opencv-性能测量与改进技术

参考：

1、http://docs.opencv.org/3.3.0/  官方文档api

2、http://docs.opencv.org/3.3.0/d6/d00/tutorial_py_root.html 官方英文教程

3、https://opencv-python-tutroals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/py_tutorials/py_tutorials.html

4、https://github.com/makelove/OpenCV-Python-Tutorial# 进阶教程

5、https://docs.opencv.org/3.3.0/index.html  官方英文教程

6、https://github.com/abidrahmank/OpenCV2-Python-Tutorials

7、https://www.learnopencv.com/

8、http://answers.opencv.org/questions/ OpenCV论坛

注：安装的版本 opencv_python-3.3.0-cp36-cp36m-win_amd64.whl

参考：https://opencv-python-tutroals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/py_tutorials/py_tutorials.html

性能测量与改进技术

目标

• To measure the performance of your code.
• Some tips to improve the performance of your code.
• You will see these functions : cv2.getTickCount, cv2.getTickFrequency etc.

Python also provides a module time which is helpful in measuring the time of execution.

Another module profile helps to get detailed report on the code,

使用OpenCV测量性能

e1 = cv2.getTickCount()
# your code execution
e2 = cv2.getTickCount()
time = (e2 - e1)/ cv2.getTickFrequency()

import cv2
from datetime import datetime
import time

# Load two images
img1 = cv2.imread('messi5.jpg')

e1 = cv2.getTickCount()
start_time=datetime.now()
start_time2=time.time()

for i in range(5,49,2):
    img1 = cv2.medianBlur(img1,i)
e2 = cv2.getTickCount()
t = (e2 - e1)/cv2.getTickFrequency()
print(t)
print((datetime.now()-start_time).total_seconds())
print(time.time()-start_time2)

# Result I got is 0.521107655 seconds
# Load two imagesimg1 = cv2.imread('messi5.jpg')e1 = cv2.getTickCount()start_time=datetime.now()for i in range(5,49,2):    img1 = cv2.medianBlur(img1,i)e2 = cv2.getTickCount()t = (e2 - e1)/cv2.getTickFrequency()print(t)print((datetime.now()-start_time).total_seconds())# Result I got is 0.521107655 seconds

OpenCV中的默认优化

# check if optimization is enabled
In [5]: cv2.useOptimized()
Out[5]: True

In [6]: %timeit res = cv2.medianBlur(img,49)
10 loops, best of 3: 34.9 ms per loop

# Disable it
In [7]: cv2.setUseOptimized(False)

In [8]: cv2.useOptimized()
Out[8]: False

In [9]: %timeit res = cv2.medianBlur(img,49)
10 loops, best of 3: 64.1 ms per loop

测量IPython中的性能

In [10]: x = 5

In [11]: %timeit y=x**2
10000000 loops, best of 3: 73 ns per loop

In [12]: %timeit y=x*x
10000000 loops, best of 3: 58.3 ns per loop

In [15]: z = np.uint8([5])

In [17]: %timeit y=z*z
1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.25 us per loop

In [19]: %timeit y=np.square(z)
1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.16 us per loop

In [35]: %timeit z = cv2.countNonZero(img)
100000 loops, best of 3: 15.8 us per loop

In [36]: %timeit z = np.count_nonzero(img)
1000 loops, best of 3: 370 us per loop

Normally, OpenCV functions are faster than Numpy functions. So for same operation, OpenCV functions are preferred. But, there can be exceptions, especially when Numpy works with views instead of copies.

Additional Resources

1. Python Optimization Techniques
2. Scipy Lecture Notes - Advanced Numpy
3. Timing and Profiling in IPython