dovecot editheader 扩展增加自己的邮件头

为什么80%的码农都做不了架构师？>>>   

.dovecot 规则 相应的扩展 参考 http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve

里面有说明 editheader 默认没有启用

首先 90-sieve.conf 里面要启用editheader

sieve_extensions = +editheader

# 邮件内容包含 Content-Disposition: attachment 时增加X-Has-Attach: yes否则no
# 需要考虑的是邮件内容为明文则包含该内容时会命中该规则，如已有X-Has-Attach 也会再添加一次，可以判断修改规则
require ["body","editheader"];

    if body :raw :contains "Content-Disposition: attachment"
    {
        addheader "X-Has-Attach" "yes";
    }
    else
    {
        addheader "X-Has-Attach" "no";
    }

另一个稍完整一点的，通过mime来判断

# 会先判断是否有X-Has-Attach，有则先删除再增加
require [  "mime","editheader"];    

     if header :mime :param "filename" :matches ["Content-Type", "Content-Disposition"] ["*.*"]
     {
        if header :contains "X-Has-Attach" "yes"
        {
            deleteheader :index 1 "X-Has-Attach";
            addheader "X-Has-Attach" "yes";
        }
        else
        {
            addheader "X-Has-Attach" "yes";
        }
     
     }
     else
     {
        if header :contains "X-Has-Attach" "no"
        {
            deleteheader :index 1 "X-Has-Attach";
            addheader "X-Has-Attach" "no";
        }
        else
        {
            addheader "X-Has-Attach" "no";
        }
     }

测试了下，通过不同的客户端的，会有误判的情况，根据上面文档改成下面的准确性要高一些，目前测试还未出现误判

require ["editheader", "mime"];
    
    #if allof ( 
    #    header :mime :anychild :contenttype "Content-Type" "application/octet-stream",
    #    header :mime :anychild :contenttype "Content-Disposition" "attachment")

     if header :mime :anychild :contenttype "Content-Disposition" "attachment"

    {
       addheader "X-Has-Attach" "yes";
    }
    else
    {
       addheader "X-Has-Attach" "no";
    }

转载于:https://my.oschina.net/hxily/blog/807277