jackson、fastjson、kryo、protobuf等序列化效率对比【全】

原创不易，转载请注明出处：

https://blog.csdn.net/q258523454/article/details/129953047

---

 一、实测数据

大家可以先看一组，我实测的数据，只对比我们常用的4种方式：jackson、fastjson、kryo、protostuff。

        测试条件：

        CPU:  i7 2.80GHz
        内存: 16GB
        系统: 64位

        备注:
        每次插入1个 StudentObject, 每个 StudentObject中含有 100000 个 Student 对象
        600次,共6000万个对象,实测数据.

方式	序列化	反序列化	存储大小
fastjson	70 ms	43 ms	4.3 M
jackson	68 ms	135 ms	7.6 M
kryo	19 ms	20 ms	1.7 M
protoStuff	14 ms	30 ms	2.1 M

首选: kryo，其次 protoStuff

二、序列化效率、反序列化效率、对象大小、综合性能

排名	序列化效率	反序列化效率	对象大小	综合性能
1	protostuff	java-manual	kryo-opt	kryo-manual
2	protostuff-manual	wobly	kryo-manual	protostuff-manual
3	protobuf/protostuff	kryo-manual	kryo-flat-pre	protostuff
4	kryo-manual	fst-flat-pre	avro-generic	protobuf/protostuff
5	protostuff-runtime	protostuff-manual	avro-specific	java-manual
6	kryo-flat-pre	wobly-compact	wobly-compact	wobly
7	fst-flat-pre	protobuf/protostuff	msgpack-databind	fst-flat-pre
8	protobuf/protostuff-runtime	protostuff	msgpack-manual	protostuff-runtime
9	kryo-flat	protobuf/protostuff-runtime	protobuf/protostuff	protobuf/protostuff-runtime
10	java-manual	protostuff-runtime	protobuf	wobly-compact
11	wobly	protostuff-graph	protostuff-graph	protostuff-graph
12	protostuff-graph	protobuf	protostuff-manual	kryo-flat-pre
13	msgpack-manual	protostuff-graph-runtime	protostuff	protostuff-graph-runtime
14	protostuff-graph-runtime	thrift-compact	thrift-compact	kryo-flat
15	smile/jackson/manual	kryo-flat-pre	protobuf/protostuff-runtime	fst-flat
16	wobly-compact	kryo-flat	protostuff-graph-runtime	protobuf
17	fst-flat	fst-flat	protostuff-runtime	kryo-opt
18	kryo-opt	kryo-opt	fst-flat-pre	json/fastjson/databind
19	json/jackson/manual	scala/sbinary	wobly	smile/jackson/manual
20	json/fastjson/databind	json/fastjson/databind	java-manual	scala/sbinary
21	msgpack-databind	thrift	scala/sbinary	thrift-compact
22	protobuf	jboss-marshalling-river-ct-manual	kryo-flat	json/jackson/manual
23	json/protostuff-manual	kryo-serializer	kryo-serializer	jboss-marshalling-river-ct-manual
24	cbor/jackson/databind	fst	jboss-marshalling-river-ct-manual	fst
25	cbor/jackson/manual	smile/jackson/manual	jboss-marshalling-river-ct	kryo-serializer
26	smile/jackson/databind	json/jackson/manual	fst-flat	msgpack-manual
27	fst	msgpack-manual	fst	thrift
28	avro-specific	cbor/jackson/manual	xml/exi-manual	cbor/jackson/manual
29	json/jackson/databind	smile/jackson+afterburner/afterburner	smile/jackson/databind	msgpack-databind
30	scala/sbinary	msgpack-databind	smile/jackson/manual	cbor/jackson/databind

三、总结 

Kryo——速度快，序列化后体积小；缺点是跨语言支持较复杂
Protostuff——速度快，基于protobuf；缺点是需静态编译
Protostuff-Runtime,无需静态编译，但序列化前需预先传入schema;缺点是不支持无默认构造函数的类，反序列化时需用户自己初始化序列化后的对象，其只负责将该对象进行赋值
Java——使用方便，可序列化所有类；缺点是速度慢，占空间

具体的对比可以参考这个基线图：

Results - JVM Serializer Benchmarks

 效率对比直观图：

An Introduction and Comparison of Several Common Java Serialization Frameworks - Alibaba Cloud Community

首选序列化：Kryo、Protostuff