python super().__init__()参数,Python中的super（）.__ init __（）和显式超类__init __（）之间的行为差​​异...

I am getting an unexplained difference in behavior between using super().__init__() and explicitly calling a super class constructor in my code.

class IPElement(object):

def __init__(self, ip_type='IPv4'):

self.ip_type = ip_type

class IPAddressSimple(IPElement):

def __init__(self, ip_name, ip_type='IPv4'):

self.ip_name = ip_name

super().__init__(self, ip_type=ip_type)

Here, the line super().__init__(self, ip_type=ip_type) results in a type error:

TypeError: __init__() got multiple values for argument 'ip_type'

When I change the call to pass ip_type by position (e.g. super().__init__(self, ip_type) I get a different type error:

TypeError: __init__() takes from 1 to 2 positional arguments but 3 were given

Neither of these errors makes sense to me, and when I replace super() with the explicit name of the superclass, everything works as expected. The following works just fine, as does passing ip_type by position:

class IPAddressSimple(IPElement):

def __init__(self, ip_name, ip_type='IPv4'):

self.ip_name = ip_name

IPElement.__init__(self, ip_type=ip_type)

I can certainly use an explicit call to the superclass __init__ method if necessary, but I would like to understand why super() is not working here.

解决方案

super() already passes self along for you. super(IPAddressSimple) would not know about self, so in that case you'd need to call super(IPAddressSimple).__init__(self, ip_type). But super() (which is syntactic sugar for super(IPAddressSimple, self)) knows self and handles it, so you should only pass ip_type manually.