java构造函数后面大括号,用大括号调用构造函数

Simple question about C++11 syntaxis. There is a sample code (reduced one from source)

struct Wanderer

{

explicit Wanderer(std::vector<:function>> & update_loop)

{

update_loop.emplace_back([this](float dt) { update(dt); });

}

void update(float dt);

};

int main()

{

std::vector<:function>> update_loop;

Wanderer wanderer{update_loop}; // why {} ???

}

I'd like to know, how it can be possible call constructor with curly brackets like Wanderer wanderer{update_loop}; It is neither initializer list, nor uniform initialization. What's the thing is this?

解决方案

It is neither initializer list, nor uniform initialization. What's the thing is this?

Your premise is wrong. It is uniform initialization and, in Standardese terms, direct-brace-initialization.

Unless a constructor accepting an std::initializer_list is present, using braces for constructing objects is equivalent to using parentheses.

The advantage of using braces is that the syntax is immune to the Most Vexing Parse problem:

struct Y { };

struct X

{

X(Y) { }

};

// ...

X x1(Y()); // MVP: Declares a function called x1 which returns

// a value of type X and accepts a function that

// takes no argument and returns a value of type Y.

X x2{Y()}; // OK, constructs an object of type X called x2 and

// provides a default-constructed temporary object

// of type Y in input to X's constructor.

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值