Tinker源码解析

最新推荐文章于 2019-12-11 15:08:10 发布
最新推荐文章于 2019-12-11 15:08:10 发布
阅读量431 收藏
点赞数
文章标签： 设计模式
原文链接：https://juejin.im/post/5a371749f265da4325296305
版权

###源码分析入口-TinkerInstaller.install

分析源码最好从调用的入口进行入手分析，因此我们从TinkerInstaller.install入手：

//TinkerInstaller.install(mApplicationLike);
TinkerInstaller.install(
        mApplicationLike,
        new DefaultLoadReporter(getApplication()),
        new DefaultPatchReporter(getApplication()),
        sCustomPatchListener,
        CustomResultService.class,
        new UpgradePatch()
);
复制代码

TinkerInstaller的设计应用到了外观模式，相关的核心逻辑方法都由Tinker类来完成：

public class TinkerInstaller {
    private static final String TAG = "Tinker.TinkerInstaller";

    public static Tinker install(ApplicationLike applicationLike) {
        Tinker tinker = new Tinker.Builder(applicationLike.getApplication()).build();
        Tinker.create(tinker);
        tinker.install(applicationLike.getTinkerResultIntent());
        return tinker;
    }

    public static Tinker install(ApplicationLike applicationLike, LoadReporter loadReporter, PatchReporter patchReporter,
                               PatchListener listener, Class<? extends AbstractResultService> resultServiceClass,
                               AbstractPatch upgradePatchProcessor) {

        Tinker tinker = new Tinker.Builder(applicationLike.getApplication())
            .tinkerFlags(applicationLike.getTinkerFlags())
            .loadReport(loadReporter)
            .listener(listener)
            .patchReporter(patchReporter)
            .tinkerLoadVerifyFlag(applicationLike.getTinkerLoadVerifyFlag()).build();

        Tinker.create(tinker);
        tinker.install(applicationLike.getTinkerResultIntent(), resultServiceClass, upgradePatchProcessor);
        return tinker;
    }

    public static void cleanPatch(Context context) {
        Tinker.with(context).cleanPatch();
    }

    public static void onReceiveUpgradePatch(Context context, String patchLocation) {
        Tinker.with(context).getPatchListener().onPatchReceived(patchLocation);
    }

    public static void setLogIml(TinkerLog.TinkerLogImp imp) {
        TinkerLog.setTinkerLogImp(imp);
    }
}
复制代码

因此，我们的关注点转移到Tinker类中，下面是省略后的Tinker代码，可以明确得看到：Tinker是一个单利，这里也用到了Builder模式来构建Tinker的单利：

public class Tinker {
    private static final String TAG = "Tinker.Tinker";

    private static Tinker sInstance;
    private static boolean sInstalled = false;

    final Context       context;
    final File          patchDirectory;
    final PatchListener listener;
    final LoadReporter  loadReporter;
    final PatchReporter patchReporter;
    final File          patchInfoFile;
    final File          patchInfoLockFile;
    final boolean       isMainProcess;
    final boolean       isPatchProcess;
    final boolean       tinkerLoadVerifyFlag;
    int              tinkerFlags;
    TinkerLoadResult tinkerLoadResult;
    private boolean loaded = false;

    private Tinker(Context context, int tinkerFlags, LoadReporter loadReporter, PatchReporter patchReporter,
                   PatchListener listener, File patchDirectory, File patchInfoFile, File patchInfoLockFile,
                   boolean isInMainProc, boolean isPatchProcess, boolean tinkerLoadVerifyFlag) {
        this.context = context;
        this.listener = listener;
        this.loadReporter = loadReporter;
        this.patchReporter = patchReporter;
        this.tinkerFlags = tinkerFlags;
        this.patchDirectory = patchDirectory;
        this.patchInfoFile = patchInfoFile;
        this.patchInfoLockFile = patchInfoLockFile;
        this.isMainProcess = isInMainProc;
        this.tinkerLoadVerifyFlag = tinkerLoadVerifyFlag;
        this.isPatchProcess = isPatchProcess;
    }

    public static Tinker with(Context context) {
        if (!sInstalled) {
            throw new TinkerRuntimeException("you must install tinker before get tinker sInstance");
        }
        if (sInstance == null) {
            synchronized (Tinker.class) {
                if (sInstance == null) {
                    sInstance = new Builder(context).build();
                }
            }
        }
        return sInstance;
    }

    public static void create(Tinker tinker) {
        if (sInstance != null) {
            throw new TinkerRuntimeException("Tinker instance is already set.");
        }
        sInstance = tinker;
    }

    public void install(Intent intentResult, Class<? extends AbstractResultService> serviceClass,
                        AbstractPatch upgradePatch) {
        sInstalled = true;
        TinkerPatchService.setPatchProcessor(upgradePatch, serviceClass);

        TinkerLog.i(TAG, "try to install tinker, isEnable: %b, version: %s", isTinkerEnabled(), ShareConstants.TINKER_VERSION);

        if (!isTinkerEnabled()) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "tinker is disabled");
            return;
        }
        if (intentResult == null) {
            throw new TinkerRuntimeException("intentResult must not be null.");
        }
        tinkerLoadResult = new TinkerLoadResult();
        tinkerLoadResult.parseTinkerResult(getContext(), intentResult);
        //after load code set
        loadReporter.onLoadResult(patchDirectory, tinkerLoadResult.loadCode, tinkerLoadResult.costTime);

        if (!loaded) {
            TinkerLog.w(TAG, "tinker load fail!");
        }
    }

    public static class Builder {
        private final Context context;
        private final boolean mainProcess;
        private final boolean patchProcess;

        private int status = -1;
        private LoadReporter  loadReporter;
        private PatchReporter patchReporter;
        private PatchListener listener;
        private File          patchDirectory;
        private File          patchInfoFile;
        private File          patchInfoLockFile;
        private Boolean       tinkerLoadVerifyFlag;

        public Builder(Context context) {
            if (context == null) {
                throw new TinkerRuntimeException("Context must not be null.");
            }
            this.context = context;
            this.mainProcess = TinkerServiceInternals.isInMainProcess(context);
            this.patchProcess = TinkerServiceInternals.isInTinkerPatchServiceProcess(context);
            this.patchDirectory = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchDirectory(context);
            if (this.patchDirectory == null) {
                TinkerLog.e(TAG, "patchDirectory is null!");
                return;
            }
            this.patchInfoFile = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchInfoFile(patchDirectory.getAbsolutePath());
            this.patchInfoLockFile = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchInfoLockFile(patchDirectory.getAbsolutePath());
            TinkerLog.w(TAG, "tinker patch directory: %s", patchDirectory);
        }
		//省略一部分代码
    }

}
```

很简单地，通过with方法就可以获取一个Tinker的实例。

###源码分析入口-TinkerInstaller.onReceiveUpgradePatch

另外一个入口就是我们加载Patch的时候调用到了TinkerInstaller.onReceiveUpgradePatch：

```java
TinkerInstaller.onReceiveUpgradePatch(getApplication(), path);
```

也就是调用：

```java
public static void onReceiveUpgradePatch(Context context, String patchLocation) {
    Tinker.with(context).getPatchListener().onPatchReceived(patchLocation);
}
```

这里先获取了Tinker实例，然后获取PatchListener，最终调用PatchListener的onPatchReceived方法。其中PatchListener是一个接口，默认的实现是DefaultPatchListener：

```java
public class DefaultPatchListener implements PatchListener {
    protected final Context context;

    public DefaultPatchListener(Context context) {
        this.context = context;
    }

    @Override
    public int onPatchReceived(String path) {
        File patchFile = new File(path);

        int returnCode = patchCheck(path, SharePatchFileUtil.getMD5(patchFile));

        if (returnCode == ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_OK) {
            TinkerPatchService.runPatchService(context, path);
        } else {
            Tinker.with(context).getLoadReporter().onLoadPatchListenerReceiveFail(new File(path), returnCode);
        }
        return returnCode;
    }

    protected int patchCheck(String path, String patchMd5) {
        Tinker manager = Tinker.with(context);
        //check SharePreferences also
        if (!manager.isTinkerEnabled() || !ShareTinkerInternals.isTinkerEnableWithSharedPreferences(context)) {
            return ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_DISABLE;
        }
        File file = new File(path);

        if (!SharePatchFileUtil.isLegalFile(file)) {
            return ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_NOTEXIST;
        }

        //patch service can not send request
        if (manager.isPatchProcess()) {
            return ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_INSERVICE;
        }

        //if the patch service is running, pending
        if (TinkerServiceInternals.isTinkerPatchServiceRunning(context)) {
            return ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_RUNNING;
        }
        if (ShareTinkerInternals.isVmJit()) {
            return ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_JIT;
        }

        Tinker tinker = Tinker.with(context);

        if (tinker.isTinkerLoaded()) {
            TinkerLoadResult tinkerLoadResult = tinker.getTinkerLoadResultIfPresent();
            if (tinkerLoadResult != null && !tinkerLoadResult.useInterpretMode) {
                String currentVersion = tinkerLoadResult.currentVersion;
                if (patchMd5.equals(currentVersion)) {
                    return ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_ALREADY_APPLY;
                }
            }
        }

        if (!UpgradePatchRetry.getInstance(context).onPatchListenerCheck(patchMd5)) {
            return ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_RETRY_COUNT_LIMIT;
        }

        return ShareConstants.ERROR_PATCH_OK;
    }
}
```

分析onPatchReceived方法可以知道最核心的是调用了TinkerPatchService的runPatchService：

```java
TinkerPatchService.runPatchService(context, path);
```

TinkerPatchService的runPatchService方法完成了Patch的加载以及合并。TinkerPatchService的具体实现如下：

```java
public class TinkerPatchService extends IntentService {

    public TinkerPatchService() {
        super(com.tencent.tinker.lib.service.TinkerPatchService.class.getSimpleName());
    }

    //开启TinkerPatchService
    public static void runPatchService(Context context, String path) {
        try {
            Intent intent = new Intent(context, com.tencent.tinker.lib.service.TinkerPatchService.class);
            intent.putExtra(PATCH_PATH_EXTRA, path);
            intent.putExtra(RESULT_CLASS_EXTRA, resultServiceClass.getName());
            context.startService(intent);
        } catch (Throwable throwable) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "start patch service fail, exception:" + throwable);
        }
    }

    //设置upgradePatch
    public static void setPatchProcessor(AbstractPatch upgradePatch, Class<? extends AbstractResultService> serviceClass) {
        upgradePatchProcessor = upgradePatch;
        resultServiceClass = serviceClass;
        try {
            Class.forName(serviceClass.getName());
        } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
        }
    }

    //最核心的加载与合并Patch的逻辑
    @Override
    protected void onHandleIntent(Intent intent) {
        final Context context = getApplicationContext();
        Tinker tinker = Tinker.with(context);

        //开始PatchReporter，开始Patch的加载
        tinker.getPatchReporter().onPatchServiceStart(intent);

        if (intent == null) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "TinkerPatchService received a null intent, ignoring.");
            return;
        }
        String path = getPatchPathExtra(intent);
        if (path == null) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "TinkerPatchService can't get the path extra, ignoring.");
            return;
        }
        File patchFile = new File(path);

        long begin = SystemClock.elapsedRealtime();
        boolean result;
        long cost;
        Throwable e = null;

        increasingPriority();
        PatchResult patchResult = new PatchResult();
        try {
            if (upgradePatchProcessor == null) {
                throw new TinkerRuntimeException("upgradePatchProcessor is null.");
            }

            //Patch合并的逻辑都在tryPatch里面
            result = upgradePatchProcessor.tryPatch(context, path, patchResult);

        } catch (Throwable throwable) {
            e = throwable;
            result = false;
            tinker.getPatchReporter().onPatchException(patchFile, e);
        }

        cost = SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - begin;
        tinker.getPatchReporter().
                onPatchResult(patchFile, result, cost);

        patchResult.isSuccess = result;
        patchResult.rawPatchFilePath = path;
        patchResult.costTime = cost;
        patchResult.e = e;

        //处理结果，这里可以进行扩展，例如防止应用重启
        AbstractResultService.runResultService(context, patchResult, getPatchResultExtra(intent));
    }
    
}
```

TinkerPatchService里面有几个很重要的方法，笔者都分别加上注释了。最核心的加载与合并Patch的逻辑onHandleIntent里面的AbstractPatch.tryPatch方法。

而AbstractPatch的具体默认实现是UpgradePatch（从前面的install方法可以看出来），下面将进入Tinker的核心逻辑，也就是UpgradePatch的tryPatch方法：

```java
public class UpgradePatch extends AbstractPatch {
    private static final String TAG = "Tinker.UpgradePatch";

    @Override
    public boolean tryPatch(Context context, String tempPatchPath, PatchResult patchResult) {
        Tinker manager = Tinker.with(context);

        final File patchFile = new File(tempPatchPath);

        if (!manager.isTinkerEnabled() || !ShareTinkerInternals.isTinkerEnableWithSharedPreferences(context)) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patch is disabled, just return");
            return false;
        }

        if (!SharePatchFileUtil.isLegalFile(patchFile)) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patch file is not found, just return");
            return false;
        }
        //check the signature, we should create a new checker
        ShareSecurityCheck signatureCheck = new ShareSecurityCheck(context);

        int returnCode = ShareTinkerInternals.checkTinkerPackage(context, manager.getTinkerFlags(), patchFile, signatureCheck);
        if (returnCode != ShareConstants.ERROR_PACKAGE_CHECK_OK) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:onPatchPackageCheckFail");
            manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchPackageCheckFail(patchFile, returnCode);
            return false;
        }

        String patchMd5 = SharePatchFileUtil.getMD5(patchFile);
        if (patchMd5 == null) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patch md5 is null, just return");
            return false;
        }
        //use md5 as version
        patchResult.patchVersion = patchMd5;

        TinkerLog.i(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patchMd5:%s", patchMd5);

        //check ok, we can real recover a new patch
        final String patchDirectory = manager.getPatchDirectory().getAbsolutePath();

        File patchInfoLockFile = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchInfoLockFile(patchDirectory);
        File patchInfoFile = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchInfoFile(patchDirectory);

        SharePatchInfo oldInfo = SharePatchInfo.readAndCheckPropertyWithLock(patchInfoFile, patchInfoLockFile);

        //it is a new patch, so we should not find a exist
        SharePatchInfo newInfo;

        //already have patch
        if (oldInfo != null) {
            if (oldInfo.oldVersion == null || oldInfo.newVersion == null || oldInfo.oatDir == null) {
                TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:onPatchInfoCorrupted");
                manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchInfoCorrupted(patchFile, oldInfo.oldVersion, oldInfo.newVersion);
                return false;
            }

            if (!SharePatchFileUtil.checkIfMd5Valid(patchMd5)) {
                TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:onPatchVersionCheckFail md5 %s is valid", patchMd5);
                manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchVersionCheckFail(patchFile, oldInfo, patchMd5);
                return false;
            }
            // if it is interpret now, use changing flag to wait main process
            final String finalOatDir = oldInfo.oatDir.equals(ShareConstants.INTERPRET_DEX_OPTIMIZE_PATH)
                ? ShareConstants.CHANING_DEX_OPTIMIZE_PATH : oldInfo.oatDir;
            newInfo = new SharePatchInfo(oldInfo.oldVersion, patchMd5, Build.FINGERPRINT, finalOatDir);
        } else {
            newInfo = new SharePatchInfo("", patchMd5, Build.FINGERPRINT, ShareConstants.DEFAULT_DEX_OPTIMIZE_PATH);
        }

        //it is a new patch, we first delete if there is any files
        //don't delete dir for faster retry
//        SharePatchFileUtil.deleteDir(patchVersionDirectory);
        final String patchName = SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchVersionDirectory(patchMd5);

        final String patchVersionDirectory = patchDirectory + "/" + patchName;

        TinkerLog.i(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:patchVersionDirectory:%s", patchVersionDirectory);

        //copy file
        File destPatchFile = new File(patchVersionDirectory + "/" + SharePatchFileUtil.getPatchVersionFile(patchMd5));

        try {
            // check md5 first
            if (!patchMd5.equals(SharePatchFileUtil.getMD5(destPatchFile))) {
                SharePatchFileUtil.copyFileUsingStream(patchFile, destPatchFile);
                TinkerLog.w(TAG, "UpgradePatch copy patch file, src file: %s size: %d, dest file: %s size:%d", patchFile.getAbsolutePath(), patchFile.length(),
                    destPatchFile.getAbsolutePath(), destPatchFile.length());
            }
        } catch (IOException e) {
//            e.printStackTrace();
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:copy patch file fail from %s to %s", patchFile.getPath(), destPatchFile.getPath());
            manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchTypeExtractFail(patchFile, destPatchFile, patchFile.getName(), ShareConstants.TYPE_PATCH_FILE);
            return false;
        }

        //we use destPatchFile instead of patchFile, because patchFile may be deleted during the patch process
        if (!DexDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverDexFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch dex failed");
            return false;
        }

        if (!BsDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverLibraryFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch library failed");
            return false;
        }

        if (!ResDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverResourceFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch resource failed");
            return false;
        }

        // check dex opt file at last, some phone such as VIVO/OPPO like to change dex2oat to interpreted
        if (!DexDiffPatchInternal.waitAndCheckDexOptFile(patchFile, manager)) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, check dex opt file failed");
            return false;
        }

        if (!SharePatchInfo.rewritePatchInfoFileWithLock(patchInfoFile, newInfo, patchInfoLockFile)) {
            TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, rewrite patch info failed");
            manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchInfoCorrupted(patchFile, newInfo.oldVersion, newInfo.newVersion);
            return false;
        }

        TinkerLog.w(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch: done, it is ok");
        return true;
    }

}
```

###Tinker核心逻辑

前面都是一些MD5、签名的校验，最核心的是：

```java
//we use destPatchFile instead of patchFile, because patchFile may be deleted during the patch process
if (!DexDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverDexFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
    TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch dex failed");
    return false;
}

if (!BsDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverLibraryFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
    TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch library failed");
    return false;
}

if (!ResDiffPatchInternal.tryRecoverResourceFiles(manager, signatureCheck, context, patchVersionDirectory, destPatchFile)) {
    TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, try patch resource failed");
    return false;
}

// check dex opt file at last, some phone such as VIVO/OPPO like to change dex2oat to interpreted
if (!DexDiffPatchInternal.waitAndCheckDexOptFile(patchFile, manager)) {
    TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, check dex opt file failed");
    return false;
}

if (!SharePatchInfo.rewritePatchInfoFileWithLock(patchInfoFile, newInfo, patchInfoLockFile)) {
    TinkerLog.e(TAG, "UpgradePatch tryPatch:new patch recover, rewrite patch info failed");
    manager.getPatchReporter().onPatchInfoCorrupted(patchFile, newInfo.oldVersion, newInfo.newVersion);
    return false;
}
```

这里分别调用不同的Diff算法，处理了Dex（代码）、so、资源等。这里以Dex文件的处理为例进行讲解，一路分析tryRecoverDexFiles，最终会发现是调用了DexPatchApplier的executeAndSaveTo方法：

```java
public void executeAndSaveTo(OutputStream out) throws IOException {
    // Before executing, we should check if this patch can be applied to
    // old dex we passed in.
    byte[] oldDexSign = this.oldDex.computeSignature(false);
    if (oldDexSign == null) {
        throw new IOException("failed to compute old dex's signature.");
    }
    if (this.patchFile == null) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("patch file is null.");
    }
    byte[] oldDexSignInPatchFile = this.patchFile.getOldDexSignature();
    if (CompareUtils.uArrCompare(oldDexSign, oldDexSignInPatchFile) != 0) {
        throw new IOException(
                String.format(
                        "old dex signature mismatch! expected: %s, actual: %s",
                        Arrays.toString(oldDexSign),
                        Arrays.toString(oldDexSignInPatchFile)
                )
        );
    }

    // Firstly, set sections' offset after patched, sort according to their offset so that
    // the dex lib of aosp can calculate section size.
    TableOfContents patchedToc = this.patchedDex.getTableOfContents();

    patchedToc.header.off = 0;
    patchedToc.header.size = 1;
    patchedToc.mapList.size = 1;

    //获取Patch文件中的Dex文件的分区以及子分区的相关偏移量

    patchedToc.stringIds.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedStringIdSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.typeIds.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedTypeIdSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.typeLists.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedTypeListSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.protoIds.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedProtoIdSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.fieldIds.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedFieldIdSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.methodIds.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedMethodIdSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.classDefs.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedClassDefSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.mapList.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedMapListSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.stringDatas.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedStringDataSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.annotations.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedAnnotationSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.annotationSets.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedAnnotationSetSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.annotationSetRefLists.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedAnnotationSetRefListSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.annotationsDirectories.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedAnnotationsDirectorySectionOffset();
    patchedToc.encodedArrays.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedEncodedArraySectionOffset();
    patchedToc.debugInfos.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedDebugInfoSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.codes.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedCodeSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.classDatas.off
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedClassDataSectionOffset();
    patchedToc.fileSize
            = this.patchFile.getPatchedDexSize();

    Arrays.sort(patchedToc.sections);

    patchedToc.computeSizesFromOffsets();

    //获取存在BUG的Dex文件的分区以及子分区的相关偏移量

    // Secondly, run patch algorithms according to sections' dependencies.
    this.stringDataSectionPatchAlg = new StringDataSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.typeIdSectionPatchAlg = new TypeIdSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.protoIdSectionPatchAlg = new ProtoIdSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.fieldIdSectionPatchAlg = new FieldIdSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.methodIdSectionPatchAlg = new MethodIdSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.classDefSectionPatchAlg = new ClassDefSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.typeListSectionPatchAlg = new TypeListSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.annotationSetRefListSectionPatchAlg = new AnnotationSetRefListSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.annotationSetSectionPatchAlg = new AnnotationSetSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.classDataSectionPatchAlg = new ClassDataSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.codeSectionPatchAlg = new CodeSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.debugInfoSectionPatchAlg = new DebugInfoItemSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.annotationSectionPatchAlg = new AnnotationSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.encodedArraySectionPatchAlg = new StaticValueSectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );
    this.annotationsDirectorySectionPatchAlg = new AnnotationsDirectorySectionPatchAlgorithm(
            patchFile, oldDex, patchedDex, oldToPatchedIndexMap
    );

    //将Patch文件中的Dex文件的分区以及子分区的相关偏移量应用到有BUG的Dex文件中

    this.stringDataSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.typeIdSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.typeListSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.protoIdSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.fieldIdSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.methodIdSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.annotationSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.annotationSetSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.annotationSetRefListSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.annotationsDirectorySectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.debugInfoSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.codeSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.classDataSectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.encodedArraySectionPatchAlg.execute();
    this.classDefSectionPatchAlg.execute();

    // Thirdly, write header, mapList. Calculate and write patched dex's sign and checksum.
    Dex.Section headerOut = this.patchedDex.openSection(patchedToc.header.off);
    patchedToc.writeHeader(headerOut);

    Dex.Section mapListOut = this.patchedDex.openSection(patchedToc.mapList.off);
    patchedToc.writeMap(mapListOut);

    this.patchedDex.writeHashes();

    // Finally, write patched dex to file.
    this.patchedDex.writeTo(out);
}
```

这里干了3个核心逻辑：

1. 获取Patch文件中的Dex文件的分区以及子分区的相关偏移量
2. 获取存在BUG的Dex文件的分区以及子分区的相关偏移量
3. 将Patch文件中的Dex文件的分区以及子分区的相关偏移量通过不同的算法应用到有BUG的Dex文件中

其余的so、资源文件的处理都是分别通过不同Diff算法进行处理的，这里就不再赘述了，原理都差不多。

###结语

到此为止，Tinker的核心流程就分析完毕了。在这次源码分析中，我们学会了Tinker是如何利用单例模式、Builder模式等设计模式进行设计，然后也学习到了不同类之间是如何分工合作的。当然最重要的是我们掌握了Tinker最核心的Diff算法。
复制代码
weixin_34235371
关注
Tinker源码解析系列—补丁合成与加载
Horace
01-21 530
引言  上次我们分析了Tinker中关于Application的代理机制，这次我们来分析一下Tinker是如何进行补丁的合成与加载的。 上一篇我们讲了 Tinker源码解析系列—Application代理机制 阅读本文可能需要花费10分钟。 以下所有对源码的分析均基于Tinker 1.7.7 版本，且由于源码过长，均只贴出关键部分 Tinker中比较关键的几个类 在开始分析补丁合成和加...
Android 热修复 Tinker接入及源码浅析
weixin_34292924的博客
02-06 601
本文已在我的公众号hongyangAndroid首发。转载请标明出处：gold.xitu.io/post/589736…本文出自张鸿洋的博客 一、概述 放了一个大长假，happy，先祝大家2017年笑口常开。 热修复这项技术，基本上已经成为项目比较重要的模块了。主要因为项目在上线之后，都难免会有各种问题，而依靠发版去修复问题，成本太高了。 现在热修复的技术基本上有阿里的AndFix、QZone...
Tinker接入及源码分析（一）
钢铁烈阳--非花非雾
01-10 902
转载地址：http://qlm.pw/2017/01/07/tinker接入及源码分析（一）/ 该系列文章分析基于 Tinker1.7.6 版本 Tinker项目地址：https://github.com/Tencent/tinker Tinker接入及源码分析（一）：简单介绍以及如何接入 Tinker接入及源码分析（二）：加载补丁源码分析 Tinker接入及源码分析
tinker源码分析
饭饭哥的博客
05-17 726
一、基础信息相关验证 从服务器下载patch包之后，开始加载patch包合并全量的dex，合并之前要对patch进行一系列的验证，首先进入onPatchReceived(String path) 方法 1.判断!manager.isTinkerEnabled() || !ShareTinkerInternals.isTinkerEnableWithSharedPreferences(cont
tinker -源码分析
孑书力的博客
01-29 836
Tinker 思想全量替换新的Dex。它更像是APP的增量更新， 在服务器端通过差异性算法，计算出新旧dex之间的差异包，推送到客户端，进行合成 区别在于不再将patch.dex增加到elements数组中，而是差量的方式给出patch.dex，然后将patch.dex与应用的classes.dex合并，然后整体替换掉旧的DEX文件，以达到修复的目的。//data/dat/包名/tinker
upcsyq#article#热更新开源项目Tinker源码解析之Library热更新1
07-25
所以想要加载最新的库，需要自己使用TinkerInstaller.load*Library去加载库文件，它会自动尝试先去Tinker中的库文件加载，加载不成功会
Tinker源码解析系列—Application代理机制
Horace
01-21 626
引言 我们知道Tinker实现热修复的原理是将自己的全量patch包插入到dexElements数组的前段，从而达到热修复的目的。 以下所有对源码的分析均基于Tinker 1.7.7 版本 Application代理机制 通常我们都是在Application中进行一些初始化的工作，包括tinker的初始化，那么application中所涉及到的类，在tinker初始化完成前就已经被类加...
Android-Patcher:Tinker V1.7.5原始码解析-源码解析
03-24
Tinker V1.7.5源码解析将帮助我们深入理解其内部机制，为开发人员提供更高效的调试和优化策略。 源码解析主要涵盖以下几个关键知识点： 1. **热修复原理**：Tinker的热修复技术基于Android的 DexClassLoader 和 ...
Tinker源码分析
joye123的博客
07-07 1526
Tinker撸码APK Diff 生成补丁Tinker接入方式有两种：gradle插件和命令行。 两者只是配置参数输入源不同，前者是读取gradle文件，后者是读取命令行参数。 入口类分别是//com.tencent.tinker.build.gradle.task.TinkerPatchSchemaTask @TaskAction def tinkerPatch() {
Android热修复Tinker接入及源码解读
08-26
热修复这项技术，基本上已经成为项目比较重要的模块了。主要因为项目在上线之后，都难免会有各种问题本文讲述了Android热修复Tinker接入及源码解读
Tinker项目源码及工具
12-22
Tinker项目源码及使用命令行生成patch文件所需要的工具
Tinker 热修复原理手写实现
12-09
https://blog.csdn.net/qq_18983205/article/details/83745035 对应代码
Android热修复——Tinker源码分析
Memory_of_the_wind的博客
02-20 528
从Tinker的官方文档上可以看到，接入Tinker是在Application中，所以切入点就从Application开始； public class TinkerApplication extends Application { private ApplicationLike tinkerApplicationLike; @Override public void o...
Android热修复技术-Tinker源码分析
walk的博客
12-11 394
一、使用Patch合成新的dex 我们收到后台返回的补丁包后合成调用的是如下代码： TinkerInstaller.onReceiveUpgradePatch(getApplicationContext(), Environment.getExternalStorageDirectory().getAbsolutePath() + "/patch_signed_7zip.apk"); Envi...
Android开发—— 热修复Tinker源码浅析
关于Android开发的一些技术点总结 ╮(￣▽￣”)╭
02-28 1616
热修复这项技术，基本上已经成为Android项目比较重要的模块了。主要因为项目在上线之后，都难免会有各种问题，而依靠发版去修复问题，成本太高了。 现在热修复的技术基本上有阿里的AndFix、QZone的方案、美团提出的思想方案以及腾讯的Tinker等。 其中AndFix可能接入是最简单的一个（和Tinker命令行接入方式差不多），不过AndFix兼容性有一定的问题，QZone方案对性能会有一定的影响
tinker源码研读（一）：补丁生成之DexDiff原理简析
专注Android开发
02-10 1204
前言 微信的热修复框架Tinker已经在国庆节之前开源了，成为了http://github.com/Tecent下第一个项目，刷爆了各位开发者的朋友圈。作为一个超级APP的HotFix库，Tinker不仅值得我们compile，更值得我们read。 原理 Tinker和以往的HotFix库思路不太一样，它更像是APP的增量更新，在服务器端通过差异性算法，计算出新旧dex之间的差异包，推送到客
tinker源码下载
最新发布
01-01
要下载tinker的源码，首先需要进入tinker的GitHub仓库。在GitHub上搜索tinker，找到它的官方仓库，可以找到tinker的源码并下载。 点击进入tinker的GitHub仓库后，找到“Clone or download”按钮，点击后会出现一个...
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

个

红包个数最小为10个

元

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43元 前往充值 >
需支付：10.00元
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付元
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明：

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币，按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载，可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值