java为什么要用私有方法_java – 为什么模拟私有方法进入方法？

我在测试中使用PowerMockito来模拟私有方法.

validator = spy(new CommentValidator(form, request));

PowerMockito.when(

validator,

method(CommentValidator.class, "isCaptchaValid",

HttpServletRequest.class))

.withArguments(Mockito.any())

.thenReturn(true);

当我运行测试时,我在isCaptchaValid方法的第二行获得了带有NullPointerException的java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException,如下所示：

private boolean isCaptchaValid(HttpServletRequest request) {

Captcha captcha =

(Captcha) request.getSession().getAttribute("attribute");

if (captcha == null) {

log.debug(String.format("O valor do captcha da sessão esta nulo. IP: [%s]",

IPUtil.getReaderIp(request)));

return false;

}

if (captcha.isInputValid(

request.getParameter("captcha").toString().toUpperCase())) {

return true;

}

return false;

}

public final Boolean isInputValid(String pInput) {

if (getPuzzle() == null) {

if (LOGGER.isDebugEnabled()) {

LOGGER.debug("puzzle is null and invalid. Will return Boolean.FALSE");

}

return Boolean.FALSE;

}

Boolean returnValue = verifyInput(pInput);

if (LOGGER.isDebugEnabled()) {

LOGGER.debug("Validation of puzzle: " + returnValue);

}

disposePuzzle();

return returnValue;

}

如果我嘲笑它的行为,为什么要考虑方法的实现呢？有没有办法避免这种情况？我需要模拟它的原因是因为我无法提供Captcha对象.

解决方法:

问题解决了

通过电话

PowerMockito.when(

validator,

method(CommentValidator.class, "isCaptchaValid",

HttpServletRequest.class))

.withArguments(Mockito.any())

.thenReturn(true);

首先,方法本身由PowerMockito验证,因此很可能找到NPE.

为了避免这种情况,您需要反转该逻辑.

doReturn(true).when(validator, "isCaptchaValid", any(HttpServletRequest.class));

它使PowerMockito忽略了方法的主体并立即返回你想要的东西.

标签：java,unit-testing,powermockito

来源： https://codeday.me/bug/20190702/1359573.html