java 如何擦除所画图形,在Java中消除类型擦除

So, the group I work with has reduced the amount of code we have to type for certain things. In this case, a Spring web page that displays a list using the DisplayTag libraries. The way it's done is with a class using generics extending the Controller object, and then a subclass of that for each page it should work on.

This controller displays the SystemErrorReport, and defines the type to be the SystemErrorReportCommand.

public class SystemErrorReportController extends

GenericSearchAndSelectController {

The problem is that SystemErrorReportCommand, being passed as a type, needs to have a manual declaration of itself in its constructor, like so:

public SystemErrorReportCommand()

{

super(SystemErrorReport.class);

}

The command object is later passed to something that needs to know its explicit type. Without specifying it manually somewhere, it comes back as GenericCommand, another class of ours, because the SystemErrorReportCommand bit is lost after compile time.

I'm not thrilled with that, because it seems like something we can farther automate to reduce developer error. Is there a more elegant way to do this, or am I stuck with this because of type erasure?

解决方案

Maybe you could use something like Javassist to do some meta-programming.

It's used in Tapestry for that purpose, see this article.

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值