Linux Kernel Coding Style Ⅰ

Linux Kernel Coding Style
This is a short document describing the preferred coding style for the linux kernel. Coding style is very personal, and I won’t_force_ my views on anybody, but this is what goes for anything that I have to be able to maintain, and I’d prefer it for most other things too. Please at least consider the point made here.
First off,I’d suggest printing out a copy of the GNU coding standards, and NOT read it. Burn them, it’s a great symbolic gesture.
Anyway, here goes:

Chapter 1 :Indentation
Tabs are 8 characters, and thus indentations are also 8 characters. There are heretic movements that try to make indentations 4 (or even 2!) characters deep, and that is akin to trying to define the value of PI to be 3.

Rationale: The whole idea behind indentation is to clearly define where a block of control starts and ends. Especially when you’ve been looking at your screen for 20 straight hours, you’ll find it a lot easier to see how the indentaion works if you have large indentations.

Now, some people will claim that having 8-character indentations makes the code move too far to the right, and makes it hard to read on a 80-character terminal screen. The answer to that is that if you need more than 3 levels of indentation, you’re screwed anyway, and should fix your program.

In short, 8-char indents make things easier to read, and have the added benefit of warning you when you’re nesting your functions too deep. Heed that warning.

The preferred way to ease multiple indentation levels in a switch statement is to align the “switch”; and its subordinate “case”; labels in the same column instead of “double-indenting” the “case” labels.E.g:
switch (suffix) {
case ‘G’ :
case ‘g’ :
mem <<= 30;
break;
case ‘M’ :
case ‘m’ :
mem <<=20;
break;
case ‘K’ :
case ‘k’ :
mem <<=10;
/* fall through */
default:
break;

}

Don’t put multiple statements on a single line unless you have something to hide:
if (conditon) do_this;
do_something_everytime;

Don’t put multiple assignments on a single line either. Kernel coding style is super simple. Avoid tricky expressions.

Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.

Get a decent editor and don’t leave whitespace at the end of lines.

Chapter 2 : Breaking long lines and strings
Coding style is all about readablility and maintainability using commonly available tools.

The limit on the length of lines is 80 columns and this is a hard limit.

Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible chunks. Descendants are always substantially shorter than the parent and are placed substantially to the right. The same applies to function headers with a long argument list. Long strings are as well broken into shorter strings.

void fun (int a, int b, int c)
{
if (condition)
printk(KERN_WARNING “Warning this is a long printk with”
“3 parameters a: %u b:%u”
“c: %u\n”, a, b, c);
else
next_statement;
}

Chapter 3 : Placing Braces

The other issue that always comes up in C styling is the placement of braces. Unlike the indent size, there are few technical reasons to choose one placement strategy over the other, but the preferred way, as shown to us by the prophets Kernighan and Ritchie, is to put the opening brace last on the line, and put the closing brace first, thusly:

if (x is true) {
we do y
}

This applies to all non-function statement blocks (if, switch, for, while, do).E.g:
switch (action) {
case KOBJ_ADD:
return “add”;
case KOBJ_REMOVE:
return “remove”;
case KOBJ_CHANGE:
return “change”;
default:
return NULL;
}

Howere, there is one special case, namely functions: they have the opening brace at the beginning of the next line, thus:

int function(int x)
{
body of function
}

Heretic people all over the world have claimed that this inconsistency is … well … inconsistent,but all right-thinking people know that (a) K&R are right and (b) K&R are right. Besides,functions are special anyway (you can’t nest them in C)

Now that the closing brace is empty on a line of its own, except in the cases where it is followed by a continuation of the same statement, ie a “while” in a do-statement or an “else” in an if-statement, like this:
do {
body of do-loop
}while(condition);

and
if (x == y) {

} else if (x > y) {

} else {

}

Also, note that this brace-placement also minimizes the number of empty (or almost empty) lines, without any loss of readability. Thus, as the supply of new-lines on your screen is not a renewable resource (think 25-line terminal screens here), you have more empty lines to put comments on.

Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
if (condition)
action();

This does not apply if one branch of a conditional statement is a single statement. User braces in both branches.
if (condition) {
do_this();
do_that();
} else {
otherwise();
}

3.1 Spaces
Linux kernel style for use of spaces depends (mostly) on function-versus-keyword usage. Use a space after (most) keywords. The notable exceptions are sizeof, typeof, alignof, and attribute, which look somewhat like functions (and are usually used with parentheses in Linux, although they are not required in the language, as in :“sizeof info” after “struct fileinfo info;” is declared).
So use a space after these keywords:
if, switch, case, for, do, while
but not with sizeof, typeof, alignof, or attribute. E.g.:
s = sizeof(struct file);

Do not add spaces around (inside) parenthesized expressions. This example is bad:
s = sizeof( struct file );

When declaring pointer data or a function that returns a pointer type, the preferred use of ‘*’ is adjacent to the data name or function name and not adjacent to the type name. Examples:

*char linux_banner;
**unsigned long long memparse(char *ptr, char retptr);
**char match_strdup(substring_t s);
Use one space around (on each side of) most binary and ternary operators, such as any of these:
= + - < > * / % | & ^ <= >= == != ? **
but no space after unary operators:
** & * + - ~ ! sizeof typeof alignof __attribute __ defined **
no space before the postfix increment & decrement unary operators:
** ++ —

and no space around the ‘.’ and “->” structure member operators.

Do not leave trailing whitespace at the ends of lines. Some editors with “smart” indentation will insert whitespace at the beginning of new lines as appropriate, so you can start typing the next line of code right away. Howeve, some such editors do not remove the whitespace if you end up not putting a line of code there, such as if you leave a blank line. As aresult, you end up with lines containing trailing whitespace.

Git will warn you about patches that introduce trailing whitespace, and optionally strip the trailing whitespces for you; however, if applying a series of patches, this may make later patches in the series fail by changing their context lines.

Chapter 4: Naming
C is a Spartan language, and so should your naming be. Unlike Modula-2 and Pascal programmers, C programmers do not use cute names like ThisVariableIsATemporaryCounter. A C programmer would call that variable “tmp”, whitch is much easier to write, and not the least more difficult to understand.

HOWEVER, while mixed-case names are frowned upon, descriptive names for global variables are a must. To call a gloable function “foo” is a shooting offense.

GLOBAL variables (to be used only if you_really_need them) need to have descriptive names, as do global functions. If you have a function that counts the number of active users, you should call that “count_active_users()” or similar, you should_not_call it “cntusr()”.

Encoding the type of a function into the name (so-called Hungarian notation) is brain damaged-the compiler knows the types anyway and can check those, and it only confuses the programmer. No wonder MicroSoft makes buggy prgrams.

LOCAL variable names should be short, and to the point. If you have some random integer loop counter, it should probably be called “i”. Calling it “loop_counter” is non-productive, if there is no chance of it being mis-understood. Similarly, “tmp” can be just about any type of variable that is used to hold a temporary value.

If you are afraid to mix up your local variable names, you have another problem, which is called the function-growth-hormone-imbalance syndrome. See next chapter.

Chaoter 5: Typedefs
Please don’t use things like “vps_t”
It’s a_mistake_ to use typedef for structures and pointers. When you see a
vps_t a;
in the source, what does it mean?
Icontrast, if it ways
*struct virtual_container a;
you can actuall tell what “a” is.
Lots of people think that typedefs “help readability”. Not so. They are useful only for:
a. totally opaque objects (where the typedef is actively used to_hide_ what the object is).
Example:“pte_t” etc. opaque objects that you can only access using the proper accessor function.
NOTE! Opaqueness and “accessor functions” are not good in themselves. The reason we have them for things like pte_t etc.
is that there really is absolutely _zero_protably accessible information there.
b. Clear integer types, where the abstraction _helps_avoid confusion whether it is “int” or “long”.
u8/u16/u32 are perfectly fine typedefs, although they fit into category (d) better than here.
NOTE! Again - there needs to be a reason for this. If something is “unsigned long”, then there’s no reason to do
typedef unsigned long myflags_t;
but if there is a clear reason for why it under certain circumstances might be an “unsigned int” and under other configurations might be “unsigned long”, then by all means go ahead and use a typedef.
c. when you use sparse to literally create a _new_type for type-checking.
d. New types which are identical to standard C99 types, in certain exceptional circumstances.
Although it would only take a short amount of time for the eyes and brain to become accustomed to the standard types like ‘uint32_t’, some people object to their use anyway.
Therefore, the Linux-specific ‘u8/u16/u32/u64’ types and their signed equivalents which are identical to standard types are permitted --although they are not mandatory in new code of you own.
When editing existing code which already uses one or the other set of types, you should conform to the existing choices in that code.
e. types safe for use in userspace.
In certain structures which are visible to userspace, we cannot require C99 types and cannot use the ‘u32’ form above. Thus, we use __u32 and similar types in all structures which are shared with userspace.
Maybe there are other cases too, but the rule should basically be to NEVER EVER use a typedef unless you can clearly match one of those rules.

In general, a pointer, or a struct that has elements that can reasonably be directly accessed should never be a typedef.

Chapter 6: Functions
Functions should be short and sweet, and do just one thing. They should fit on one or two screenfuls of text (the ISO/ANSI screen size is 80x24, as we all know), and do one thing and do that well.
The maximum length of a function is inversely proportional to the complexity and indentation level of that function. So, if you have a conceptually simple function that is just one long (but simple) case-statement, where you have to do lots of small things for a lot of different cases, it’s OK to have a longer function.

However, if you have a complex function, and you suspect that a less-than-gifted first-year high-school student might not even understand what the function is all about, you should adhere to the maximum limits all the more closely. Use helper functions with descriptive names (you can ask the compiler to in-line them if you think it’s performance-critical, and it will probably do a better job of it than you would have done).

Another measure of the function is the number of local variables. They shouldn’t exceed 5-10, or you’re doing something wrong. Re-think the function, and split it into smaller pieces. A human brain can generally easily keep track of about 7 different things, anything more and it gets confused. You know you’re brilliant, but maybe you’d like to understand what you did 2 weeks from now.

In source files, separate functions with one one blank line. If the function is exported, the EXPORT* macro for it should follow immediately after the closing function brace line.
E.g.:
int system_is_up(void) {
return system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(system_is_up);

In function prototypes, include parameter names with their data types. Although this is not required by the C language, it is preferred in Linux because it is a simple way to add valuable information for the reader.

  • 0
    点赞
  • 1
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值