Because I think there would be bad performance I don’t want to write the DataTable to a CSV file and do the insert from there with the MySqlBulkLoader class.
不排除基于毫无根据的假设的可能解决方案.我刚刚在Transaction中使用标准的MySqlDataAdapter #Update()测试了从System.Data.DataTable插入100,000行到MySQL表中.它一直需要大约30秒才能运行:
using (MySqlTransaction tran = conn.BeginTransaction(System.Data.IsolationLevel.Serializable))
{
using (MySqlCommand cmd = new MySqlCommand())
{
cmd.Connection = conn;
cmd.Transaction = tran;
cmd.CommandText = "SELECT * FROM testtable";
using (MySqlDataAdapter da = new MySqlDataAdapter(cmd))
{
da.UpdateBatchSize = 1000;
using (MySqlCommandBuilder cb = new MySqlCommandBuilder(da))
{
da.Update(rawData);
tran.Commit();
}
}
}
}
(我为UpdateBatchSize尝试了几个不同的值,但它们似乎没有对经过的时间产生重大影响.)
相比之下,使用MySqlBulkLoader的以下代码只需要5或6秒就可以运行…
string tempCsvFileSpec = @"C:\Users\Gord\Desktop\dump.csv";
using (StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter(tempCsvFileSpec))
{
Rfc4180Writer.WriteDataTable(rawData, writer, false);
}
var msbl = new MySqlBulkLoader(conn);
msbl.TableName = "testtable";
msbl.FileName = tempCsvFileSpec;
msbl.FieldTerminator = ",";
msbl.FieldQuotationCharacter = '"';
msbl.Load();
System.IO.File.Delete(tempCsvFileSpec);
…包括从DataTable转储100,000行到临时CSV文件(使用类似于this的代码)的时间,从该文件批量加载,以及之后删除文件.