在Android系统中,键盘按键事件是由WindowManagerService服务来管理的,然后再以消息的形式来分发给应用程序处理,不过和普通消息不一样,它是由硬件中断触发的;
在系统启动的时候,SystemServer会启动窗口管理服务WindowManagerService,WindowManagerService在启动的时候就会通过系统输入管理器InputManagerService来总负责监控键盘消息。这些键盘消息一般都是分发给当前激活的Activity窗口来处理的,因此,当前激活的Activity窗口在创建的时候,会到WindowManagerService中去注册一个接收键盘消息的通道,表明它要处理键盘消息,而当InputManagerService监控到有键盘消息时,就会分给给它处理。当当前激活的Activity窗口不再处于激活状态时,它也会到WindowManagerService中去反注册之前的键盘消息接收通道,这样,InputManagerService就不会再把键盘消息分发给它来处理。
点击查看大图
Step 1. SystemServer.startOtherServices
这个函数定义在frameworks/base/services/java/com/android/server/SystemServer.java文件中:
public final class SystemServer {
......
/**
* Starts a miscellaneous grab bag of stuff that has yet to be refactored
* and organized.
*/
private void startOtherServices() {
InputManagerService inputManager = null;
WindowManagerService wm = null;
inputManager = new InputManagerService(context);
wm = WindowManagerService.main(context, inputManager,
mFactoryTestMode != FactoryTest.FACTORY_TEST_LOW_LEVEL,
!mFirstBoot, mOnlyCore, new PhoneWindowManager());
inputManager.setWindowManagerCallbacks(wm.getInputMonitor());
inputManager.start();
......
}
......
}
Step 2. InputManagerService.nativeInit
这个函数定义在frameworks/base/services/java/com/android/server/input/InputManagerService.java文件中:
public class InputManagerService extends IInputManager.Stub
implements Watchdog.Monitor {
// Pointer to native input manager service object.
private final long mPtr;
......
public InputManagerService(Context context) {
mPtr = nativeInit(this, mContext, mHandler.getLooper().getQueue());
}
......
}
InputManagerService构造函数调用本地方法nativeInit来执行C++层的相关初始化操作
Step 3. com_android_server_input_InputManagerService.nativeInit
这个函数定义在frameworks/base/services/core/jni/com_android_server_input_InputManagerService.cpp:
static jlong nativeInit(JNIEnv* env, jclass /* clazz */,
jobject serviceObj, jobject contextObj, jobject messageQueueObj) {
sp<MessageQueue> messageQueue = android_os_MessageQueue_getMessageQueue(env, messageQueueObj);
if (messageQueue == NULL) {
jniThrowRuntimeException(env, "MessageQueue is not initialized.");
return 0;
}
NativeInputManager* im = new NativeInputManager(contextObj, serviceObj,
messageQueue->getLooper());
im->incStrong(0);
return reinterpret_cast<jlong>(im);
}
这个函数的作用是创建一个NativeInputManager实例对象,这样就会执行NativeInputManager类的构造函数来执其它的初始化操作。
Step 4. NativeInputManager
NativeInputManager类是com_android_server_input_InputManagerService.cpp中的内部类,这个函数定义在frameworks/base/services/core/jni/com_android_server_input_InputManagerService.cpp:
NativeInputManager::NativeInputManager(jobject contextObj,
jobject serviceObj, const sp<Looper>& looper) :
mLooper(looper), mInteractive(true) {
JNIEnv* env = jniEnv();
mContextObj = env->NewGlobalRef(contextObj);
mServiceObj = env->NewGlobalRef(serviceObj);
{
AutoMutex _l(mLock);
mLocked.systemUiVisibility = ASYSTEM_UI_VISIBILITY_STATUS_BAR_VISIBLE;
mLocked.pointerSpeed = 0;
mLocked.pointerGesturesEnabled = true;
mLocked.showTouches = false;
mLocked.pointerCapture = false;
}
mInteractive = true;
sp<EventHub> eventHub = new EventHub();
mInputManager = new InputManager(eventHub, this, this);
}
这里只要是创建了一个EventHub实例,并且把这个EventHub作为参数来创建InputManager对象。注意,这里的InputManager类是定义在C++层的,和前面在Java层的InputManager不一样,不过它们是对应关系。EventHub类是真正执行监控键盘事件操作的地方,后面我们会进一步分析到,现在我们主要关心InputManager实例的创建过程,它会InputManager类的构造函数里面执行一些初始化操作。
Step 5. InputManager
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/InputManager.cpp文件中:
InputManager::InputManager(
const sp<EventHubInterface>& eventHub,
const sp<InputReaderPolicyInterface>& readerPolicy,
const sp<InputDispatcherPolicyInterface>& dispatcherPolicy) {
mDispatcher = new InputDispatcher(dispatcherPolicy);
mReader = new InputReader(eventHub, readerPolicy, mDispatcher);
initialize();
}
void InputManager::initialize() {
mReaderThread = new InputReaderThread(mReader);
mDispatcherThread = new InputDispatcherThread(mDispatcher);
}
这里主要是创建了一个InputDispatcher对象和一个InputReader对象,并且分别保存在成员变量mDispatcher和mReader中。InputDispatcher类是负责把键盘消息分发给当前激活的Activity窗口的,而InputReader类则是通过EventHub类来实现读取键盘事件的,后面我们会进一步分析。创建了这两个对象后,还要调用initialize函数来执行其它的初始化操作。
这个函数创建了一个InputReaderThread线程实例和一个InputDispatcherThread线程实例,并且分别保存在成员变量mReaderThread和mDispatcherThread中。这里的InputReader实列mReader就是通过这里的InputReaderThread线程实列mReaderThread来读取键盘事件的,而InputDispatcher实例mDispatcher则是通过这里的InputDispatcherThread线程实例mDisptacherThread来分发键盘消息的。
至此,InputManager的初始化工作就完成了,在回到Step 3中继续分析InputManager的进一步启动过程之前,我们先来作一个小结,看看这个初始化过程都做什么事情:
A. 在Java层中创建了一个InputManager对象,由它来负责管理Android应用程序框架层的键盘消息处理;
B. 在C++层也相应地创建一个InputManager本地对象来负责监控键盘事件;
C. 在C++层中的InputManager对象中,分别创建了一个InputReader对象和一个InputDispatcher对象,前者负责读取系统中的键盘消息,后者负责把键盘消息分发出去;
D. InputReader对象和一个InputDispatcher对象分别是通过InputReaderThread线程实例和InputDispatcherThread线程实例来实键盘消息的读取和分发的。
有了这些对象之后,万事就俱备了,回到Step 1中,调用InputManager类的start函数来执行真正的启动操作。
Step 6. InputManagerService.start
这个函数定义在frameworks/base/services/java/com/android/server/input/InputManagerService.java文件中:
public class InputManagerService extends IInputManager.Stub
implements Watchdog.Monitor {
......
public void start() {
Slog.i(TAG, "Starting input manager");
nativeStart(mPtr);
}
......
}
这个函数通过调用本地方法nativeStart来执行进一步的启动操作,这里的mPtr对象是在前面的Step 3中创建的,是个long类型对象,mPtr指向的是一个本地的InputManager对象。
Step 7. com_android_server_input_InputManagerService.nativeStart
这个函数定义在frameworks/base/services/core/jni/com_android_server_input_InputManagerService.cpp:
static void nativeStart(JNIEnv* env, jclass /* clazz */, jlong ptr) {
NativeInputManager* im = reinterpret_cast<NativeInputManager*>(ptr);
status_t result = im->getInputManager()->start();
if (result) {
jniThrowRuntimeException(env, "Input manager could not be started.");
}
}
这里的im是C++层的InputManager对象,调用它的start函数继续执行启动相关操作。
Step 8. InputManager.start
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/InputManager.cpp文件中:
status_t InputManager::start() {
status_t result = mDispatcherThread->run("InputDispatcher", PRIORITY_URGENT_DISPLAY);
if (result) {
ALOGE("Could not start InputDispatcher thread due to error %d.", result);
return result;
}
result = mReaderThread->run("InputReader", PRIORITY_URGENT_DISPLAY);
if (result) {
ALOGE("Could not start InputReader thread due to error %d.", result);
mDispatcherThread->requestExit();
return result;
}
return OK;
}
这个函数主要就是分别启动一个InputDispatcherThread线程和一个InputReaderThread线程来读取和分发键盘消息的了。这里的InputDispatcherThread线程对象mDispatcherThread和InputReaderThread线程对象是在前面的Step 5中创建的,调用了它们的run函数后,就会进入到它们的threadLoop函数中去,只要threadLoop函数返回true,函数threadLoop就会一直被循环调用,于是这两个线程就起到了不断地读取和分发键盘消息的作用。
我们先来分析InputDispatcherThread线程分发消息的过程,然后再回过头来分析InputReaderThread线程读取消息的过程。
Step 9. InputDispatcherThread.threadLoop
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/InputDispatcher.cpp文件中:
bool InputDispatcherThread::threadLoop() {
mDispatcher->dispatchOnce();
return true;
}
这里的成员变量mDispatcher即为在前面Step 5中创建的InputDispatcher对象,调用它的dispatchOnce成员函数执行一次键盘消息分发的操作。
Step 10. InputDispatcher.dispatchOnce
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/InputDispatcher.cpp文件中:
void InputDispatcher::dispatchOnce() {
nsecs_t nextWakeupTime = LONG_LONG_MAX;
{ // acquire lock
AutoMutex _l(mLock);
mDispatcherIsAliveCondition.broadcast();
// Run a dispatch loop if there are no pending commands.
// The dispatch loop might enqueue commands to run afterwards.
if (!haveCommandsLocked()) {
dispatchOnceInnerLocked(&nextWakeupTime);
}
// Run all pending commands if there are any.
// If any commands were run then force the next poll to wake up immediately.
if (runCommandsLockedInterruptible()) {
nextWakeupTime = LONG_LONG_MIN;
}
} // release lock
// Wait for callback or timeout or wake. (make sure we round up, not down)
nsecs_t currentTime = now();
int timeoutMillis = toMillisecondTimeoutDelay(currentTime, nextWakeupTime);
mLooper->pollOnce(timeoutMillis);
}
这个函数很简单,把键盘消息交给dispatchOnceInnerLocked函数来处理,这个过程我们在后面再详细分析,然后调用mLooper->pollOnce函数等待下一次键盘事件的发生。这里的成员变量mLooper的类型为Looper,它定义在C++层中。
Step 11. Looper.pollOnce
在Looper类中,会创建一个管道,当调用Looper类的pollOnce函数时,如果管道中没有内容可读,那么当前线程就会进入到空闲等待状态;当有键盘事件发生时,InputReader就会往这个管道中写入新的内容,这样就会唤醒前面正在等待键盘事件发生的线程。
InputDispatcher类分发消息的过程就暂时分析到这里,后面会有更进一步的分析,现在,我们回到Step 12中,接着分析InputReader类读取键盘事件的过程。在调用了InputReaderThread线程类的run就函数后,同样会进入到InputReaderThread线程类的threadLoop函数中去。
Step 12. InputReaderThread.threadLoop
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/InputReader.cpp文件中:
bool InputReaderThread::threadLoop() {
mReader->loopOnce();
return true;
}
这里的成员变量mReader即为在前面Step 5中创建的InputReader对象,调用它的loopOnce成员函数执行一次键盘事件的读取操作,关于threadLoop多说一下,当该函数返回true时,则threadLoop会再次调用,当函数返回false时,线程会退出。所以mReader->loopOnce这个方法会一直执行。
Step 13. InputReader.loopOnce
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/InputReader.cpp文件中:
void InputReader::loopOnce() {
......
size_t count = mEventHub->getEvents(timeoutMillis, mEventBuffer, EVENT_BUFFER_SIZE);
{ // acquire lock
AutoMutex _l(mLock);
mReaderIsAliveCondition.broadcast();
if (count) {
processEventsLocked(mEventBuffer, count);
}
......
} // release lock
......
}
这里通过成员函数mEventHub来负责键盘消息的读取工作,如果当前有键盘事件发生或者有键盘事件等待处理,通过mEventHub的getEvent函数就可以得到这个事件,然后交给processEventsLocked函数进行处理,这个函数主要就是唤醒前面的InputDispatcherThread线程,通知它有新的键盘事件发生了,它需要进行一次键盘消息的分发操作了,这个函数我们后面再进一步详细分析;如果没有键盘事件发生或者没有键盘事件等待处理,那么调用mEventHub的getEvent函数时就会进入等待状态。
Step 14. EventHub.getEvents
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/EventHub.cpp文件中:
size_t EventHub::getEvents(int timeoutMillis, RawEvent* buffer, size_t bufferSize) {
ALOG_ASSERT(bufferSize >= 1);
AutoMutex _l(mLock);
struct input_event readBuffer[bufferSize];
RawEvent* event = buffer;
size_t capacity = bufferSize;
bool awoken = false;
for (;;) {
nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
// Reopen input devices if needed.
if (mNeedToReopenDevices) {
mNeedToReopenDevices = false;
ALOGI("Reopening all input devices due to a configuration change.");
closeAllDevicesLocked();
mNeedToScanDevices = true;
break; // return to the caller before we actually rescan
}
// Report any devices that had last been added/removed.
while (mClosingDevices) {
Device* device = mClosingDevices;
ALOGV("Reporting device closed: id=%d, name=%s\n",
device->id, device->path.string());
mClosingDevices = device->next;
event->when = now;
event->deviceId = device->id == mBuiltInKeyboardId ? BUILT_IN_KEYBOARD_ID : device->id;
event->type = DEVICE_REMOVED;
event += 1;
delete device;
mNeedToSendFinishedDeviceScan = true;
if (--capacity == 0) {
break;
}
}
if (mNeedToScanDevices) {
mNeedToScanDevices = false;
scanDevicesLocked();
mNeedToSendFinishedDeviceScan = true;
}
while (mOpeningDevices != NULL) {
Device* device = mOpeningDevices;
ALOGV("Reporting device opened: id=%d, name=%s\n",
device->id, device->path.string());
mOpeningDevices = device->next;
event->when = now;
event->deviceId = device->id == mBuiltInKeyboardId ? 0 : device->id;
event->type = DEVICE_ADDED;
event += 1;
mNeedToSendFinishedDeviceScan = true;
if (--capacity == 0) {
break;
}
}
if (mNeedToSendFinishedDeviceScan) {
mNeedToSendFinishedDeviceScan = false;
event->when = now;
event->type = FINISHED_DEVICE_SCAN;
event += 1;
if (--capacity == 0) {
break;
}
}
// Grab the next input event.
bool deviceChanged = false;
while (mPendingEventIndex < mPendingEventCount) {
const struct epoll_event& eventItem = mPendingEventItems[mPendingEventIndex++];
if (eventItem.data.u32 == EPOLL_ID_INOTIFY) {
if (eventItem.events & EPOLLIN) {
mPendingINotify = true;
} else {
ALOGW("Received unexpected epoll event 0x%08x for INotify.", eventItem.events);
}
continue;
}
if (eventItem.data.u32 == EPOLL_ID_WAKE) {
if (eventItem.events & EPOLLIN) {
ALOGV("awoken after wake()");
awoken = true;
char buffer[16];
ssize_t nRead;
do {
nRead = read(mWakeReadPipeFd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
} while ((nRead == -1 && errno == EINTR) || nRead == sizeof(buffer));
} else {
ALOGW("Received unexpected epoll event 0x%08x for wake read pipe.",
eventItem.events);
}
continue;
}
ssize_t deviceIndex = mDevices.indexOfKey(eventItem.data.u32);
if (deviceIndex < 0) {
ALOGW("Received unexpected epoll event 0x%08x for unknown device id %d.",
eventItem.events, eventItem.data.u32);
continue;
}
Device* device = mDevices.valueAt(deviceIndex);
if (eventItem.events & EPOLLIN) {
int32_t readSize = read(device->fd, readBuffer,
sizeof(struct input_event) * capacity);
if (readSize == 0 || (readSize < 0 && errno == ENODEV)) {
// Device was removed before INotify noticed.
ALOGW("could not get event, removed? (fd: %d size: %" PRId32
" bufferSize: %zu capacity: %zu errno: %d)\n",
device->fd, readSize, bufferSize, capacity, errno);
deviceChanged = true;
closeDeviceLocked(device);
} else if (readSize < 0) {
if (errno != EAGAIN && errno != EINTR) {
ALOGW("could not get event (errno=%d)", errno);
}
} else if ((readSize % sizeof(struct input_event)) != 0) {
ALOGE("could not get event (wrong size: %d)", readSize);
} else {
int32_t deviceId = device->id == mBuiltInKeyboardId ? 0 : device->id;
size_t count = size_t(readSize) / sizeof(struct input_event);
for (size_t i = 0; i < count; i++) {
struct input_event& iev = readBuffer[i];
ALOGV("%s got: time=%d.%06d, type=%d, code=%d, value=%d",
device->path.string(),
(int) iev.time.tv_sec, (int) iev.time.tv_usec,
iev.type, iev.code, iev.value);
// Some input devices may have a better concept of the time
// when an input event was actually generated than the kernel
// which simply timestamps all events on entry to evdev.
// This is a custom Android extension of the input protocol
// mainly intended for use with uinput based device drivers.
if (iev.type == EV_MSC) {
if (iev.code == MSC_ANDROID_TIME_SEC) {
device->timestampOverrideSec = iev.value;
continue;
} else if (iev.code == MSC_ANDROID_TIME_USEC) {
device->timestampOverrideUsec = iev.value;
continue;
}
}
if (device->timestampOverrideSec || device->timestampOverrideUsec) {
iev.time.tv_sec = device->timestampOverrideSec;
iev.time.tv_usec = device->timestampOverrideUsec;
if (iev.type == EV_SYN && iev.code == SYN_REPORT) {
device->timestampOverrideSec = 0;
device->timestampOverrideUsec = 0;
}
ALOGV("applied override time %d.%06d",
int(iev.time.tv_sec), int(iev.time.tv_usec));
}
// Use the time specified in the event instead of the current time
// so that downstream code can get more accurate estimates of
// event dispatch latency from the time the event is enqueued onto
// the evdev client buffer.
//
// The event's timestamp fortuitously uses the same monotonic clock
// time base as the rest of Android. The kernel event device driver
// (drivers/input/evdev.c) obtains timestamps using ktime_get_ts().
// The systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC) function we use everywhere
// calls clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) which is implemented as a
// system call that also queries ktime_get_ts().
event->when = nsecs_t(iev.time.tv_sec) * 1000000000LL
+ nsecs_t(iev.time.tv_usec) * 1000LL;
ALOGV("event time %" PRId64 ", now %" PRId64, event->when, now);
// Bug 7291243: Add a guard in case the kernel generates timestamps
// that appear to be far into the future because they were generated
// using the wrong clock source.
//
// This can happen because when the input device is initially opened
// it has a default clock source of CLOCK_REALTIME. Any input events
// enqueued right after the device is opened will have timestamps
// generated using CLOCK_REALTIME. We later set the clock source
// to CLOCK_MONOTONIC but it is already too late.
//
// Invalid input event timestamps can result in ANRs, crashes and
// and other issues that are hard to track down. We must not let them
// propagate through the system.
//
// Log a warning so that we notice the problem and recover gracefully.
if (event->when >= now + 10 * 1000000000LL) {
// Double-check. Time may have moved on.
nsecs_t time = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
if (event->when > time) {
ALOGW("An input event from %s has a timestamp that appears to "
"have been generated using the wrong clock source "
"(expected CLOCK_MONOTONIC): "
"event time %" PRId64 ", current time %" PRId64
", call time %" PRId64 ". "
"Using current time instead.",
device->path.string(), event->when, time, now);
event->when = time;
} else {
ALOGV("Event time is ok but failed the fast path and required "
"an extra call to systemTime: "
"event time %" PRId64 ", current time %" PRId64
", call time %" PRId64 ".",
event->when, time, now);
}
}
event->deviceId = deviceId;
event->type = iev.type;
event->code = iev.code;
event->value = iev.value;
event += 1;
capacity -= 1;
}
if (capacity == 0) {
// The result buffer is full. Reset the pending event index
// so we will try to read the device again on the next iteration.
mPendingEventIndex -= 1;
break;
}
}
} else if (eventItem.events & EPOLLHUP) {
ALOGI("Removing device %s due to epoll hang-up event.",
device->identifier.name.string());
deviceChanged = true;
closeDeviceLocked(device);
} else {
ALOGW("Received unexpected epoll event 0x%08x for device %s.",
eventItem.events, device->identifier.name.string());
}
}
// readNotify() will modify the list of devices so this must be done after
// processing all other events to ensure that we read all remaining events
// before closing the devices.
if (mPendingINotify && mPendingEventIndex >= mPendingEventCount) {
mPendingINotify = false;
readNotifyLocked();
deviceChanged = true;
}
// Report added or removed devices immediately.
if (deviceChanged) {
continue;
}
// Return now if we have collected any events or if we were explicitly awoken.
if (event != buffer || awoken) {
break;
}
// Poll for events. Mind the wake lock dance!
// We hold a wake lock at all times except during epoll_wait(). This works due to some
// subtle choreography. When a device driver has pending (unread) events, it acquires
// a kernel wake lock. However, once the last pending event has been read, the device
// driver will release the kernel wake lock. To prevent the system from going to sleep
// when this happens, the EventHub holds onto its own user wake lock while the client
// is processing events. Thus the system can only sleep if there are no events
// pending or currently being processed.
//
// The timeout is advisory only. If the device is asleep, it will not wake just to
// service the timeout.
mPendingEventIndex = 0;
mLock.unlock(); // release lock before poll, must be before release_wake_lock
release_wake_lock(WAKE_LOCK_ID);
int pollResult = epoll_wait(mEpollFd, mPendingEventItems, EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS, timeoutMillis);
acquire_wake_lock(PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK, WAKE_LOCK_ID);
mLock.lock(); // reacquire lock after poll, must be after acquire_wake_lock
if (pollResult == 0) {
// Timed out.
mPendingEventCount = 0;
break;
}
if (pollResult < 0) {
// An error occurred.
mPendingEventCount = 0;
// Sleep after errors to avoid locking up the system.
// Hopefully the error is transient.
if (errno != EINTR) {
ALOGW("poll failed (errno=%d)\n", errno);
usleep(100000);
}
} else {
// Some events occurred.
mPendingEventCount = size_t(pollResult);
}
}
// All done, return the number of events we read.
return event - buffer;
}
这个函数比较长,我们一步一步来分析。
首先,如果是第一次进入到这个函数中时,成员变量mNeedToReopenDevices和mClosingDevices的值均为false,mNeedToScanDevices值为true,如果不是第一次进入到这个函数,那么就会分析当前有没有输入事件发生,如果有,就返回这个事件,否则就会进入等待状态,等待下一次输入事件的发生。在我们这个场景中,就是等待下一次键盘事件的发生了。
我们先分析scanDevicesLocked函数的实现,然后回过头来分析这个getEvent函数的具体的实现。
Step 14. EventHub.scanDevicesLocked
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/EventHub.cpp文件中:
void EventHub::scanDevicesLocked() {
status_t res = scanDirLocked(DEVICE_PATH);
if(res < 0) {
ALOGE("scan dir failed for %s\n", DEVICE_PATH);
}
if (mDevices.indexOfKey(VIRTUAL_KEYBOARD_ID) < 0) {
createVirtualKeyboardLocked();
}
}
这个函数主要是扫描device_path目录下的设备文件,然后打开它们,这里的变量DEVICE_PATH定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/EventHub.cpp文件开始的地方:
static const char *DEVICE_PATH = “/dev/input”;
在设备目录/dev/input中,一般有11个设备文件存在,分别是event0、event1、event2、event3、event4、event5、event6、event7、event8、mice和mouse0设备文件,其中,键盘事件就包含在event0设备文件中了。
Step 15. EventHub.scanDirLocked
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/EventHub.cpp文件中:
status_t EventHub::scanDirLocked(const char *dirname)
{
char devname[PATH_MAX];
char *filename;
DIR *dir;
struct dirent *de;
dir = opendir(dirname);
if(dir == NULL)
return -1;
strcpy(devname, dirname);
filename = devname + strlen(devname);
*filename++ = '/';
while((de = readdir(dir))) {
if(de->d_name[0] == '.' &&
(de->d_name[1] == '\0' ||
(de->d_name[1] == '.' && de->d_name[2] == '\0')))
continue;
strcpy(filename, de->d_name);
openDeviceLocked(devname);
}
closedir(dir);
return 0;
}
根据上面一步的分析,这个函数主要就是调用openDevice函数来分别打开/dev/input/event0、/dev/input/event1、/dev/input/event2、/dev/input/event3、/dev/input/event4、/dev/input/event5、/dev/input/event6、/dev/input/event7、/dev/input/event8、/dev/input/mice和/dev/input/mouse0这11个设备文件了。
Step 16. EventHub.openDeviceLocked
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/EventHub.cpp文件中:
status_t EventHub::openDeviceLocked(const char *devicePath) {
......
Device* device = new Device(fd, deviceId, String8(devicePath), identifier);
addDeviceLocked(device);
return OK;
}
函数创建了一个Device对象,Device类负责记录管理一个具体的输入设备。Device类里面主要包含设备信息如下:
-
fd : int //设备节点所打开的文件句柄
-
identifier : const InputDeviceIdentifier //记录厂商信息,存储了设备的供应商、型号等信息
-
keyBitmask[] : uint8_t
-
configurationFile : String8 //IDC文件名
-
configuration : PropertyMap* //IDC属性:(内嵌OR外接)设备
-
keyMap : KeyMap //保存配置文件(kl,kcm)
接下来看下addDeviceLocked函数。
void EventHub::addDeviceLocked(Device* device) {
mDevices.add(device->id, device);
device->next = mOpeningDevices;
mOpeningDevices = device;
}
通过addDeviceLocked函数将新创建的Device对象加到mDevices中,并将device的id作为键值存进去。mDevices用于存储多个输入设备,后续可以通过device的id从mDevices里面获取到对应的Device设备。
Step 17. EventHub.addDeviceLocked
这个函数定义在frameworks/native/services/inputflinger/EventHub.cpp文件中:
void EventHub::addDeviceLocked(Device* device) {
mDevices.add(device->id, device);
device->next = mOpeningDevices;
mOpeningDevices = device;
}
到这里,系统中的输入设备文件就打开了。回到Step 14中,我们继续分析EventHub.getEvents函数的实现。在中间的for循环里面,接下来检查当前是否有新的输入设备加入进来:
while (mOpeningDevices != NULL) {
Device* device = mOpeningDevices;
ALOGV("Reporting device opened: id=%d, name=%s\n",
device->id, device->path.string());
mOpeningDevices = device->next;
event->when = now;
event->deviceId = device->id == mBuiltInKeyboardId ? 0 : device->id;
event->type = DEVICE_ADDED;
event += 1;
mNeedToSendFinishedDeviceScan = true;
if (--capacity == 0) {
break;
}
}
接着,再检查是否需要结束监控输入事件:
if (mNeedToSendFinishedDeviceScan) {
mNeedToSendFinishedDeviceScan = false;
event->when = now;
event->type = FINISHED_DEVICE_SCAN;
event += 1;
if (--capacity == 0) {
break;
}
}
最后,就是要检查当前是否有还未处理的输入设备事件发生了:
// Grab the next input event.
bool deviceChanged = false;
while (mPendingEventIndex < mPendingEventCount) {
const struct epoll_event& eventItem = mPendingEventItems[mPendingEventIndex++];
if (eventItem.data.u32 == EPOLL_ID_INOTIFY) {
if (eventItem.events & EPOLLIN) {
mPendingINotify = true;
} else {
ALOGW("Received unexpected epoll event 0x%08x for INotify.", eventItem.events);
}
continue;
}
if (eventItem.data.u32 == EPOLL_ID_WAKE) {
if (eventItem.events & EPOLLIN) {
ALOGV("awoken after wake()");
awoken = true;
char buffer[16];
ssize_t nRead;
do {
nRead = read(mWakeReadPipeFd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
} while ((nRead == -1 && errno == EINTR) || nRead == sizeof(buffer));
} else {
ALOGW("Received unexpected epoll event 0x%08x for wake read pipe.",
eventItem.events);
}
continue;
}
ssize_t deviceIndex = mDevices.indexOfKey(eventItem.data.u32);
if (deviceIndex < 0) {
ALOGW("Received unexpected epoll event 0x%08x for unknown device id %d.",
eventItem.events, eventItem.data.u32);
continue;
}
Device* device = mDevices.valueAt(deviceIndex);
if (eventItem.events & EPOLLIN) {
int32_t readSize = read(device->fd, readBuffer,
sizeof(struct input_event) * capacity);
if (readSize == 0 || (readSize < 0 && errno == ENODEV)) {
// Device was removed before INotify noticed.
ALOGW("could not get event, removed? (fd: %d size: %" PRId32
" bufferSize: %zu capacity: %zu errno: %d)\n",
device->fd, readSize, bufferSize, capacity, errno);
deviceChanged = true;
closeDeviceLocked(device);
} else if (readSize < 0) {
if (errno != EAGAIN && errno != EINTR) {
ALOGW("could not get event (errno=%d)", errno);
}
} else if ((readSize % sizeof(struct input_event)) != 0) {
ALOGE("could not get event (wrong size: %d)", readSize);
} else {
int32_t deviceId = device->id == mBuiltInKeyboardId ? 0 : device->id;
size_t count = size_t(readSize) / sizeof(struct input_event);
for (size_t i = 0; i < count; i++) {
struct input_event& iev = readBuffer[i];
ALOGV("%s got: time=%d.%06d, type=%d, code=%d, value=%d",
device->path.string(),
(int) iev.time.tv_sec, (int) iev.time.tv_usec,
iev.type, iev.code, iev.value);
// Some input devices may have a better concept of the time
// when an input event was actually generated than the kernel
// which simply timestamps all events on entry to evdev.
// This is a custom Android extension of the input protocol
// mainly intended for use with uinput based device drivers.
if (iev.type == EV_MSC) {
if (iev.code == MSC_ANDROID_TIME_SEC) {
device->timestampOverrideSec = iev.value;
continue;
} else if (iev.code == MSC_ANDROID_TIME_USEC) {
device->timestampOverrideUsec = iev.value;
continue;
}
}
if (device->timestampOverrideSec || device->timestampOverrideUsec) {
iev.time.tv_sec = device->timestampOverrideSec;
iev.time.tv_usec = device->timestampOverrideUsec;
if (iev.type == EV_SYN && iev.code == SYN_REPORT) {
device->timestampOverrideSec = 0;
device->timestampOverrideUsec = 0;
}
ALOGV("applied override time %d.%06d",
int(iev.time.tv_sec), int(iev.time.tv_usec));
}
// Use the time specified in the event instead of the current time
// so that downstream code can get more accurate estimates of
// event dispatch latency from the time the event is enqueued onto
// the evdev client buffer.
//
// The event's timestamp fortuitously uses the same monotonic clock
// time base as the rest of Android. The kernel event device driver
// (drivers/input/evdev.c) obtains timestamps using ktime_get_ts().
// The systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC) function we use everywhere
// calls clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) which is implemented as a
// system call that also queries ktime_get_ts().
event->when = nsecs_t(iev.time.tv_sec) * 1000000000LL
+ nsecs_t(iev.time.tv_usec) * 1000LL;
ALOGV("event time %" PRId64 ", now %" PRId64, event->when, now);
// Bug 7291243: Add a guard in case the kernel generates timestamps
// that appear to be far into the future because they were generated
// using the wrong clock source.
//
// This can happen because when the input device is initially opened
// it has a default clock source of CLOCK_REALTIME. Any input events
// enqueued right after the device is opened will have timestamps
// generated using CLOCK_REALTIME. We later set the clock source
// to CLOCK_MONOTONIC but it is already too late.
//
// Invalid input event timestamps can result in ANRs, crashes and
// and other issues that are hard to track down. We must not let them
// propagate through the system.
//
// Log a warning so that we notice the problem and recover gracefully.
if (event->when >= now + 10 * 1000000000LL) {
// Double-check. Time may have moved on.
nsecs_t time = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
if (event->when > time) {
ALOGW("An input event from %s has a timestamp that appears to "
"have been generated using the wrong clock source "
"(expected CLOCK_MONOTONIC): "
"event time %" PRId64 ", current time %" PRId64
", call time %" PRId64 ". "
"Using current time instead.",
device->path.string(), event->when, time, now);
event->when = time;
} else {
ALOGV("Event time is ok but failed the fast path and required "
"an extra call to systemTime: "
"event time %" PRId64 ", current time %" PRId64
", call time %" PRId64 ".",
event->when, time, now);
}
}
event->deviceId = deviceId;
event->type = iev.type;
event->code = iev.code;
event->value = iev.value;
event += 1;
capacity -= 1;
}
if (capacity == 0) {
// The result buffer is full. Reset the pending event index
// so we will try to read the device again on the next iteration.
mPendingEventIndex -= 1;
break;
}
}
} else if (eventItem.events & EPOLLHUP) {
ALOGI("Removing device %s due to epoll hang-up event.",
device->identifier.name.string());
deviceChanged = true;
closeDeviceLocked(device);
} else {
ALOGW("Received unexpected epoll event 0x%08x for device %s.",
eventItem.events, device->identifier.name.string());
}
}
未处理的输入事件保存在成员变量mPendingEventItems中,如果mPendingEventIndex < mPendingEventCount,说明存在待处理的输入事件,接下来就会进入while循环处理这些输入事件,直到所有事件处理完成。如果没有,就要通过系统调用epoll_wait来等待输入设备上发生新的事件了,在我们这个场景中,就是等待键盘按键被按下或者松开了。
int pollResult = epoll_wait(mEpollFd, mPendingEventItems, EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS, timeoutMillis);
利用epoll_wait函数来监听looper上的event,一旦有event发生,其eventCount就会回传event的数目。假若在最后一个参数指定的timeoutMillis内都没有事件发生, 其eventCount就会回传0, 若有发生错误回传-1。由 EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS 的定义值可以知道, 所监听到的event数最多为16个event。这里的mEpollFd包含了我们所要监控的输入设备的打开文件描述符,这是在前面的scanDirLocked函数中初始化的。
Step 18. epoll_wait
这是一个Linux系统的文件操作系统调用,它用来查询指定的文件列表是否有有可读写的,如果有,就马上返回,否则的话,就阻塞线程,并等待驱动程序唤醒,重新调用poll函数,或超时返回。在我们的这个场景中,就是要查询是否有键盘事件发生,如果有的话,就返回,否则的话,当前线程就睡眠等待键盘事件的发生了。
这样,InputManager的启动过程就分析完了,下面我们会再分析应用程序注册键盘消息接收通道的过程。