[我想知道为什么立即分配2D int数组(new int[50][2])比单独分配要差,也就是说,先执行new int[50][],然后依次执行new int[2]。这是一个非专业的基准代码:public class AllocationSpeed {
private static final int ITERATION_COUNT = 1000000;
public static void main(String[] args) {
new AllocationSpeed().run();
}
private void run() {
measureSeparateAllocation();
measureAllocationAtOnce();
}
private void measureAllocationAtOnce() {
Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.createStarted();
for (int i = 0; i < ITERATION_COUNT; i++) {
allocateAtOnce();
}
stopwatch.stop();
System.out.println("Allocate at once: " + stopwatch);
}
private int allocateAtOnce() {
int[][] array = new int[50][2];
return array[10][1];
}
private void measureSeparateAllocation() {
Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.createStarted();
for (int i = 0; i < ITERATION_COUNT; i++) {
allocateSeparately();
}
stopwatch.stop();
System.out.println("Separate allocation: " + stopwatch);
}
private int allocateSeparately() {
int[][] array = new int[50][];
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i] = new int[2];
}
return array[10][1];
}
}
我在64位Linux上进行了测试,这些是使用不同64位oracle Java版本的结果:
1.6.0_45-b06:Separate allocation: 401.0 ms
Allocate at once: 1.673 s
1.7.0_45-b18Separate allocation: 408.7 ms
Allocate at once: 1.448 s
1.8.0-ea-b115Separate allocation: 380.0 ms
Allocate at once: 1.251 s
出于好奇,我也使用OpenJDK 7进行了尝试(差异较小):Separate allocation: 424.3 ms
Allocate at once: 1.072 s
对我来说,这很违反直觉,我希望一次分配会更快。