Author:阿冬哥
Created:2013-4-17
Blog:http://blog.csdn.net/c359719435/
Copyright 2013 阿冬哥 http://blog.csdn.net/c359719435/
使用以及转载请注明出处
1 设置socket tcp缓冲区大小的疑惑
疑惑1:通过setsockopt设置SO_SNDBUF、SO_RCVBUF这连个默认缓冲区的值,再用getsockopt获取设置的值,发现返回值是设置值的两倍。为什么?
通过网上查找,看到linux的内核代码/usr/src/linux-2.6.13.2/net/core/sock.c,找到sock_setsockopt这个函数的这段代码:
case SO_SNDBUF:
/* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think
about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to
play 'guess the biggest size' games. RCVBUF/SNDBUF
are treated in BSD as hints */
if (val > sysctl_wmem_max)//val是我们想设置的缓冲区大小的值
val = sysctl_wmem_max;//大于最大值,则val值设置成最大值
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
if ((val * ) < SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF)//val的两倍小于最小值,则设置成最小值
sk->sk_sndbuf = SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF;
else
sk->sk_sndbuf = val * ;//val的两倍大于最小值,则设置成val值的两倍
/*
* Wake up sending tasks if we
* upped the value.
*/
sk->sk_write_space(sk);
break;
case SO_RCVBUF:
/* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think
about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to
play 'guess the biggest size' games. RCVBUF/SNDBUF
are treated in BSD as hints */
if (val > sysctl_rmem_max)
val = sysctl_rmem_max;
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
/* FIXME: is this lower bound the right one? */<