mysql null查询速度_为什么这个mysql查询（用null检查）是这么慢这个其他吗？

I getting in doubt with "IS NULL" MySQL check. I have this 2 queries. The first one runs in about 300 seconds. The second one run less then 1 second!

Slow query:

SELECT count(distinct(u.id))

FROM ips_usuario AS u

JOIN ips_fatura AS f

ON ((u.id = f.ips_usuario_id) OR

(u.ips_usuario_id_titular IS NOT NULL AND

u.ips_usuario_id_titular = f.ips_usuario_id));

Fast query:

SELECT count(distinct(u.id))

FROM ips_usuario AS u

JOIN ips_fatura AS f

ON ((u.id = f.ips_usuario_id) OR

(u.ips_usuario_id_titular = f.ips_usuario_id));

All join conditions use foreign keys indexed columns. The table ips_usuario have about 20.000 records and the table ips_fatura have about 500.000 records.

解决方案

I am surprised that either is fast. I would suggest replacing them with exists:

SELECT COUNT(*)

FROM ips_usuario u

WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ips_fatura f WHERE u.id = f.ips_usuario_id) OR

EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ips_fatura f WHERE u.ips_usuario_id_titular = f.ips_usuario_id);

And for the second:

SELECT COUNT(*)

FROM ips_usuario u

WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ips_fatura f WHERE u.id = f.ips_usuario_id) OR

(u.ips_usuario_id_titular IS NOT NULL AND

EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ips_fatura f WHERE u.ips_usuario_id_titular = f.ips_usuario_id)

)

For both these, you want two indexes: ips_fatura(ips_usuario_id) and ips_fatura(ips_usuario_id_titular). You can check the explain to be sure that EXISTS is using the index. If not, the newer releases of MySQL use indexes for IN:

SELECT COUNT(*)

FROM ips_usuario u

WHERE u.id IN (SELECT f.ips_usuario_id FROM ips_fatura f) OR

u.ips_usuario_id_titular IN (SELECT f.ips_usuario_id FROM ips_fatura f);

In either case (EXISTS or IN) the goal is to do a "semi-join". That is, to only fine the first row with a match rather than all matches. This is an important efficiency, because it allows the query to avoid duplication removal.

I would speculate that the issue is the optimization of the or -- usually this results in inefficient JOIN algorithms. However, perhaps MySQL is smart in your first case. But the addition of the IS NULL to the outer table throws it off.