写在开头
本文简单介绍了LiveData的源码,并实现了一个非粘性事件添加的类
LiveData
/**
* Creates a LiveData initialized with the given {@code value}.
*
* @param value initial value
*/
public LiveData(T value) {
mData = value;
mVersion = START_VERSION + 1;
}
/**
* Creates a LiveData with no value assigned to it.
*/
public LiveData() {
mData = NOT_SET;
mVersion = START_VERSION;
}
LiveData构造时初始化了一个变量mVersion,数据分发时会根据Version来判断是否要分发
/**
* Adds the given observer to the observers list within the lifespan of the given
* owner. The events are dispatched on the main thread. If LiveData already has data
* set, it will be delivered to the observer.
* <p>
* The observer will only receive events if the owner is in {@link Lifecycle.State#STARTED}
* or {@link Lifecycle.State#RESUMED} state (active).
* <p>
* If the owner moves to the {@link Lifecycle.State#DESTROYED} state, the observer will
* automatically be removed.
* <p>
* When data changes while the {@code owner} is not active, it will not receive any updates.
* If it becomes active again, it will receive the last available data automatically.
* <p>
* LiveData keeps a strong reference to the observer and the owner as long as the
* given LifecycleOwner is not destroyed. When it is destroyed, LiveData removes references to
* the observer & the owner.
* <p>
* If the given owner is already in {@link Lifecycle.State#DESTROYED} state, LiveData
* ignores the call.
* <p>
* If the given owner, observer tuple is already in the list, the call is ignored.
* If the observer is already in the list with another owner, LiveData throws an
* {@link IllegalArgumentException}.
*
* @param owner The LifecycleOwner which controls the observer
* @param observer The observer that will receive the events
*/
@MainThread
public void observe(@NonNull LifecycleOwner owner, @NonNull Observer<? super T> observer) {
assertMainThread("observe");
if (owner.getLifecycle().getCurrentState() == DESTROYED) {
// ignore
return;
}
LifecycleBoundObserver wrapper = new LifecycleBoundObserver(owner, observer);
ObserverWrapper existing = mObservers.putIfAbsent(observer, wrapper);
if (existing != null && !existing.isAttachedTo(owner)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cannot add the same observer"
+ " with different lifecycles");
}
if (existing != null) {
return;
}
owner.getLifecycle().addObserver(wrapper);
}
包装LifeCycleBoundObserver然后调用LifeCycle进行添加
@Override
public void addObserver(@NonNull LifecycleObserver observer) {
State initialState = mState == DESTROYED ? DESTROYED : INITIALIZED;
ObserverWithState statefulObserver = new ObserverWithState(observer, initialState);
ObserverWithState previous = mObserverMap.putIfAbsent(observer, statefulObserver);
if (previous != null) {
return;
}
LifecycleOwner lifecycleOwner = mLifecycleOwner.get();
if (lifecycleOwner == null) {
// it is null we should be destroyed. Fallback quickly
return;
}
boolean isReentrance = mAddingObserverCounter != 0 || mHandlingEvent;
State targetState = calculateTargetState(observer);
mAddingObserverCounter++;
while ((statefulObserver.mState.compareTo(targetState) < 0
&& mObserverMap.contains(observer))) {
pushParentState(statefulObserver.mState);
statefulObserver.dispatchEvent(lifecycleOwner, upEvent(statefulObserver.mState));
popParentState();
// mState / subling may have been changed recalculate
targetState = calculateTargetState(observer);
}
if (!isReentrance) {
// we do sync only on the top level.
sync();
}
mAddingObserverCounter--;
}
通过while分发事件,这里得出一个结论,LiveData是默认粘性事件处理的,我们有时候不需要粘性事件,怎么办?下面的LiveDataBus提供了解决方案。
为什么一定是粘性事件?
因为一开始创建的observer会被包装成LifecycleBoundObserver,这里面的默认的Version是-1只有调用过onChange之后才会被赋值为最新Version,这个包装方法Google并没有提供给开发者,所以只能自己创建mVersion来管理
回到LiveData的LifecycleBoundObserver,上面statefulObserver.dispatchEvent(lifecycleOwner, upEvent(statefulObserver.mState));最终会调用observer的onStateChanged方法。
class LifecycleBoundObserver extends ObserverWrapper implements LifecycleEventObserver {
@NonNull
final LifecycleOwner mOwner;
LifecycleBoundObserver(@NonNull LifecycleOwner owner, Observer<? super T> observer) {
super(observer);
mOwner = owner;
}
@Override
boolean shouldBeActive() {
return mOwner.getLifecycle().getCurrentState().isAtLeast(STARTED);
}
@Override
public void onStateChanged(@NonNull LifecycleOwner source,
@NonNull Lifecycle.Event event) {
if (mOwner.getLifecycle().getCurrentState() == DESTROYED) {
removeObserver(mObserver);
return;
}
activeStateChanged(shouldBeActive());
}
@Override
boolean isAttachedTo(LifecycleOwner owner) {
return mOwner == owner;
}
@Override
void detachObserver() {
mOwner.getLifecycle().removeObserver(this);
}
}
实现了LifecycleEventObserver,当宿主生命周期改版时就会调用onStateChaged,然后宿主DESTORY之后就移除宿主的Observer
void activeStateChanged(boolean newActive) {
if (newActive == mActive) {
return;
}
// immediately set active state, so we'd never dispatch anything to inactive
// owner
mActive = newActive;
boolean wasInactive = LiveData.this.mActiveCount == 0;
LiveData.this.mActiveCount += mActive ? 1 : -1;
if (wasInactive && mActive) {
onActive();
}
if (LiveData.this.mActiveCount == 0 && !mActive) {
onInactive();
}
if (mActive) {
dispatchingValue(this);
}
}
否则就进入这个方法,第二个判断是第一次添加observer时的调用,第三个判断是最后一个observer被移除时调用。否则调用dispatchingValue,然后在dispatchingValue中调用considerNotify
private void considerNotify(ObserverWrapper observer) {
if (!observer.mActive) {
return;
}
// Check latest state b4 dispatch. Maybe it changed state but we didn't get the event yet.
//
// we still first check observer.active to keep it as the entrance for events. So even if
// the observer moved to an active state, if we've not received that event, we better not
// notify for a more predictable notification order.
if (!observer.shouldBeActive()) {
observer.activeStateChanged(false);
return;
}
if (observer.mLastVersion >= mVersion) {
return;
}
observer.mLastVersion = mVersion;
observer.mObserver.onChanged((T) mData);
}
第二个判断判断宿主生命周期是否是start之后,然后判断Version是不是已经跟新过了,否则就调用更新分发
-
observerForever方法是不会自动帮忙移除Observer的需要手动调用
-
postValue方法是在子线程中调用设置value时必须使用
protected void postValue(T value) { boolean postTask; synchronized (mDataLock) { postTask = mPendingData == NOT_SET; mPendingData = value; } if (!postTask) { return; } ArchTaskExecutor.getInstance().postToMainThread(mPostValueRunnable); }
-
serValue是主线程中调用使用,
@MainThread
protected void setValue(T value) {
assertMainThread("setValue");
mVersion++;
mData = value;
dispatchingValue(null);
}
LiveData实现LiveDataBus
class LiveDataBus {
private object Lazy {
var sLiveDataBus = LiveDataBus()
}
private val mStickyHashMap = ConcurrentHashMap<String, StickyLiveData<*>>()
fun <T> with(eventName: String): StickyLiveData<T> {
var liveData = mStickyHashMap[eventName]
if (liveData == null) {
liveData = StickyLiveData<T>(eventName)
mStickyHashMap[eventName] = liveData
}
return liveData as StickyLiveData<T>
}
inner class StickyLiveData<T>(private val mEventName: String) : LiveData<T>() {
private var mStickyData: T? = null
private var mVersion = 0
public override fun postValue(value: T?) {
mVersion++
super.postValue(value)
}
public override fun setValue(value: T?) {
mVersion++
super.setValue(value)
}
fun setStickyData(data: T?) {
mStickyData = data
value = mStickyData!!
}
fun postStickyData(mStickyData: T?) {
this.mStickyData = mStickyData
postValue(mStickyData)
}
override fun observe(owner: LifecycleOwner, observer: Observer<in T?>) {
observeSticky(owner, observer, false)
}
private fun observeSticky(owner: LifecycleOwner, observer: Observer<in T?>, isSticky: Boolean) {
super.observe(owner, WrapperObserver(this, observer, isSticky))
owner.lifecycle.addObserver(LifecycleEventObserver { source, event ->
if (event == Lifecycle.Event.ON_DESTROY) {
mStickyHashMap.remove(mEventName)
}
})
}
private inner class WrapperObserver<T>(val mLiveData: StickyLiveData<T>, val mObserver: Observer<in T?>, val mIsSticky: Boolean) : Observer<T> {
private var mLastVersion = mLiveData.mVersion
override fun onChanged(t: T?) {
if (mLastVersion >= mLiveData.mVersion) {
if (mIsSticky && mLiveData.mStickyData != null) {
mObserver.onChanged(mLiveData.mStickyData)
}
return
}
mLastVersion = mLiveData.mVersion
mObserver.onChanged(t)
}
}
}
companion object {
fun get(): LiveDataBus {
return Lazy.sLiveDataBus
}
}
}