on storage,if using kahadb it requires a ZooKeeper server	Not Supported	The default configuration is low level, user need to optimize the configuration parameters	Supported
Kafka	Java, Scala etc.	Pull model, support TCP	Ensure ordering of messages within a partition	Not Supported	Supported, with async producer	Not Supported	Supported, you can use Kafka Streams to filter messages	Not Supported	High performance file storage	Supported offset indicate	Not Supported	Supported, requires a ZooKeeper server	Not Supported	Kafka uses key-value pairs format for configuration. These values can be supplied either from a file or programmatically.	Supported, use terminal command to expose core metrics
RocketMQ	Java, C++, Go	Pull model, support TCP, JMS, OpenMessaging	Ensure strict ordering of messages,and can scale out gracefully	Supported	Supported, with sync mode to avoid message loss	Supported	Supported, property filter expressions based on SQL92	Supported	High performance and low latency file storage	Supported timestamp and offset two indicates	Not Supported	Supported, Master-Slave model, without another kit	Supported	Work out of box,user only need to pay attention to a few configurations	Supported, rich web and terminal command to expose core metrics