题目:
Given an array of integers A
and let n to be its length.
Assume Bk
to be an array obtained by rotating the array A
k positions clock-wise, we define a "rotation function" F
on A
as follow:
F(k) = 0 * Bk[0] + 1 * Bk[1] + ... + (n-1) * Bk[n-1]
.
Calculate the maximum value of F(0), F(1), ..., F(n-1)
.
Note:
n is guaranteed to be less than 105.
Example:
A = [4, 3, 2, 6] F(0) = (0 * 4) + (1 * 3) + (2 * 2) + (3 * 6) = 0 + 3 + 4 + 18 = 25 F(1) = (0 * 6) + (1 * 4) + (2 * 3) + (3 * 2) = 0 + 4 + 6 + 6 = 16 F(2) = (0 * 2) + (1 * 6) + (2 * 4) + (3 * 3) = 0 + 6 + 8 + 9 = 23 F(3) = (0 * 3) + (1 * 2) + (2 * 6) + (3 * 4) = 0 + 2 + 12 + 12 = 26 So the maximum value of F(0), F(1), F(2), F(3) is F(3) = 26.
思路:
1、暴力法:就是每个F函数的值都试一遍,最后得到最大值,思路比较直观。这样代码的复杂度就是O(n^2)了,果然无法通过大数据测试。
2、递推法:在网上看到一个非常巧妙的递归方程:F(i) = F(i - 1) + sum(A) - length(A) * A[length(A) - i]。这样就可以由F(i-1)在O(1)的时间内递推得到F(i),将时间复杂度降低到O(n)。可是这个递推方程是怎么得到的呢?自己还是没有理解。
代码:
1、暴力法:
class Solution {
public:
int maxRotateFunction(vector<int>& A) {
if (A.size() == 0) {
return 0;
}
int ans = INT_MIN;
for (int i = 0; i < A.size(); ++i) {
vector<int> B = rotate(A, i);
ans = max(ans, rotateFunction(B));
}
return ans;
}
private:
vector<int> rotate(vector<int>& A, int k) {
if (A.size() == 0) {
return {};
}
if (k == 0) {
return A;
}
k = k % A.size();
vector<int> B(A);
rotate(B, 0, B.size() - 1);
rotate(B, 0, k - 1);
rotate(B, k, B.size() - 1);
return B;
}
void rotate(vector<int> &B, int start, int end) {
while (start < end) {
swap(B[start++], B[end--]);
}
}
int rotateFunction(vector<int>& B) {
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < B.size(); ++i) {
ans += i * B[i];
}
return ans;
}
};
2、递推法:
class Solution {
public:
int maxRotateFunction(vector<int>& A) {
int length = A.size(), sum_A = 0, sum = 0, ans = INT_MIN;
for (int i = 0; i < length; ++i) {
sum_A += A[i];
sum += i * A[i];
}
ans = sum;
for (int i = 1; i < length; ++i) {
sum = sum + sum_A - length * A[length - i];
ans = max(ans, sum);
}
return ans;
}
};