先说结论吧
- 代码1和代码2,两种spring管理的AuthRequestWrap 里的AuthRequest,是同一个对象
- 如果类有@Configuration注解,@Configuration 中所有带 @Bean 注解的方法都会被动态代理。因此调用该方法(getAuth() )和使用形参注入的方式 返回的都是同一个实例,返回被spring管理的bean。
- 如果修饰类的是普通的@Component之类的组件类,直接调用方法和形参注入不是一个对象
@Configuration
Class xxxx{
@Bean
public AuthRequest getAuth(){
return new AuthRequest();
}
@Bean
public AuthRequestWrap AuthRequestWrap(AuthRequest request){
AuthRequestWrap authRequestWrap = new AuthRequestWrap();
authRequestWrap.setRequest(request);
return authRequestWrap;
}
}
@Configuration
Class Xxxx{
@Bean
public AuthRequest getAuth(){
return new AuthRequest();
}
@Bean
public AuthRequestWrap AuthRequestWrap(){
AuthRequestWrap authRequestWrap = new AuthRequestWrap();
authRequestWrap.setRequest(getAuth()); //类没有被Configuration修饰时, idea 会爆红,Method annotated with @Bean is called directly. Use dependency injection instead.
return authRequestWrap;
}
}
```