synchronizedList的线程不安全问题

我们知道ArrayList是线程不安全的，那么synchronizedList呢，有没有不安全的现象
试一试

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;

/**
 * @Auther: 罗罗
 * @Description:
 */
public class Test02 {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        A a = new A();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            new Thread(a).start();
        }
    }
}
class A implements Runnable{
    private static List list = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<String>());
    static {
        list.add("aa");
        list.add("bb");
        list.add("cc");
    }
    @Override
    public void run() {
         Iterator iterator = list.iterator();
        while (iterator.hasNext()){
            System.out.println(iterator.next());
            list.add("655456");
        }
    }
}

“C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\bin\java.exe" "-javaagent:D:\IntelliJ IDEA\IntelliJ IDEA 2018.2.4\lib\idea_rt.jar=62601:D:\IntelliJ IDEA\IntelliJ IDEA 2018.2.4\bin" -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -classpath "C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre\lib\jce.jar;C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre\lib\jfr.jar;C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre\lib\jfxswt.jar;C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre\lib\jsse.jar;C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre\lib\management-agent.jar;C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre\lib\plugin.jar;C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre\lib\resources.jar;C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre\lib\rt.jar;D:\IDEA2018\volatile\out\production\volatile" Test02
aa
Exception in thread "Thread-0" Exception in thread "Thread-2" Exception in thread "Thread-3" Exception in thread "Thread-1" Exception in thread "Thread-4" Exception in thread "Thread-6" Exception in thread "Thread-5" Exception in thread "Thread-7" Exception in thread "Thread-8" Exception in thread "Thread-9" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
aa
aa
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:901)
aa
aa
aa
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:851)
aa
aa
	at A.run(Test02.java:34)
aa
aa
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:901)
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:851)
	at A.run(Test02.java:34)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:901)
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:851)
	at A.run(Test02.java:34)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:901)
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:851)
	at A.run(Test02.java:34)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:901)
	at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:851)
	at A.run(Test02.java:34)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

Process finished with exit code 0

发现报错，不是加了synchronized 关键字吗，看了一下源码，发现迭代器并没有加锁，并且推荐我们自己加锁

 public ListIterator<E> listIterator() {
            return list.listIterator(); // Must be manually synched by user
        }

        public ListIterator<E> listIterator(int index) {
            return list.listIterator(index); // Must be manually synched by user
        }

既然迭代器不行，那么使用增强for呢

for (String str : list) {
    System.out.print(str);
}

我们对增强for使用反编译

	Integer i;
    for(Iterator iterator = list.iterator(); iterator.hasNext(); System.out.println(i)){
        i = (Integer)iterator.next();        
    }

发现也是使用了迭代器，增强for操作不是原子性的，如果在遍历的过程中，进行add,remove操作，就会抛出异常。
总结：使用SynchronizedList的时候，进行遍历时要手动进行同步处理 。