#import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h>
@interface Student : NSObject {
NSString *name;
NSString *studentNO;
}
- (NSString*)name;
- (NSString*)studentNO;
- (void)setName:(NSString*)aName;
- (void)setStudentNO:(NSString*)aStudentNO;
@end
// Student.h
- (NSString*)name
{
return name;
}
- (NSString*)studentNO
{
return studentNO;
}
- (void)setName:(NSString*)aName
{
[name autorelease];
name = [aName copy];
}
- (void)setStudentNO:(NSString*)aStudentNO
{
[studentNO autorelease];
studentNO = [aStudentNO copy];
}
main里面这么用:
Student *hayes = [[Student alloc] init];
[hayes setName:@"Hayes"];
[hayes setStudentNO:@"00000"];
NSLog(@"Name: %@", [hayes name]);
NSLog(@"Student NO: %@", [hayes studentNO]);
#import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h>
@interface Student : NSObject <NSCoding> {
NSString *name;
NSString *studentNO;
}
@property(copy) NSString *name;
@property(copy) NSString *studentNO;
@end
// Student.m
#import "Student.h"
@implementation Student
@synthesize name;
@synthesize studentNO;
@end
在main函数里可以这么调用:
Student *hayes = [[Student alloc] init];
hayes.name = @"hayes";
hayes.studentNO = @"00001";
NSLog(@"%@", hayes.name);
NSLog(@"%@", hayes. studentNO);
- -
(void)setName:(NSString *)newName { -
if (name != newName) { -
[name release]; -
name = [newName retain]; -
// name’s retain count has been bumped up by 1 -
} - }
比如一个NSString
Copy
retain
retain
下面分享一个网友的总结
一直以来个人觉得如果一个类是的property是readonly的那么再指定其他的如assign/retain/copy这样的属性就实在是没有什么意义了。确实你想想既然都readonly了,肯定是没有setter的,既然没有setter那么谈assign/retain/copy又有什么意义呢?所以一直以来我从来不对readonly的property加retain/copy属性申明,默认assign就足够了,simple is beautiful!
但是我现在发现我错了,其实一直都有一种这种感觉,只是没有找到100%的充分理由为readonly加上retain/copy。但是假如你要在你的subclass改写property,而加入你要改写的是一个NSString,你像把这个属性设置为readwrite和copy,往往杯具就发生了,编译时候可恶的warning 产生了,因为copy和之前默认的assign明显不相同啊!
终上,不论什么时候,都要为你的readonly的对象属性加上合适的retain/copy申明。你现在不用,但不说明你将来就不会用,出来混迟早都要还的!