modifier --require逻辑用方法封装后调用会更省gas吗？修饰的方法越多会剩gas吗

请看测试结论：

// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

pragma solidity 0.8.20;

import "hardhat/console.sol";


contract modifierTest {

address public owner;

modifier onlyOwner() {

//require(owner == msg.sender, "Ownable: caller is not the owner");

_checkOwner();

_;

}


// Gas cost: deploy--85863 add funtion--execution:901790

function add() public onlyOwner {

}


function addone() public onlyOwner {

}

function addtwo() public onlyOwner {

}


function _checkOwner() internal view virtual {

// console.log("Owner :", owner);

// console.log("Owner exec by:", msg.sender);

require(owner == msg.sender, "Ownable: caller is not the owner");

}

}

//直接在修饰器中执行逻辑

//add-require

//transaction cost:23635 execution cost:2571

//把具体逻辑放在方法中，然后再修饰器中执行

//add-_checkOwner

//transaction cost:23650 execution cost:2586

感兴趣的话，可以自己对比下add-require和add-_checkOwner的字节码，就知道什么原因是这样了

// 以下是修饰多个方法的场景消耗gas的结果

//2 add--修改两个方法

//require

//transaction cost:203979 execution cost:140181

//_checkOwner

//transaction cost:177673 execution cost:115563

//3 add--修饰三个方法

//require

//transaction cost:239072 execution cost:173012

//_checkOwner

//transaction cost:184299 execution cost:121763