oreilly的cos上传使用

	@RequestMapping("cosUpload")
	@ResponseBody
	public String cosUpload(HttpServletRequest request){
		String destDir = request.getServletContext().getRealPath("/") + Constant.FILE_PATH;
		try {
			FileUtils.forceMkdir(new File(destDir));
			// enctype="multipart/form-data"的form不能直接从request获取参数
			// String recipient = request.getParameter("recipient");
			// new MultipartRequest时已经把文件存在destDir目录下
			MultipartRequest multipartRequest = new MultipartRequest(request, destDir, 1024*1024, "UTF-8");
			// 转换后可以从multipartRequest获取参数
			String recipient = multipartRequest.getParameter("recipient");
			String sender = multipartRequest.getParameter("sender");
			String password = multipartRequest.getParameter("password");
			String subject = multipartRequest.getParameter("subject");
			String content = multipartRequest.getParameter("content");
			String host = multipartRequest.getParameter("host");
			@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
			Enumeration<String> fileNames = multipartRequest.getFileNames();
			List<File> fileList = new ArrayList<File>();
			while (fileNames.hasMoreElements()) {
				String fileName = fileNames.nextElement();
				File file = multipartRequest.getFile(fileName);
				fileList.add(file);
			}
			File[] files = new File[fileList.size()];
			fileList.toArray(files);
			MailUtils.send(host, sender, password, recipient, subject, content, files);
		} catch (IOException e1) {
			e1.printStackTrace();
		}
		return "success";
	}

使用cos上传，很显示获取文件外的普通参数比commons.fileupload灵活多了。而springmvc中的CommonsMultipartResolver需要添加配置，给人移植不灵活的感觉。用起来的话cos跟CommonsMultipartResolver一样。