Spring源码解析(32)之注解配置的声明式事务处理

一、前言

        在上一节中我们主要是介绍了事务配置文件的解析，我们知道他往容器中主要是注入了一下类。

        这里我们主要介绍如果是注解的声明式事务Spring是如何去进行解析的。以下是实例代码。

@Configuration
@PropertySource("classpath:dbconfig.properties")
@EnableTransactionManagement
public class TransactionConfig {
    @Value("${jdbc.driverClassName}")
    private String driverClassname;
    @Value("${jdbc.url}")
    private String url;
    @Value("${jdbc.username}")
    private String username;
    @Value("${jdbc.password}")
    private String password;

    @Bean
    public DataSource dataSource() {
        DruidDataSource data = new DruidDataSource();
        data.setDriverClassName(driverClassname);
        data.setUrl(url);
        data.setUsername(username);
        data.setPassword(password);
        return data;
    }

    @Bean
    public JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate(DataSource dataSource) {
        return new JdbcTemplate(dataSource);
    }

    @Bean
    public BookDao bookDao() {
        return new BookDao();
    }

    @Bean
    public BookService bookService() {
        bookDao();
        return new BookService();
    }


    @Bean
    public PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager(DataSource dataSource) {
        return new DataSourceTransactionManager(dataSource);
    }


}

public class TransactionTest {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        AnnotationConfigApplicationContext applicationContext = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext();
        applicationContext.register(TransactionConfig.class);
        applicationContext.refresh();
//        BookService bean = applicationContext.getBean(BookService.class);
//        bean.checkout("zhangsan",1);
        BookDao bean = applicationContext.getBean(BookDao.class);
        bean.test();
    }
}

 二、源码分析

        首先来看下对应的@EnableTransactionManagement注解里面包含哪些东西。 

@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Import(TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector.class)
public @interface EnableTransactionManagement {

	/**
	 * Indicate whether subclass-based (CGLIB) proxies are to be created ({@code true}) as
	 * opposed to standard Java interface-based proxies ({@code false}). The default is
	 * {@code false}. <strong>Applicable only if {@link #mode()} is set to
	 * {@link AdviceMode#PROXY}</strong>.
	 * <p>Note that setting this attribute to {@code true} will affect <em>all</em>
	 * Spring-managed beans requiring proxying, not just those marked with
	 * {@code @Transactional}. For example, other beans marked with Spring's
	 * {@code @Async} annotation will be upgraded to subclass proxying at the same
	 * time. This approach has no negative impact in practice unless one is explicitly
	 * expecting one type of proxy vs another, e.g. in tests.
	 */
	boolean proxyTargetClass() default false;

	/**
	 * Indicate how transactional advice should be applied.
	 * <p><b>The default is {@link AdviceMode#PROXY}.</b>
	 * Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through the proxy
	 * only. Local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way; an
	 * {@link Transactional} annotation on such a method within a local call will be
	 * ignored since Spring's interceptor does not even kick in for such a runtime
	 * scenario. For a more advanced mode of interception, consider switching this to
	 * {@link AdviceMode#ASPECTJ}.
	 */
	AdviceMode mode() default AdviceMode.PROXY;

	/**
	 * Indicate the ordering of the execution of the transaction advisor
	 * when multiple advices are applied at a specific joinpoint.
	 * <p>The default is {@link Ordered#LOWEST_PRECEDENCE}.
	 */
	int order() default Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE;

}

        我们知道@Import是导入那个类，再接着往下。

public class TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector extends AdviceModeImportSelector<EnableTransactionManagement> {

	/**
	 * 此处是AdviceMode的作用，默认是用代理，另外一个是ASPECTJ
	 *
	 * Returns {@link ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration} or
	 * {@code AspectJ(Jta)TransactionManagementConfiguration} for {@code PROXY}
	 * and {@code ASPECTJ} values of {@link EnableTransactionManagement#mode()},
	 * respectively.
	 */
	@Override
	protected String[] selectImports(AdviceMode adviceMode) {
		switch (adviceMode) {
			case PROXY:
				return new String[] {AutoProxyRegistrar.class.getName(),
						ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration.class.getName()};
			case ASPECTJ:
				return new String[] {determineTransactionAspectClass()};
			default:
				return null;
		}
	}

	private String determineTransactionAspectClass() {
		return (ClassUtils.isPresent("javax.transaction.Transactional", getClass().getClassLoader()) ?
				TransactionManagementConfigUtils.JTA_TRANSACTION_ASPECT_CONFIGURATION_CLASS_NAME :
				TransactionManagementConfigUtils.TRANSACTION_ASPECT_CONFIGURATION_CLASS_NAME);
	}

}

        可以看到这里主要给我们导入了AutoProxyRegistrar以及ProxyTransactionManagmentConfiguration这两个类，我们先看下AutoProxyRegistrar。

public class AutoProxyRegistrar implements ImportBeanDefinitionRegistrar {

	private final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(getClass());

	/**
	 * 注册AOP处理器InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator
	 *
	 * Register, escalate, and configure the standard auto proxy creator (APC) against the
	 * given registry. Works by finding the nearest annotation declared on the importing
	 * {@code @Configuration} class that has both {@code mode} and {@code proxyTargetClass}
	 * attributes. If {@code mode} is set to {@code PROXY}, the APC is registered; if
	 * {@code proxyTargetClass} is set to {@code true}, then the APC is forced to use
	 * subclass (CGLIB) proxying.
	 * <p>Several {@code @Enable*} annotations expose both {@code mode} and
	 * {@code proxyTargetClass} attributes. It is important to note that most of these
	 * capabilities end up sharing a {@linkplain AopConfigUtils#AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME
	 * single APC}. For this reason, this implementation doesn't "care" exactly which
	 * annotation it finds -- as long as it exposes the right {@code mode} and
	 * {@code proxyTargetClass} attributes, the APC can be registered and configured all
	 * the same.
	 */
	@Override
	public void registerBeanDefinitions(AnnotationMetadata importingClassMetadata, BeanDefinitionRegistry registry) {
		boolean candidateFound = false;
		Set<String> annTypes = importingClassMetadata.getAnnotationTypes();
		// 遍历所有注解，找到有mode和proxyTargetClass的注解
		for (String annType : annTypes) {
			AnnotationAttributes candidate = AnnotationConfigUtils.attributesFor(importingClassMetadata, annType);
			if (candidate == null) {
				continue;
			}
			Object mode = candidate.get("mode");
			Object proxyTargetClass = candidate.get("proxyTargetClass");
			if (mode != null && proxyTargetClass != null && AdviceMode.class == mode.getClass() &&
					Boolean.class == proxyTargetClass.getClass()) {
				candidateFound = true;
				if (mode == AdviceMode.PROXY) {
					// 注册aop
					AopConfigUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(registry);
					// 强制设置proxyTargetClass=true后面使用cglib
					if ((Boolean) proxyTargetClass) {
						AopConfigUtils.forceAutoProxyCreatorToUseClassProxying(registry);
						return;
					}
				}
			}
		}
		if (!candidateFound && logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
			String name = getClass().getSimpleName();
			logger.info(String.format("%s was imported but no annotations were found " +
					"having both 'mode' and 'proxyTargetClass' attributes of type " +
					"AdviceMode and boolean respectively. This means that auto proxy " +
					"creator registration and configuration may not have occurred as " +
					"intended, and components may not be proxied as expected. Check to " +
					"ensure that %s has been @Import'ed on the same class where these " +
					"annotations are declared; otherwise remove the import of %s " +
					"altogether.", name, name, name));
		}
	}

}

         接下来我们看下ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration这个类。

/**
 * 代理事务配置，注册事务需要用的一些类，而且Role=ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE都是属于内部级别的
 *
 * {@code @Configuration} class that registers the Spring infrastructure beans
 * necessary to enable proxy-based annotation-driven transaction management.
 *
 * @author Chris Beams
 * @author Sebastien Deleuze
 * @since 3.1
 * @see EnableTransactionManagement
 * @see TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector
 */
@Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public class ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration extends AbstractTransactionManagementConfiguration {

	@Bean(name = TransactionManagementConfigUtils.TRANSACTION_ADVISOR_BEAN_NAME)
	@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
	public BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor transactionAdvisor(
			TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource, TransactionInterceptor transactionInterceptor) {

		BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor advisor = new BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor();
		advisor.setTransactionAttributeSource(transactionAttributeSource);
		advisor.setAdvice(transactionInterceptor);
		if (this.enableTx != null) {
			advisor.setOrder(this.enableTx.<Integer>getNumber("order"));
		}
		return advisor;
	}

	@Bean
	@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
	public TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource() {
		return new AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource();
	}

	@Bean
	@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
	public TransactionInterceptor transactionInterceptor(TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource) {
		TransactionInterceptor interceptor = new TransactionInterceptor();
		interceptor.setTransactionAttributeSource(transactionAttributeSource);
		if (this.txManager != null) {
			interceptor.setTransactionManager(this.txManager);
		}
		return interceptor;
	}

}

        可以看到这里是一个configuration主要是导入事务相关的Bean信息。

        我们总结一下，xml跟注解方式各自导入了哪些类。

        不知道大家是否还记得，Spring是在哪里解析@configuration这些注解的，他是在一个BPP解析对应的注解，这个BPP就是ConfigurationClassBeanPostprocessor，接下来我们回顾一下这个类的解析源码。

/**
	 * 构建和验证一个类是否被@Configuration修饰，并做相关的解析工作
	 *
	 * 如果你对此方法了解清楚了，那么springboot的自动装配原理就清楚了
	 *
	 * Build and validate a configuration model based on the registry of
	 * {@link Configuration} classes.
	 */
	public void processConfigBeanDefinitions(BeanDefinitionRegistry registry) {
		// 创建存放BeanDefinitionHolder的对象集合
		List<BeanDefinitionHolder> configCandidates = new ArrayList<>();
		// 当前registry就是DefaultListableBeanFactory，获取所有已经注册的BeanDefinition的beanName
		String[] candidateNames = registry.getBeanDefinitionNames();

		// 遍历所有要处理的beanDefinition的名称,筛选对应的beanDefinition（被注解修饰的）
		for (String beanName : candidateNames) {
			// 获取指定名称的BeanDefinition对象
			BeanDefinition beanDef = registry.getBeanDefinition(beanName);
			// 如果beanDefinition中的configurationClass属性不等于空，那么意味着已经处理过，输出日志信息
			if (beanDef.getAttribute(ConfigurationClassUtils.CONFIGURATION_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE) != null) {
				if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
					logger.debug("Bean definition has already been processed as a configuration class: " + beanDef);
				}
			}
			// 判断当前BeanDefinition是否是一个配置类，并为BeanDefinition设置属性为lite或者full，此处设置属性值是为了后续进行调用
			// 如果Configuration配置proxyBeanMethods代理为true则为full
			// 如果加了@Bean、@Component、@ComponentScan、@Import、@ImportResource注解，则设置为lite
			// 如果配置类上被@Order注解标注，则设置BeanDefinition的order属性值
			else if (ConfigurationClassUtils.checkConfigurationClassCandidate(beanDef, this.metadataReaderFactory)) {
				// 添加到对应的集合对象中
				configCandidates.add(new BeanDefinitionHolder(beanDef, beanName));
			}
		}

		// Return immediately if no @Configuration classes were found
		// 如果没有发现任何配置类，则直接返回
		if (configCandidates.isEmpty()) {
			return;
		}

		// Sort by previously determined @Order value, if applicable
		// 如果适用，则按照先前确定的@Order的值排序
		configCandidates.sort((bd1, bd2) -> {
			int i1 = ConfigurationClassUtils.getOrder(bd1.getBeanDefinition());
			int i2 = ConfigurationClassUtils.getOrder(bd2.getBeanDefinition());
			return Integer.compare(i1, i2);
		});

		// Detect any custom bean name generation strategy supplied through the enclosing application context
		// 判断当前类型是否是SingletonBeanRegistry类型
		SingletonBeanRegistry sbr = null;
		if (registry instanceof SingletonBeanRegistry) {
			// 类型的强制转换
			sbr = (SingletonBeanRegistry) registry;
			// 判断是否有自定义的beanName生成器
			if (!this.localBeanNameGeneratorSet) {
				// 获取自定义的beanName生成器
				BeanNameGenerator generator = (BeanNameGenerator) sbr.getSingleton(
						AnnotationConfigUtils.CONFIGURATION_BEAN_NAME_GENERATOR);
				// 如果有自定义的命名生成策略
 				if (generator != null) {
					//设置组件扫描的beanName生成策略
					this.componentScanBeanNameGenerator = generator;
					// 设置import bean name生成策略
					this.importBeanNameGenerator = generator;
				}
			}
		}

		// 如果环境对象等于空，那么就重新创建新的环境对象
		if (this.environment == null) {
			this.environment = new StandardEnvironment();
		}

		// Parse each @Configuration class
		// 实例化ConfigurationClassParser类，并初始化相关的参数，完成配置类的解析工作
		ConfigurationClassParser parser = new ConfigurationClassParser(
				this.metadataReaderFactory, this.problemReporter, this.environment,
				this.resourceLoader, this.componentScanBeanNameGenerator, registry);

		// 创建两个集合对象，
		// 存放相关的BeanDefinitionHolder对象
		Set<BeanDefinitionHolder> candidates = new LinkedHashSet<>(configCandidates);
		// 存放扫描包下的所有bean
		Set<ConfigurationClass> alreadyParsed = new HashSet<>(configCandidates.size());
		do {
			// 解析带有@Controller、@Import、@ImportResource、@ComponentScan、@ComponentScans、@Bean的BeanDefinition
			parser.parse(candidates);
			// 将解析完的Configuration配置类进行校验，1、配置类不能是final，2、@Bean修饰的方法必须可以重写以支持CGLIB
			parser.validate();

			// 获取所有的bean,包括扫描的bean对象，@Import导入的bean对象
			Set<ConfigurationClass> configClasses = new LinkedHashSet<>(parser.getConfigurationClasses());
			// 清除掉已经解析处理过的配置类
			configClasses.removeAll(alreadyParsed);

			// Read the model and create bean definitions based on its content
			// 判断读取器是否为空，如果为空的话，就创建完全填充好的ConfigurationClass实例的读取器
			if (this.reader == null) {
				this.reader = new ConfigurationClassBeanDefinitionReader(
						registry, this.sourceExtractor, this.resourceLoader, this.environment,
						this.importBeanNameGenerator, parser.getImportRegistry());
			}
			// 核心方法，将完全填充好的ConfigurationClass实例转化为BeanDefinition注册入IOC容器
			this.reader.loadBeanDefinitions(configClasses);
			// 添加到已经处理的集合中
			alreadyParsed.addAll(configClasses);

			candidates.clear();
			// 这里判断registry.getBeanDefinitionCount() > candidateNames.length的目的是为了知道reader.loadBeanDefinitions(configClasses)这一步有没有向BeanDefinitionMap中添加新的BeanDefinition
			// 实际上就是看配置类(例如AppConfig类会向BeanDefinitionMap中添加bean)
			// 如果有，registry.getBeanDefinitionCount()就会大于candidateNames.length
			// 这样就需要再次遍历新加入的BeanDefinition，并判断这些bean是否已经被解析过了，如果未解析，需要重新进行解析
			// 这里的AppConfig类向容器中添加的bean，实际上在parser.parse()这一步已经全部被解析了
			if (registry.getBeanDefinitionCount() > candidateNames.length) {
				String[] newCandidateNames = registry.getBeanDefinitionNames();
				Set<String> oldCandidateNames = new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(candidateNames));
				Set<String> alreadyParsedClasses = new HashSet<>();
				for (ConfigurationClass configurationClass : alreadyParsed) {
					alreadyParsedClasses.add(configurationClass.getMetadata().getClassName());
				}
				// 如果有未解析的类，则将其添加到candidates中，这样candidates不为空，就会进入到下一次的while的循环中
				for (String candidateName : newCandidateNames) {
					if (!oldCandidateNames.contains(candidateName)) {
						BeanDefinition bd = registry.getBeanDefinition(candidateName);
						if (ConfigurationClassUtils.checkConfigurationClassCandidate(bd, this.metadataReaderFactory) &&
								!alreadyParsedClasses.contains(bd.getBeanClassName())) {
							candidates.add(new BeanDefinitionHolder(bd, candidateName));
						}
					}
				}
				candidateNames = newCandidateNames;
			}
		}
		while (!candidates.isEmpty());

		// Register the ImportRegistry as a bean in order to support ImportAware @Configuration classes
		if (sbr != null && !sbr.containsSingleton(IMPORT_REGISTRY_BEAN_NAME)) {
			sbr.registerSingleton(IMPORT_REGISTRY_BEAN_NAME, parser.getImportRegistry());
		}

		if (this.metadataReaderFactory instanceof CachingMetadataReaderFactory) {
			// Clear cache in externally provided MetadataReaderFactory; this is a no-op
			// for a shared cache since it'll be cleared by the ApplicationContext.
			((CachingMetadataReaderFactory) this.metadataReaderFactory).clearCache();
		}
	}

        可以看到这里主要是解析了对应的有@Controller、@Import、@ImportResource、@ComponentScan、@ComponentScans、@Bean的bean信息。

	public static boolean checkConfigurationClassCandidate(
			BeanDefinition beanDef, MetadataReaderFactory metadataReaderFactory) {

		// 获取bean定义信息中的class类名
		String className = beanDef.getBeanClassName();
		// 如果className为空，或者bean定义信息中的factoryMethod不等于空，那么直接返回
		if (className == null || beanDef.getFactoryMethodName() != null) {
			return false;
		}

		AnnotationMetadata metadata;
		// 通过注解注入的db都是AnnotatedGenericBeanDefinition，实现了AnnotatedBeanDefinition
		// spring内部的bd是RootBeanDefinition，实现了AbstractBeanDefinition
		// 此处主要用于判断是否归属于AnnotatedBeanDefinition
		if (beanDef instanceof AnnotatedBeanDefinition &&
				className.equals(((AnnotatedBeanDefinition) beanDef).getMetadata().getClassName())) {
			// Can reuse the pre-parsed metadata from the given BeanDefinition...
			// 从当前bean的定义信息中获取元数据信息
			metadata = ((AnnotatedBeanDefinition) beanDef).getMetadata();
		}
		// 判断是否是spring中默认的BeanDefinition
		else if (beanDef instanceof AbstractBeanDefinition && ((AbstractBeanDefinition) beanDef).hasBeanClass()) {
			// Check already loaded Class if present...
			// since we possibly can't even load the class file for this Class.
			// 获取当前bean对象的Class对象
			Class<?> beanClass = ((AbstractBeanDefinition) beanDef).getBeanClass();
			// 如果class实例是下面四种类或接口的子类、父接口等任何一种情况，直接返回
			if (BeanFactoryPostProcessor.class.isAssignableFrom(beanClass) ||
					BeanPostProcessor.class.isAssignableFrom(beanClass) ||
					AopInfrastructureBean.class.isAssignableFrom(beanClass) ||
					EventListenerFactory.class.isAssignableFrom(beanClass)) {
				return false;
			}
			// 为给定类创建新的AnnotationMetadata实例
			metadata = AnnotationMetadata.introspect(beanClass);
		}
		// 如果上述两种情况都不符合
		else {
			try {
				// 获取className的MetadataReader实例
				MetadataReader metadataReader = metadataReaderFactory.getMetadataReader(className);
				// 读取底层类的完整注释元数据，包括带注解方法的元数据
				metadata = metadataReader.getAnnotationMetadata();
			}
			catch (IOException ex) {
				if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
					logger.debug("Could not find class file for introspecting configuration annotations: " +
							className, ex);
				}
				return false;
			}
		}

		// 获取bean定义的元数据被@Configuration注解标注的属性字典值
		Map<String, Object> config = metadata.getAnnotationAttributes(Configuration.class.getName());
		// 如果bean被@Configuration注解标注，且属性proxyBeanMethods为false(使用代理模式)，则将bean定义记为full
		if (config != null && !Boolean.FALSE.equals(config.get("proxyBeanMethods"))) {
			beanDef.setAttribute(CONFIGURATION_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE, CONFIGURATION_CLASS_FULL);
		}
		// 如果bean被@configuration注解标注，且被注解@Component，@ComponentScan、@Import、@ImportResource或者@Bean标记的方法，则将bean定义标记为lite
		else if (config != null || isConfigurationCandidate(metadata)) {
			beanDef.setAttribute(CONFIGURATION_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE, CONFIGURATION_CLASS_LITE);
		}
		else {
			return false;
		}

		// It's a full or lite configuration candidate... Let's determine the order value, if any.
		// bean定义是一个标记为full或lite的候选项，如果设置order则设置order属性值
		Integer order = getOrder(metadata);
		// 如果值不为空的话，那么直接设置值到具体的beanDefinition
		if (order != null) {
			// 设置bean定义的order值
			beanDef.setAttribute(ORDER_ATTRIBUTE, order);
		}

		return true;
	}
	/**
	 * 检查给定的元数据，以查找给定的候选配置类是否被指定的注解标注
	 *
	 * Check the given metadata for a configuration class candidate
	 * (or nested component class declared within a configuration/component class).
	 * @param metadata the metadata of the annotated class
	 * @return {@code true} if the given class is to be registered for
	 * configuration class processing; {@code false} otherwise
	 */
	public static boolean isConfigurationCandidate(AnnotationMetadata metadata) {
		// Do not consider an interface or an annotation...
		// 不考虑接口或注解
		if (metadata.isInterface()) {
			return false;
		}

		// Any of the typical annotations found?
		// 检查是否被注解@Component、@ComponentScan、@Import、@ImportResource标注
		for (String indicator : candidateIndicators) {
			if (metadata.isAnnotated(indicator)) {
				return true;
			}
		}

		// Finally, let's look for @Bean methods...
		// 最后检查是否有@Bean标注的方法
		try {
			return metadata.hasAnnotatedMethods(Bean.class.getName());
		}
		catch (Throwable ex) {
			if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
				logger.debug("Failed to introspect @Bean methods on class [" + metadata.getClassName() + "]: " + ex);
			}
			return false;
		}
	}

        获取到对应注解的bean信息之后并且给这些bean打上标记位。

public void parse(Set<BeanDefinitionHolder> configCandidates) {
		// 循环遍历configCandidates
		for (BeanDefinitionHolder holder : configCandidates) {
			// 获取BeanDefinition
			BeanDefinition bd = holder.getBeanDefinition();
			// 根据BeanDefinition类型的不同，调用parse不同的重载方法，实际上最终都是调用processConfigurationClass()方法
			try {
				// 注解类型
				if (bd instanceof AnnotatedBeanDefinition) {
					parse(((AnnotatedBeanDefinition) bd).getMetadata(), holder.getBeanName());
				}
				// 有class对象的
				else if (bd instanceof AbstractBeanDefinition && ((AbstractBeanDefinition) bd).hasBeanClass()) {
					parse(((AbstractBeanDefinition) bd).getBeanClass(), holder.getBeanName());
				}
				else {
					parse(bd.getBeanClassName(), holder.getBeanName());
				}
			}
			catch (BeanDefinitionStoreException ex) {
				throw ex;
			}
			catch (Throwable ex) {
				throw new BeanDefinitionStoreException(
						"Failed to parse configuration class [" + bd.getBeanClassName() + "]", ex);
			}
		}

		// 执行找到的DeferredImportSelector
		// DeferredImportSelector是ImportSelector的一个子类
		// ImportSelector被设计成和@Import注解同样的效果，但是实现了ImportSelector的类可以条件性的决定导入某些配置
		// DeferredImportSelector的设计魔都是在所有其他的配置类被处理后才进行处理
		this.deferredImportSelectorHandler.process();
	}

	// 根据Class和beanName解析配置文件，有Class对象
	protected final void parse(Class<?> clazz, String beanName) throws IOException {
		processConfigurationClass(new ConfigurationClass(clazz, beanName), DEFAULT_EXCLUSION_FILTER);
	}

protected void  processConfigurationClass(ConfigurationClass configClass, Predicate<String> filter) throws IOException {
		// 判断是否跳过解析
		if (this.conditionEvaluator.shouldSkip(configClass.getMetadata(), ConfigurationPhase.PARSE_CONFIGURATION)) {
			return;
		}

		// 第一次进入的时候，configurationClass的size为0，existingClass肯定为null，在此处处理configuration重复import
		// 如果同一个配置类被处理两次，两次都属于被import的则合并导入类，返回，如果配置类不是被导入的，则移除旧的使用新的配置类
		ConfigurationClass existingClass = this.configurationClasses.get(configClass);
		if (existingClass != null) {
			if (configClass.isImported()) {
				if (existingClass.isImported()) {
					// 如果要处理的配置类configclass在已经分析处理的配置类记录中已存在，合并两者的importBy属性
					existingClass.mergeImportedBy(configClass);
				}
				// Otherwise ignore new imported config class; existing non-imported class overrides it.
				return;
			}
			else {
				// Explicit bean definition found, probably replacing an import.
				// Let's remove the old one and go with the new one.
				this.configurationClasses.remove(configClass);
				this.knownSuperclasses.values().removeIf(configClass::equals);
			}
		}

		// Recursively process the configuration class and its superclass hierarchy.

		// 处理配置类，由于配置类可能存在父类(若父类的全类名是以java开头的，则除外)，所有需要将configClass变成sourceClass去解析，然后返回sourceClass的父类。
		// 如果此时父类为空，则不会进行while循环去解析，如果父类不为空，则会循环的去解析父类
		// SourceClass的意义：简单的包装类，目的是为了以统一的方式去处理带有注解的类，不管这些类是如何加载的
		// 如果无法理解，可以把它当做一个黑盒，不会影响看spring源码的主流程
		SourceClass sourceClass = asSourceClass(configClass, filter);
		do {
			// 解析各种注解
			sourceClass = doProcessConfigurationClass(configClass, sourceClass, filter);
		}
		while (sourceClass != null);

		// 将解析的配置类存储起来，这样回到parse方法时，能取到值
		this.configurationClasses.put(configClass, configClass);
	}

protected final SourceClass doProcessConfigurationClass(
			ConfigurationClass configClass, SourceClass sourceClass, Predicate<String> filter)
			throws IOException {
		// @Configuration继承了@Component
		if (configClass.getMetadata().isAnnotated(Component.class.getName())) {
			// Recursively process any member (nested) classes first
			// 递归处理内部类，因为内部类也是一个配置类，配置类上有@configuration注解，该注解继承@Component，if判断为true，调用processMemberClasses方法，递归解析配置类中的内部类
			processMemberClasses(configClass, sourceClass, filter);
		}

		// Process any @PropertySource annotations
		// 如果配置类上加了@PropertySource注解，那么就解析加载properties文件，并将属性添加到spring上下文中
		for (AnnotationAttributes propertySource : AnnotationConfigUtils.attributesForRepeatable(
				sourceClass.getMetadata(), PropertySources.class,
				org.springframework.context.annotation.PropertySource.class)) {
			if (this.environment instanceof ConfigurableEnvironment) {
				processPropertySource(propertySource);
			}
			else {
				logger.info("Ignoring @PropertySource annotation on [" + sourceClass.getMetadata().getClassName() +
						"]. Reason: Environment must implement ConfigurableEnvironment");
			}
		}

		// Process any @ComponentScan annotations
		// 处理@ComponentScan或者@ComponentScans注解，并将扫描包下的所有bean转换成填充后的ConfigurationClass
		// 此处就是将自定义的bean加载到IOC容器，因为扫描到的类可能也添加了@ComponentScan和@ComponentScans注解，因此需要进行递归解析
		Set<AnnotationAttributes> componentScans = AnnotationConfigUtils.attributesForRepeatable(
				sourceClass.getMetadata(), ComponentScans.class, ComponentScan.class);
		if (!componentScans.isEmpty() &&
				!this.conditionEvaluator.shouldSkip(sourceClass.getMetadata(), ConfigurationPhase.REGISTER_BEAN)) {
			for (AnnotationAttributes componentScan : componentScans) {
				// The config class is annotated with @ComponentScan -> perform the scan immediately
				// 解析@ComponentScan和@ComponentScans配置的扫描的包所包含的类
				// 比如 basePackages = com.mashibing, 那么在这一步会扫描出这个包及子包下的class，然后将其解析成BeanDefinition
				// (BeanDefinition可以理解为等价于BeanDefinitionHolder)
				Set<BeanDefinitionHolder> scannedBeanDefinitions =
						this.componentScanParser.parse(componentScan, sourceClass.getMetadata().getClassName());
				// Check the set of scanned definitions for any further config classes and parse recursively if needed
				// 通过上一步扫描包com.mashibing，有可能扫描出来的bean中可能也添加了ComponentScan或者ComponentScans注解.
				//所以这里需要循环遍历一次，进行递归(parse)，继续解析，直到解析出的类上没有ComponentScan和ComponentScans
				for (BeanDefinitionHolder holder : scannedBeanDefinitions) {
					BeanDefinition bdCand = holder.getBeanDefinition().getOriginatingBeanDefinition();
					if (bdCand == null) {
						bdCand = holder.getBeanDefinition();
					}
					// 判断是否是一个配置类，并设置full或lite属性
					if (ConfigurationClassUtils.checkConfigurationClassCandidate(bdCand, this.metadataReaderFactory)) {
						// 通过递归方法进行解析
						parse(bdCand.getBeanClassName(), holder.getBeanName());
					}
				}
			}
		}

		// Process any @Import annotations
		// 处理@Import注解
		processImports(configClass, sourceClass, getImports(sourceClass), filter, true);

		// Process any @ImportResource annotations
		// 处理@ImportResource注解，导入spring的配置文件
		AnnotationAttributes importResource =
				AnnotationConfigUtils.attributesFor(sourceClass.getMetadata(), ImportResource.class);
		if (importResource != null) {
			String[] resources = importResource.getStringArray("locations");
			Class<? extends BeanDefinitionReader> readerClass = importResource.getClass("reader");
			for (String resource : resources) {
				String resolvedResource = this.environment.resolveRequiredPlaceholders(resource);
				configClass.addImportedResource(resolvedResource, readerClass);
			}
		}

		// Process individual @Bean methods
		// 处理加了@Bean注解的方法，将@Bean方法转化为BeanMethod对象，保存再集合中
		Set<MethodMetadata> beanMethods = retrieveBeanMethodMetadata(sourceClass);
		for (MethodMetadata methodMetadata : beanMethods) {
			configClass.addBeanMethod(new BeanMethod(methodMetadata, configClass));
		}

		// Process default methods on interfaces
		// 处理接口的默认方法实现，从jdk8开始，接口中的方法可以有自己的默认实现，因此如果这个接口的方法加了@Bean注解，也需要被解析
		processInterfaces(configClass, sourceClass);

		// Process superclass, if any
		// 解析父类，如果被解析的配置类继承了某个类，那么配置类的父类也会被进行解析
		if (sourceClass.getMetadata().hasSuperClass()) {
			String superclass = sourceClass.getMetadata().getSuperClassName();
			if (superclass != null && !superclass.startsWith("java") &&
					!this.knownSuperclasses.containsKey(superclass)) {
				this.knownSuperclasses.put(superclass, configClass);
				// Superclass found, return its annotation metadata and recurse
				return sourceClass.getSuperClass();
			}
		}

		// No superclass -> processing is complete
		return null;
	}

         如果bean被@configuration注解标注，且被注解@Component，@ComponentScan、@Import、@ImportResource或者@Bean标记的方法，则将bean定义标记为lite。

        如果bean被@Configuration注解标注，且属性proxyBeanMethods为false(使用代理模式)，则将bean定义记为full。

        我们是ConfigurationClassBeanPostProcessor是一个BDRPP，我们接下来继续看他的

postProcessBeanFactory方法。

	/**
	 * 添加CGLIB增强处理及ImportAwareBeanPostProcessor后置处理类
	 *
	 * Prepare the Configuration classes for servicing bean requests at runtime
	 * by replacing them with CGLIB-enhanced subclasses.
	 */
	@Override
	public void postProcessBeanFactory(ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) {
		int factoryId = System.identityHashCode(beanFactory);
		if (this.factoriesPostProcessed.contains(factoryId)) {
			throw new IllegalStateException(
					"postProcessBeanFactory already called on this post-processor against " + beanFactory);
		}
		this.factoriesPostProcessed.add(factoryId);
		if (!this.registriesPostProcessed.contains(factoryId)) {
			// BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor hook apparently not supported...
			// Simply call processConfigurationClasses lazily at this point then.
			processConfigBeanDefinitions((BeanDefinitionRegistry) beanFactory);
		}

		enhanceConfigurationClasses(beanFactory);
		beanFactory.addBeanPostProcessor(new ImportAwareBeanPostProcessor(beanFactory));
	}

        然后接着往下看enhanceConfigurationClasses方法。

/**
	 * Post-processes a BeanFactory in search of Configuration class BeanDefinitions;
	 * any candidates are then enhanced by a {@link ConfigurationClassEnhancer}.
	 * Candidate status is determined by BeanDefinition attribute metadata.
	 * @see ConfigurationClassEnhancer
	 */
	public void enhanceConfigurationClasses(ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) {
		Map<String, AbstractBeanDefinition> configBeanDefs = new LinkedHashMap<>();
		for (String beanName : beanFactory.getBeanDefinitionNames()) {
			BeanDefinition beanDef = beanFactory.getBeanDefinition(beanName);
			Object configClassAttr = beanDef.getAttribute(ConfigurationClassUtils.CONFIGURATION_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE);
			MethodMetadata methodMetadata = null;
			if (beanDef instanceof AnnotatedBeanDefinition) {
				methodMetadata = ((AnnotatedBeanDefinition) beanDef).getFactoryMethodMetadata();
			}
			if ((configClassAttr != null || methodMetadata != null) && beanDef instanceof AbstractBeanDefinition) {
				// Configuration class (full or lite) or a configuration-derived @Bean method
				// -> resolve bean class at this point...
				AbstractBeanDefinition abd = (AbstractBeanDefinition) beanDef;
				if (!abd.hasBeanClass()) {
					try {
						abd.resolveBeanClass(this.beanClassLoader);
					}
					catch (Throwable ex) {
						throw new IllegalStateException(
								"Cannot load configuration class: " + beanDef.getBeanClassName(), ex);
					}
				}
			}
			if (ConfigurationClassUtils.CONFIGURATION_CLASS_FULL.equals(configClassAttr)) {
				if (!(beanDef instanceof AbstractBeanDefinition)) {
					throw new BeanDefinitionStoreException("Cannot enhance @Configuration bean definition '" +
							beanName + "' since it is not stored in an AbstractBeanDefinition subclass");
				}
				else if (logger.isInfoEnabled() && beanFactory.containsSingleton(beanName)) {
					logger.info("Cannot enhance @Configuration bean definition '" + beanName +
							"' since its singleton instance has been created too early. The typical cause " +
							"is a non-static @Bean method with a BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor " +
							"return type: Consider declaring such methods as 'static'.");
				}
				configBeanDefs.put(beanName, (AbstractBeanDefinition) beanDef);
			}
		}
		if (configBeanDefs.isEmpty()) {
			// nothing to enhance -> return immediately
			return;
		}

		ConfigurationClassEnhancer enhancer = new ConfigurationClassEnhancer();
		for (Map.Entry<String, AbstractBeanDefinition> entry : configBeanDefs.entrySet()) {
			AbstractBeanDefinition beanDef = entry.getValue();
			// If a @Configuration class gets proxied, always proxy the target class
			beanDef.setAttribute(AutoProxyUtils.PRESERVE_TARGET_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE, Boolean.TRUE);
			// Set enhanced subclass of the user-specified bean class
			Class<?> configClass = beanDef.getBeanClass();
			Class<?> enhancedClass = enhancer.enhance(configClass, this.beanClassLoader);
			if (configClass != enhancedClass) {
				if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
					logger.trace(String.format("Replacing bean definition '%s' existing class '%s' with " +
							"enhanced class '%s'", entry.getKey(), configClass.getName(), enhancedClass.getName()));
				}
				beanDef.setBeanClass(enhancedClass);
			}
		}
	}

                可以看到这里就会为我们标记有@configuration的bean生成一个代理对象。

        这里去生成代理对象的目标说是为了解决里面@bean方法相互调用的时候，能够保持bean是单例的，因为比如里面有两个@bean相互去调用，然后可以通过代理类去获取对应@bean标记的类，这样子就能够实现这个@bean标记的类是单例的。