CWnd Derived MFC Objects and Multi-threaded Applications

SUMMARY

In a multi-threaded application written using MFC, you should not pass MFC objects across thread boundaries. As a general rule, a thread should access only those MFC objects that it creates. Failure to do so may cause run-time problems including assertions or unexpected program behavior.

MORE INFORMATION

In a Win32 process, all the threads running in the process address space can view all global and static data. A thread can use thread-local-storage (TLS) to store any thread-specific data.

In a multi-threaded environment because windows are owned by threads, MFC keeps the temporary and permanent window handle map in thread local storage. The same is true for other handle maps like those for GDI objects and device contexts. Keeping the window handle maps in thread local storage ensures protection against simultaneous access by several threads.

The behavior of the functions CHandleMap::LookupPermanent() and CHandleMap::LookupTemporary() is a direct consequence of these facts. Given a window handle, these functions check the permanent and temporary window handle maps of the current thread for the existence of an associated CWnd derived MFC object. This means that if calls to these functions are made from a thread to search for MFC objects that represent windows created in other threads, these calls will fail.

There are several functions that call CHandleMap::LookupPermanent() and CHandleMap::LookupTemporary(). CWnd::AssertValid() (and hence the macro ASSERT_VALID for a CWnd object) is one such function. This function is called to make validity checks on an object. If AssertValid() fails to find an entry for the MFC object's m_hWnd member in any of the handle maps or finds an incorrect entry, it fires an assertion. In Visual C++ 2.1, these assertions are in file Wincore.cpp, lines 797 and 798. In Visual C++ 2.2, they are in Wincore.cpp, lines 804 and 805. In Visual C++ 4.0, they are in Wincore.cpp, lines 871 and 872.

Calls to the ASSERT_VALID macro are sprinkled all over the MFC source code. Hence, from a particular thread, if you end up calling a function that calls ASSERT_VALID on MFC window objects that belong to some other thread, you get an assertion. If you do not get an assertion, you may still get abnormal behavior because you are not allowed to directly manipulate windows created by other threads.

The correct approach in such situations is to work with window handles, not MFC objects. It is safe to pass window handles across thread boundaries. If thread A passes a window handle to thread B, then thread B can use this window handle to send or post messages to the window. When these messages are processed, you are back in the context of thread A and calls to CWnd::AssertValid() to check thread A's window handle maps will succeed.

In this scenario, thread B can also use the CWnd::FromHandle() function to get a temporary CWnd object which is placed in thread B's temporary handle map. However this object may be of only limited use, because in no way is it in synchronization with the MFC object existing in thread A's handle maps.
  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值