__new__是静态方法允许一个用例当你创建一个子类的实例:
return super(, cls).__new__(subcls, *args, **kwargs)
如果new是一个类方法,则上面的写为:
return super(, cls).new(*args, **kwargs)
并且没有地方放置subcls。
I don’t really see when that would be a proper use of __new__, though. Maybe I’m not seeing it, but that just seems to me to be a completely pathological use of it (and it should be said, that if you still really want it, then you could access it with object.__new__.__func__). At the very least, I find it very hard to imagine that it would have been the reason for Guido to change __new__ from being a class method to a static method.
class Base(object):
@classmethod
def new(cls):
print("Base.new(%r)" % (cls,))
return cls()
class UseSuper(Base):
@classmethod
def new(cls):
print("UseSuper.new(%r)" % (cls,))
return super(UseSuper, cls).new() # passes cls as the first arg
class NoSuper(Base):
@classmethod
def new(cls):
print("NoSuper.new(%r)" % (cls,))
return Base.new() # passes Base as the first arg
class UseFunc(Base):
@classmethod
def new(cls):
print("UseFunc.new(%r)" % (cls,))
return Base.new.im_func(cls) # or `.__func__(cls)`. # passes cls as the first arg
print(UseSuper.new())
print('-'*60)
print(NoSuper.new())
print('-'*60)
print(UseFunc.new())