coding linux环境测试了下,实际效果一样,但是循环次数较多时,++i效率更高
实际代码段及运行log:
int64_t last_timestamps;
last_timestamps = get_steady_us();
for(int64_t i =0; i<10*10000; i++){
usleep(5);
}
WqLog(DATA,"\ni++ need [%lld] \n", get_steady_us() - last_timestamps);
last_timestamps = get_steady_us();
for(int64_t i =0; i<10*10000; ++i){
usleep(5);
}
WqLog(DATA,"\n++i need [%lld] ", get_steady_us() - last_timestamps);
测试log: