MySQL中distinct和group by性能比较[转]
之前看了网上的一些测试,感觉不是很准确,今天亲自测试了一番。得出了结论(仅在个人计算机上测试,可能不全面,仅供参考)
测试过程:
准备一张测试表
CREATE TABLE `test_test` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`num` int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=1 ;
建个储存过程向表中插入10W条数据
01 create procedure p_test(pa int(11))
02 begin
03
04 declare max_num int(11) default 100000;
05 declare i int default 0;
06 declare rand_num int;
07
08 select count(id) into max_num from test_test;
09
10 while i < pa do
11 if max_num < 100000 then
12 select cast(rand()*100 as unsigned) into rand_num;
13 insert into test_test(num)values(rand_num);
14 end if;
15 set i = i +1;
16 end while;
17 end
调用存储过程插入数据
all p_test(100000);
开始测试:(不加索引)
01 select distinct num from test_test;
02 select num from test_test group by num;
03
04 [SQL] select distinct num from test_test;
05 受影响的行: 0
06 时间: 0.078ms
07
08 [SQL]
09 select num from test_test group by num;
10 受影响的行: 0
11 时间: 0.031ms
二、num字段上创建索引
ALTER TABLE `test_test` ADD INDEX `num_index` (`num`) ;
再次查询
01 select distinct num from test_test;
02 select num from test_test group by num;
03 [SQL] select distinct num from test_test;
04 受影响的行: 0
05 时间: 0.000ms
06
07 [SQL]
08 select num from test_test group by num;
09 受影响的行: 0
10 时间: 0.000ms
这时候我们发现时间太小了 0.000秒都无法精确了。
我们转到命令行下 测试
01 mysql> set profiling=1;
02 mysql> select distinct(num) from test_test;
03 mysql> select num from test_test group by num;
04 mysql> show profiles;
05 +----------+------------+----------------------------------------+
06 | Query_ID | Duration | Query |
07 +----------+------------+----------------------------------------+
08 | 1 | 0.00072550 | select distinct(num) from test_test |
09 | 2 | 0.00071650 | select num from test_test group by num |
10 +----------+------------+----------------------------------------+
加了索引之后 distinct 比没加索引的 distinct 快了 107倍。
加了索引之后 group by 比没加索引的 group by 快了 43倍。
再来对比 :distinct 和 group by
不管是加不加索引 group by 都比 distinct 快。因此使用的时候建议选 group by
转载自: https://www.cnblogs.com/zox2011/archive/2012/09/12/2681797.html