Ive got one simple question. Normally I write code like this:
String myString = "hello";
for (int i=0, i<10; i++)
{
myString = "hello again";
}
Because I think the following would not be good style cause it would create too many unnecessary objects.
for (int i=0, i<10; i++)
{
String myString = "hello again";
}
Is this even correct? Or is this just the case when Ive got an explicit object like an object from a class I created? What if it was a boolean or an int? What is better coding style? Instantiate it once before the loop and use it in the loop or instantiate it every time in the loop again? And why? Because the program is faster or less storage is used or...?
Some one told me, if it was a boolean I should instantiate it directly in the loop. He said it would not make a difference for the heap and it would be more clear that the variable belongs inside the loop. So what is correct?
Thanks for an answer! :-)
====
Thanks for all your answers!
In conclusion: it is preferable to declare an object inside the smallest scope possible. There are no performance improvements by declaring and instantiating objects outside the loop, even if in every looping the object is reinstantiated.
解决方案
No, the latter code isn't actually valid. It would be with braces though:
for (int i=0; i<10; i++)
{
String myString = "hello again";
}
(Basically you can't use a variable declaration as a single-statement body for an if statement, a loop etc.)
It would be pointless, but valid - and preferable to the first version, IMO. It takes no more memory, but it's generally a good idea to give your local variables the narrowest scope you can, declaring as late as you can, ideally initializing at the same point. It makes it clearer where each variable can be used.
Of course, if you need to refer to the variable outside the loop (before or afterwards) then you'll need to declare it outside the loop too.
You need to differentiate between variables and objects when you consider efficiency. The above code uses at most one object - the String object referred to by the literal "hello again".