更多参考:
mod_cache:mod_disk_cache实现相对较成熟;
W3上关于HTTP Vary Header的讨论: 对于Proxy是不适合用Vary Header的
>Based on these examples, am I correctly understanding how Vary: is
>supposed to work?
Yes and no. For the request/variant scenario you listed a server SHOULD NOT
BE USING VARY: Sorry to shout, but I want it to be real clear. Vary: is
strictly for those cases where it's hopeless or excessively complicated for
a proxy to replicate what the server would do (other than storing header and
doing strict request header equality comparisons on subsequent requests).
Here's the parallel example for what you described above using the superior
method --> the URI: scheme:
对于删除过大的磁盘缓存目录:
3 1 * * * (/usr/bin/killall find; /usr/bin/find /path/to/cache/ -type f -mtime +5 |/usr/bin/xargs /bin/rm -f )
使用htcacheclean基本跟不上缓存的增长,对于过大的磁盘缓存还是要用find rm