记一次Http响应gzip压缩踩的坑

目录

前言

正文

扩展

总结


前言

SpringBoot开启gzip压缩的配置如下

// 是否开启压缩,默认false
server.compression.enabled:
// 允许压缩的响应缓冲区最小字节数,默认2048
server.compression.min-response-size:
// 允许压缩的mimeType数组(逗号分隔,响应头Content-Type以其中一个数组项开头就能匹配)
server.compression.mime-types: 
// 不允许压缩的请求头User-Agent数组(逗号分隔,完全匹配)
server.compression.excluded-user-agents:

该配置具体默认值如下

org.springframework.boot.web.server.Compression

	private boolean enabled = false;

	private String[] mimeTypes = new String[] { "text/html", "text/xml", "text/plain", "text/css", "text/javascript",
			"application/javascript", "application/json", "application/xml" };

	private String[] excludedUserAgents = null;

	private DataSize minResponseSize = DataSize.ofKilobytes(2);

正文

这边用个Demo测试下

@RestController
@RequestMapping(value = "/api/gzip")
public class GzipTestController {

  @RequestMapping(value = "/gzipTest", method = RequestMethod.GET)
  public List<PersonVO> testGzip() {
    List<PersonVO> vos = Lists.newArrayList();
    for (int i = 1; i <= 20000; i++) {
      PersonVO vo = new PersonVO();
      vo.setId(i);
      vo.setName("test" + i);
      vo.setAge(i);
      vo.setSex("男");
      vos.add(vo);
    }
    return vos;
  }

}

在不开启gzip的情况下:

 在开启gzip的情况下:

可以看出,两者返回的响应体大小和相应时间还是有差距的。 

但是,在开启gzip压缩后,无论如何调整min-response-size,返回的响应体都是压缩过的。

在进行源码追踪后,定位到最终的问题的源码如下

org.apache.coyote.CompressionConfig#useCompression

        // If force mode, the length and MIME type checks are skipped
        if (compressionLevel != 2) {
            // Check if the response is of sufficient length to trigger the compression
            long contentLength = response.getContentLengthLong();
            if (contentLength != -1 && contentLength < compressionMinSize) {
                return false;
            }

            // Check for compatible MIME-TYPE
            String[] compressibleMimeTypes = getCompressibleMimeTypes();
            if (compressibleMimeTypes != null &&
                    !startsWithStringArray(compressibleMimeTypes, response.getContentType())) {
                return false;
            }
        }

从上图中可以看出,只有在contentLength不为-1且contentLength小于配置的min-response-size的值时才不会开启压缩。由于contengLength永远为-1,所以无论怎么修改min-response-size的值,响应体都是经过压缩的。

那究竟为什么contentLength为-1呢?这里从DispatcherServlet的doDispatch方法进行追踪,最终将问题定位在org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.AbstractMessageConverterMethodProcessor#writeWithMessageConverters(T, org.springframework.core.MethodParameter, org.springframework.http.server.ServletServerHttpRequest, org.springframework.http.server.ServletServerHttpResponse)这个方法中。

这个方法的具体逻辑就是将响应结果写出,写出的时候需要先选择符合的MediaType后再通过HttpMessageConverter消息转换器(这里符合测试接口的MidiaType为application/json;q=0.8,消息转换器为MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter)写出时,执行了write方法org.springframework.http.converter.AbstractGenericHttpMessageConverter#write

  public final void write(T t, @Nullable Type type, @Nullable MediaType contentType, HttpOutputMessage outputMessage) throws IOException, HttpMessageNotWritableException {
    HttpHeaders headers = outputMessage.getHeaders();
    this.addDefaultHeaders(headers, t, contentType);
    if (outputMessage instanceof StreamingHttpOutputMessage) {
      StreamingHttpOutputMessage streamingOutputMessage = (StreamingHttpOutputMessage)outputMessage;
      streamingOutputMessage.setBody((outputStream) -> {
        this.writeInternal(t, type, new HttpOutputMessage() {
          public OutputStream getBody() {
            return outputStream;
          }

          public HttpHeaders getHeaders() {
            return headers;
          }
        });
      });
    } else {
      this.writeInternal(t, type, outputMessage);
      outputMessage.getBody().flush();
    }

  }

这里有个this.addDefaultHeaders方法里面有设置contentLength的值

org.springframework.http.converter.AbstractHttpMessageConverter#addDefaultHeaders

    ...
    if (headers.getContentLength() < 0L && !headers.containsKey("Transfer-Encoding")) {
      Long contentLength = this.getContentLength(t, headers.getContentType());
      if (contentLength != null) {
        headers.setContentLength(contentLength);
      }
    }

org.springframework.http.converter.json.AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter#getContentLength

  protected Long getContentLength(Object object, @Nullable MediaType contentType) throws IOException {
    if (object instanceof MappingJacksonValue) {
      object = ((MappingJacksonValue)object).getValue();
    }

    return super.getContentLength(object, contentType);
  }

由于我返回的object不是MappingJacksonValue的类实例,因此走的super.getContentLength方法

org.springframework.http.converter.AbstractHttpMessageConverter#getContentLength

  protected Long getContentLength(T t, @Nullable MediaType contentType) throws IOException {
    return null;
  }

这里直接返回null,那么将不会设置Content-Length。

再回到org.apache.coyote.CompressionConfig#useCompression方法中,再调用response.getContentLengthLong方法时,里面直接取的Response对象的contentLength值,默认为-1

    /**
     * HTTP specific fields.
     */
    String contentType = null;
    String contentLanguage = null;
    Charset charset = null;
    // Retain the original name used to set the charset so exactly that name is
    // used in the ContentType header. Some (arguably non-specification
    // compliant) user agents are very particular
    String characterEncoding = null;
    long contentLength = -1;
    private Locale locale = DEFAULT_LOCALE;

因此,在判断是否需要进行gzip压缩时,min-response-size永远不生效。

扩展

首先看下源码中是如何判断是否需要开启压缩

org.apache.coyote.CompressionConfig#useCompression

        ...
        Enumeration<String> headerValues = request.getMimeHeaders().values("accept-encoding");
        boolean foundGzip = false;
        while (!foundGzip && headerValues.hasMoreElements()) {
            List<AcceptEncoding> acceptEncodings = null;
            try {
                acceptEncodings = AcceptEncoding.parse(new StringReader(headerValues.nextElement()));
            } catch (IOException ioe) {
                // If there is a problem reading the header, disable compression
                return false;
            }

            for (AcceptEncoding acceptEncoding : acceptEncodings) {
                if ("gzip".equalsIgnoreCase(acceptEncoding.getEncoding())) {
                    foundGzip = true;
                    break;
                }
            }
        }

从上图中可以看出,判断是否需要开启压缩是根据Request Headers请求头中的Accept-Encoding中是否含有gzip的值。

那么既然contentLength的值没法控制,可以换个思路只针对部分接口开启压缩。那么如何针对部分接口开启gzip压缩呢?我的想法是在配置中心加上需要开启gzip压缩的路径,利用过滤器将不匹配的请求移除Accept-Encoding,下面是具体的Demo。

public class CompressionFilter extends OncePerRequestFilter {

  private final String[] gzipUrls = "/api/gzip/*".split(",");
  private final AntPathMatcher antPathMatcher = new AntPathMatcher();

  @Override
  protected void doFilterInternal(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response,
      FilterChain filterChain) throws ServletException, IOException {
    String requestUri = request.getRequestURI();
    boolean match = Arrays.stream(gzipUrls).anyMatch(url -> antPathMatcher.match(url,
        requestUri));
    if (!match) {
      try {
        Field requestField = ReflectionUtils
            .findField(RequestFacade.class, "request", Request.class);
        requestField.setAccessible(true);
        Request request1 = (Request) requestField.get(request);
        Field coyoteRequestField = ReflectionUtils
            .findField(Request.class, "coyoteRequest", org.apache.coyote.Request.class);
        coyoteRequestField.setAccessible(true);
        org.apache.coyote.Request coyoteRequest =
            (org.apache.coyote.Request) coyoteRequestField.get(request1);
        Field headersField = ReflectionUtils
            .findField(org.apache.coyote.Request.class, "headers", MimeHeaders.class);
        headersField.setAccessible(true);
        MimeHeaders mimeHeaders = (MimeHeaders) headersField.get(coyoteRequest);
        mimeHeaders.removeHeader("Accept-Encoding");
      } catch (Exception e) {
        throw new RuntimeException(e);
      }
    }
    filterChain.doFilter(request, response);
  }
@Configuration
public class FilterConfig {

  @Bean
  public FilterRegistrationBean compressionFilter() {
    FilterRegistrationBean filterRegistrationBean = new FilterRegistrationBean();
    filterRegistrationBean.setFilter(new CompressionFilter());
    filterRegistrationBean.setOrder(Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE);
    filterRegistrationBean.addUrlPatterns("/*");
    filterRegistrationBean.setName("compressionFilter");
    return filterRegistrationBean;
  }

这里我写了个过滤器,通过路径AntPathMatcher进行路径匹配,不符合的请求通过反射将Accept-Encoding移除。

这里看下执行结果

能成功匹配的:

 无法匹配的:

由于是Demo方便测试,这里配置的路径我直接写死的。在实际的应用中,都是以分布式的一个配置中心进行配置,以热更新的形式获取到最新配置的值。

总结

gzip压缩好处是可以节约带宽、流量,代价是额外的CPU、内存等系统资源的额外开销。如今性能过剩,带宽明显比cpu等要更重要。在实际应用中,开启gzip压缩通常都是配置在nginx或者网关中。

  • 3
    点赞
  • 2
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值