java.lang.StringBuilder:可变的字符序列,是jdk5.0新加入的,线程不安全,效率要高于StringBuffer.
2.StringBuffer的方法与StringBuilder的方法完全一致。
StringBuffer append(String s), StringBuffer append(int n) ,
StringBuffer append(Object o) , StringBuffer append(char n),
StringBuffer append(long n), StringBuffer append(boolean n),
StringBuffer insert(int index, String str)
public StringBuffer reverse() :反转此StringBuffer
StringBuffer delete(int startIndex, int endIndex)
public char charAt(int n )
public void setCharAt(int n ,char ch)
StringBuffer replace( int startIndex ,int endIndex, String str)
public int indexOf(String str)
public String substring(int start,int end)
public int length()
总结:添加:append() 删除:delete(int i,int j) 修改:setCharAt(int index,char ch) 查 charAt(int n);
插入:insert(int index,String str) 反转:reverse() 长度:length()
3.对比String,StringBuffer,StringBuilder三者在添加上的效率:
效率从高到底: StringBuilde > StringBuffer > String
效率比较示例代码:
import org.junit.Test;
public class TestCommonClass {
@Test
public void testCompare() {
String text = "";
long startTime = 0L;
long endTime = 0L;
StringBuffer buffer = new StringBuffer("");
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder("");
startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 20000; i++) {
buffer.append(String.valueOf(i));
}
endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("StringBuffer的执行时间:" + (endTime - startTime));
startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 20000; i++) {
builder.append(String.valueOf(i));
}
endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("StringBuilder的执行时间:" + (endTime - startTime));
startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 20000; i++) {
text = text + i;
}
endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("String的执行时间:" + (endTime - startTime));
}
}
比较结果:
StringBuffer的执行时间:10
StringBuilder的执行时间:2
String的执行时间:1374