持有对象---Arrays.asList()和Collections.addAll()的性能比较

• • import java.util.ArrayList; 
    import java.util.Arrays; 
    import java.util.Collections; 
    import java.util.List; 
    public class ArraysCompareCollectionsTest { 
    public static void main(String[] args) { 
    int count = 10000000;//通过改变循环次数来放大或放小结果 
    System.out.println("Arrays's time is " + arraysTest(count)); 
    System.out.println("Collections's time is " + collectionsTest(count)); 
    } 
    public static long arraysTest(int count) { 
    long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); 
    for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { 
    List arrays = new ArrayList (); 
    arrays.addAll(Arrays.asList("hello", "java", "world")); 
    } 
    return System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime; 
    }public static long collectionsTest(int count) { 
    long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); 
    for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { 
    List arrays = new ArrayList (); 
    Collections.addAll(arrays,"hello", "java", "world"); 
    } 
    return System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime; 
    } 
    } 
    

    二、控制台输出结果分析

    
    

    1.当count=100000时,Collections的运行速度比Arrays的要快60ms左右

    
    

    2.当count=1000000时,Collections的运行速度比Arrays的要快100ms左右

    
    

    3.当count=10000000时,Collections的运行速度比Arrays的要快更多

  •  

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/alagong/p/10274712.html