移动139邮箱不接收监控邮件

最近这两天没有收到DB的监控邮件，通过对邮件日志的分析，发现了如下信息：

# tail -f /var/spool/mail/root

...... 

Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)

This is a MIME-encapsulated message

--p4C24DBY021092.1305165853/localhost.localdomain

The original message was received at Thu, 12 May 2011 10:04:13 +0800

from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

<xxxxxx@139.com>

    (reason: 550 Requested action not taken: mail eawQrJDrH9sfQMtNISs4AA--.333S2 is rejected, 1767)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----

... while talking to mx1.mail.139.com.:

>>> DATA

<<< 550 Requested action not taken: mail eawQrJDrH9sfQMtNISs4AA--.333S2 is rejected, 1767

554 5.0.0 Service unavailable

 

--p4C24DBY021092.1305165853/localhost.localdomain

Content-Type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; localhost.localdomain

Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost.localdomain

Arrival-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:04:13 +0800

Final-Recipient: RFC822; xxxxxxxxxx@139.com

Action: failed

Status: 5.2.0

Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.mail.139.com

Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Requested action not taken: mail eawQrJDrH9sfQMtNISs4AA--.333S2 is rejected, 1767

Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:04:13 +0800

...... 

 

 通过以上的日志片段得知应该是在发送邮件时被mail server rejected了。通过命令行模式测试一下整个发送邮件的过程：

# telnet mx1.mail .139 .com   25
Trying  221.176.9.178 ...
Connected to mx1.mail .139 .com ( 221.176.9.178 ).
Escape character is '^]'.
220   139 .com Anti-spam GT for Coremail System (caixun [ 20100128 ] ) 
HELO   $mailDomain（即@符后面的东东）
250  OK
MAIL FROM:<root@$mailDomain>
250  Mail OK 
RCPT TO:< $mailboxName >
250  Mail OK 
DATA
354  End data with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF>
此处输入邮件内容
.

450 Requested action not taken: d6wQrJCLT7i_QctN8UA4AA--.475S2, please try again

 

在邮件最后出现了问题，针对此问题搜索了一下，用以下方法解决了此问题：

vi /etc/mail/sendmail.cf

找到

#Dj$w.Foo.COM 

在后面添加自己的邮件域，重启sendmail，发邮件成功。

参考：

http://www.5dmail.net/html/2006-11-1/2006111120755.htm 

http://blog.csdn.net/remotesupport/archive/2011/02/27/6211883.aspx 

 

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/minglog/archive/2011/05/12/2044145.html