1.向上转型时,任何域的访问操作都将是由编译器解析,因此不是多态的。
//: polymorphism/FieldAccess.java
package polymorphism; /* Added by Eclipse.py */
// Direct field access is determined at compile time.
class Super {
public int field = 0;
public int getField() { return field; }
}
class Sub extends Super {
public int field = 1;
public int getField() { return field; }
public int getSuperField() { return super.field; }
}
public class FieldAccess {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Super sup = new Sub(); // Upcast
System.out.println("sup.field = " + sup.field +
", sup.getField() = " + sup.getField());
Sub sub = new Sub();
System.out.println("sub.field = " +
sub.field + ", sub.getField() = " +
sub.getField() +
", sub.getSuperField() = " +
sub.getSuperField());
}
}
/* Output:
sup.field = 0, sup.getField() = 1
sub.field = 1, sub.getField() = 1, sub.getSuperField() = 0
*///:~
输出的sup.field是0,而不是1,是因为sup和field的绑定是在编译器就确定了,不像getField方法一样,可以后期绑定。这种特性,似乎很容易导致错误,可以通过把变量定义成private,或者干脆在继承的时候就不要定义和父类一样的变量名。