第一种:取前pagesize*pagecount条记录的逆序中的前pagesize条记录,再正序过来。
它可以保证每一页都有pagesize条数据,但是可能造成最后一页和倒数第二页存在重复的现象。
select * from (
select TOP 6 * FROM (SELECT TOP 6 *
from logo_goods
Where N_CLASSES_ID = 1
ORDER BY N_GOODS_ID ASC )
as aSysTable
ORDER BY N_GOODS_ID DESC )
as bSysTable
ORDER BY N_GOODS_ID ASC
好吧,找到一个厉害的。
此转载源自
李洪根的blog.作者是微软的MVP!希望大家参考以下3种方案,按实际情况选择!
建立表:
CREATE TABLE [TestTable] (
[ID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[FirstName] [nvarchar] (100) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL ,
[LastName] [nvarchar] (100) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL ,
[Country] [nvarchar] (50) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL ,
[Note] [nvarchar] (2000) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
[ID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[FirstName] [nvarchar] (100) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL ,
[LastName] [nvarchar] (100) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL ,
[Country] [nvarchar] (50) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL ,
[Note] [nvarchar] (2000) COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
插入数据:(2万条,用更多的数据测试会明显一些)
SET IDENTITY_INSERT TestTable ON
SET IDENTITY_INSERT TestTable ON
declare @i int
set @i=1
while @i<=20000
begin
insert into TestTable([id], FirstName, LastName, Country,Note) values(@i, 'FirstName_XXX','LastName_XXX','Country_XXX','Note_XXX')
set @i=@i+1
end
set @i=1
while @i<=20000
begin
insert into TestTable([id], FirstName, LastName, Country,Note) values(@i, 'FirstName_XXX','LastName_XXX','Country_XXX','Note_XXX')
set @i=@i+1
end
SET IDENTITY_INSERT TestTable OFF
-------------------------------------
分页方案一:(利用Not In和SELECT TOP分页)
语句形式:
SELECT TOP 10 *
FROM TestTable
WHERE (ID NOT IN
(SELECT TOP 20 id
FROM TestTable
ORDER BY id))
ORDER BY ID
语句形式:
SELECT TOP 10 *
FROM TestTable
WHERE (ID NOT IN
(SELECT TOP 20 id
FROM TestTable
ORDER BY id))
ORDER BY ID
SELECT TOP 页大小 *
FROM TestTable
WHERE (ID NOT IN
(SELECT TOP 页大小*页数 id
FROM 表
ORDER BY id))
ORDER BY ID
-------------------------------------
分页方案二:(利用ID大于多少和SELECT TOP分页)
语句形式:
SELECT TOP 10 *
FROM TestTable
WHERE (ID >
(SELECT MAX(id)
FROM (SELECT TOP 20 id
FROM TestTable
ORDER BY id) AS T))
ORDER BY ID
语句形式:
SELECT TOP 10 *
FROM TestTable
WHERE (ID >
(SELECT MAX(id)
FROM (SELECT TOP 20 id
FROM TestTable
ORDER BY id) AS T))
ORDER BY ID
SELECT TOP 页大小 *
FROM TestTable
WHERE (ID >
(SELECT MAX(id)
FROM (SELECT TOP 页大小*页数 id
FROM 表
ORDER BY id) AS T))
ORDER BY ID
-------------------------------------
分页方案三:(利用SQL的游标存储过程分页)
create procedure XiaoZhengGe
@sqlstr nvarchar(4000), --查询字符串
@currentpage int, --第N页
@pagesize int --每页行数
as
set nocount on
declare @P1 int, --P1是游标的id
@rowcount int
exec sp_cursoropen @P1 output,@sqlstr,@scrollopt=1,@ccopt=1,@rowcount=@rowcount output
select ceiling( 1.0*@rowcount/@pagesize) as 总页数--,@rowcount as 总行数,@currentpage as 当前页
set @currentpage=(@currentpage-1)*@pagesize+1
exec sp_cursorfetch @P1,16,@currentpage,@pagesize
exec sp_cursorclose @P1
set nocount off
create procedure XiaoZhengGe
@sqlstr nvarchar(4000), --查询字符串
@currentpage int, --第N页
@pagesize int --每页行数
as
set nocount on
declare @P1 int, --P1是游标的id
@rowcount int
exec sp_cursoropen @P1 output,@sqlstr,@scrollopt=1,@ccopt=1,@rowcount=@rowcount output
select ceiling( 1.0*@rowcount/@pagesize) as 总页数--,@rowcount as 总行数,@currentpage as 当前页
set @currentpage=(@currentpage-1)*@pagesize+1
exec sp_cursorfetch @P1,16,@currentpage,@pagesize
exec sp_cursorclose @P1
set nocount off
其它的方案:如果没有主键,可以用临时表,也可以用方案三做,但是效率会低。
建议优化的时候,加上主键和索引,查询效率会提高。
建议优化的时候,加上主键和索引,查询效率会提高。
通过SQL 查询分析器,显示比较:我的结论是:
分页方案二:(利用ID大于多少和SELECT TOP分页)效率最高,需要拼接SQL语句
分页方案一:(利用Not In和SELECT TOP分页) 效率次之,需要拼接SQL语句
分页方案三:(利用SQL的游标存储过程分页) 效率最差,但是最为通用
分页方案二:(利用ID大于多少和SELECT TOP分页)效率最高,需要拼接SQL语句
分页方案一:(利用Not In和SELECT TOP分页) 效率次之,需要拼接SQL语句
分页方案三:(利用SQL的游标存储过程分页) 效率最差,但是最为通用
在实际情况中,要具体分析。
好吧,这里我稍微给一个奇怪的方法。
先把所有数据读下来,然后用你的网页脚本程序去循环,直到你要的记录。
如下JSP代码:
rs = state.executeQuery("Select * from logo_goods Where N_CLASSES_ID = " + classesid);
while (rs.next()){
if (i < (pagenum - 1) * pagesize){
continue;
}
if (i < pagenum * pagesize){
//读取记录,保存
}
else{
break;
}
while (rs.next()){
if (i < (pagenum - 1) * pagesize){
continue;
}
if (i < pagenum * pagesize){
//读取记录,保存
}
else{
break;
}
}
这个方法,我知道是挺废的,不过,到底废在哪里,请牛牛们指教!!