google group dcmtk c# wrapper

 

Opensource DICOM toolkit in .NET

Options

There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
Standard view   View as tree Proportional text   Fixed text

7 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)

The group you are posting to is a Usenet group . Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.

Your reply message has not been sent.

Your post was successful

Cancel

Send   Discard
From: To : Cc: Followup To: Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject Subject:
Validation: For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon.
Send   Discard

Sri   View profile    More options Dec 23 2010, 10:07 am Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom From: Sri <sridharr... @gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:07:12 -0800 (PST) Local: Thurs, Dec 23 2010 10:07 am Subject: Opensource DICOM toolkit in .NET Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author Hello, I have been using dcmtk for a while in C++ however am looking for open- source DICOM toolkit in .NET. Any suggestions? I also came to know about about ClearCanvas - Could users share about their experiences? How good is ClearCanvas for comunication (MPPS, Q/ R, Store) & SR support? Additionally, do you have experience porting dcmtk to .net using managed C++? Did you face any problems? Your comments are highly appreciated, thank you, Sri     Forward    You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group . Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.

Mahesh   View profile    More options Dec 23 2010, 9:37 pm Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom From: Mahesh <mdube... @gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:37:05 -0800 (PST) Local: Thurs, Dec 23 2010 9:37 pm Subject: Re: Opensource DICOM toolkit in .NET Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author On Dec 23, 7:07 am, Sri <sridharr ... @gmail.com> wrote:   > Hello, > I have been using dcmtk for a while in C++ however am looking for open- > source DICOM toolkit in .NET. Any suggestions? > I also came to know about about ClearCanvas - Could users share about > their experiences? How good is ClearCanvas for comunication (MPPS, Q/ > R, Store) & SR support? > Additionally, do you have experience porting dcmtk to .net using > managed C++? Did you face any problems? Your comments are highly > appreciated, thank you, > Sri Hello;         dcmtk  one of the best  library for dicom. I had created managed wrapper some time back for dcmtk using swig http://www.swig.org/ and it works very well. There are also other open source library purely in .Net. mDCM - https://github.com/rcd/mdcm Regards Mahesh     Forward    You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group . Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.

Sri   View profile    More options Dec 26 2010, 1:38 am Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom From: Sri <sridharr... @gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:38:54 -0800 (PST) Local: Sun, Dec 26 2010 1:38 am Subject: Re: Opensource DICOM toolkit in .NET Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author Hi Mahesh, Thanks for your points, Looks like ClearCanvas tool uses mDCM lib internally, have you tried using mDCM? Could you share your experience? that would be great. Regards, Sridhar On Dec 23, 8:37 am, Mahesh <mdube... @gmail.com> wrote: - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > On Dec 23, 7:07 am, Sri <sridharr ... @gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been using dcmtk for a while in C++ however am looking for open- > > source DICOM toolkit in .NET. Any suggestions? > > I also came to know about about ClearCanvas - Could users share about > > their experiences? How good is ClearCanvas for comunication (MPPS, Q/ > > R, Store) & SR support? > > Additionally, do you have experience porting dcmtk to .net using > > managed C++? Did you face any problems? Your comments are highly > > appreciated, thank you, > > Sri > Hello; >         dcmtk  one of the best  library for dicom. I had created > managed wrapper some time back for dcmtk using swighttp://www.swig.org/ > and it works very well. > There are also other open source library purely in .Net. > mDCM -https://github.com/rcd/mdcm > Regards > Mahesh     Forward    You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group . Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.

Mahesh   View profile    More options Dec 27 2010, 2:22 pm Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom From: Mahesh <mdube... @gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:22:38 -0800 (PST) Local: Mon, Dec 27 2010 2:22 pm Subject: Re: Opensource DICOM toolkit in .NET Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author Hello;           mDCM is a dicom implementation in .Net. I am using this library from long time and it works very well :) There is no direct support for MPPS and SR , but it is not difficult to code these features using mDCM.  For any specific   question on mDCM you can post your query on mDCM group ( http://groups.google.com/group/mdcm ) Regards Mahesh On Dec 25, 10:38 pm, Sri <sridharr... @gmail.com> wrote: - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > Hi Mahesh, > Thanks for your points, Looks like ClearCanvas tool uses mDCM lib > internally, have you tried using mDCM? Could you share your > experience? that would be great. > Regards, > Sridhar > On Dec 23, 8:37 am, Mahesh <mdube... @gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 23, 7:07 am, Sri <sridharr... @gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I have been using dcmtk for a while in C++ however am looking for open- > > > source DICOM toolkit in .NET. Any suggestions? > > > I also came to know about about ClearCanvas - Could users share about > > > their experiences? How good is ClearCanvas for comunication (MPPS, Q/ > > > R, Store) & SR support? > > > Additionally, do you have experience porting dcmtk to .net using > > > managed C++? Did you face any problems? Your comments are highly > > > appreciated, thank you, > > > Sri > > Hello; > >         dcmtk  one of the best  library for dicom. I had created > > managed wrapper some time back for dcmtk using swighttp://www.swig.org/ > > and it works very well. > > There are also other open source library purely in .Net. > > mDCM -https://github.com/rcd/mdcm > > Regards > > Mahesh     Forward    You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group . Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.

Mathieu Malaterre   View profile    More options Dec 27 2010, 4:59 pm Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom From: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malate... @gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:59:07 -0800 (PST) Local: Mon, Dec 27 2010 4:59 pm Subject: Re: Opensource DICOM toolkit in .NET Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author On Dec 23, 3:07 am, Sri <sridharr ... @gmail.com> wrote:   > Hello, > I have been using dcmtk for a while in C++ however am looking for open- > source DICOM toolkit in .NET. Any suggestions? Try GDCM. It is wrapped to Python, Java and C# currently (using SWIG). HTH Ref: http://gdcm.sf.net     Forward    You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group . Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.

Suresh Viswanathan   View profile    More options Jan 1, 8:15 pm Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom From: Suresh Viswanathan <sureshkuma... @gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 04:15:44 -0800 (PST) Local: Sat, Jan 1 2011 8:15 pm Subject: Re: Opensource DICOM toolkit in .NET Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author On Dec 23 2010, 7:07 am, Sri <sridharr ... @gmail.com> wrote:   > Hello, > I have been using dcmtk for a while in C++ however am looking for open- > source DICOM toolkit in .NET. Any suggestions? > I also came to know about about ClearCanvas - Could users share about > their experiences? How good is ClearCanvas for comunication (MPPS, Q/ > R, Store) & SR support? > Additionally, do you have experience porting dcmtk to .net using > managed C++? Did you face any problems? Your comments are highly > appreciated, thank you, > Sri My company uses the Clear Canvas SDK for a lot of development work and it has turned out really well. I would recommend it as a very good open source alternative. Suresh     Forward    You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group . Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.

Rady   View profile    More options Jan 2, 6:35 am Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dicom From: Rady <radywo... @gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 14:35:02 -0800 (PST) Local: Sun, Jan 2 2011 6:35 am Subject: Re: Opensource DICOM toolkit in .NET Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author We are also using Clearcanvas extensively for the last 2 years. It is one of the best implementation of DICOM Standards in .Net and Open Source. Their support is also relatively fast, you can use their forums. There is no direct MPPS or MWL implementation, but building them should not be a problem. If you need any info please let us know. with regards Ravindran Padmanabhan. Pellucid. On Jan 1, 5:15 pm, Suresh Viswanathan <sureshkuma... @gmail.com> wrote: - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -