java ifpresent_Returning from Java Optional ifPresent()

The ideal solution is “command-query separation”: Make one method (command) for doing something with the string if it is present. And another method (query) to tell you whether it was there.

However, we don’t live an ideal world, and perfect solutions are never possible. If in your situation you cannot separate command and query, my taste is for the idea already presented by shmosel: map to a boolean. As a detail I would use filter rather than the inner if statement:

public boolean checkSomethingIfPresent() {

return mightReturnAString().filter(item -> item.equals("something"))

.map(item -> {

// Do some other stuff like use "something" in API calls

return true; // (compiles)

})

.orElse(false);

}

What I don’t like about it is that the call chain has a side effect, which is not normally expected except from ifPresent and ifPresentOrElse (and orElseThrow, of course).

If we insist on using ifPresent to make the side effect clearer, that is possible:

AtomicBoolean result = new AtomicBoolean(false);

mightReturnAString().filter(item -> item.equals("something"))

.ifPresent(item -> {

// Do some other stuff like use "something" in API calls

result.set(true);

});

return result.get();

I use AtomicBoolean as a container for the result since we would not be allowed to assign to a primitive boolean from within the lambda. We don’t need its atomicity, but it doesn’t harm either.

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值