先看如下代码:
package com.company;
import java.util.Date;
/**
* Created by root on 2017/8/18.
*/
public class waitTest {
private static Object lock = new Object();
public static void main(String[] args) {
Thread thread1 = new Thread(() -> {
synchronized (lock) {
try {
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread1 is running");
lock.wait();
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread1 ended");
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
thread1.start();
Thread thread2 = new Thread(() -> {
synchronized (lock) {
try {
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread2 is running");
lock.notify();
// Don't use sleep method to avoid confusing
for(long i = 0; i < 200000; i++) {
for(long j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {}
}
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread2 release lock");
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
for(long i = 0; i < 200000; i++) {
for(long j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {}
}
synchronized (lock){
System.out.println(new Date() + "thread2 hold lock again.");
for(long i = 0; i < 200000; i++) {
for(long j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {}
}
}
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread2 ended");
});
// Don't use sleep method to avoid confusing
for(long i = 0; i < 200000; i++) {
for(long j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {}
}
thread2.start();
}
}
运行结果
线程thread1开始运行后调用了lock.wait() 释放lock锁,线程thread2开始运行,thread2获取lock锁后,立即调用lock.notify() 通知thread1从wait状态中返回,但是thread2此时没有立即释放lock,而是延迟一段时间,在打印 Thread2 release lock后释放锁,此时thread立即获得锁lock,并从wait中返回打印 Thread1 ended 并结束。而thread2在释放锁后并没有介绍执行,而是在延迟一段时间后,重新获得锁,并直到线程解析完成打印Thread2 ended 。
如果我们在thread2第一次释放锁后立即在获取锁,那么thread还会在Thread2 release lock 之后返回么?
package com.company;
import java.util.Date;
/**
* Created by root on 2017/8/18.
*/
public class waitTest {
private static Object lock = new Object();
public static void main(String[] args) {
Thread thread1 = new Thread(() -> {
synchronized (lock) {
try {
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread1 is running");
lock.wait();
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread1 ended");
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
thread1.start();
Thread thread2 = new Thread(() -> {
synchronized (lock) {
try {
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread2 is running");
lock.notify();
// Don't use sleep method to avoid confusing
for(long i = 0; i < 200000; i++) {
for(long j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {}
}
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread2 release lock");
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
// for(long i = 0; i < 200000; i++) {
// for(long j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {}
// }
synchronized (lock){
System.out.println(new Date() + "thread2 hold lock again.");
for(long i = 0; i < 200000; i++) {
for(long j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {}
}
}
System.out.println(new Date() + " Thread2 ended");
});
// Don't use sleep method to avoid confusing
for(long i = 0; i < 200000; i++) {
for(long j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {}
}
thread2.start();
}
}
此时结果如下:
说明只有当持有lock的线程通知并**释放**lock后,等待线程才能获取锁并从wait中返回继续执行。