文章探讨了配置为16G16核的服务器上，使用PHP5.3.3开启opcache的Phppoem2.0在高并发7500的情况下，每秒处理请求的速度（7836.84 req/s）相较于ThinkPHP 5.0（4223.45 req/s）和3.2（2123.94 req/s）的性能优势。文中详细列出了响应时间和数据传输速率，对比展示了不同框架的性能差异。
服务器配置为 16G 16核，php5.3.3开启opcache，使用压测工具ab测试
PhpPoem 2.0 并发 7500 持续10s，结果 7836.84 req/s ：ab -c7500 -t10 http://www.test.com/
Requests per second: 7836.84 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 957.019 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.128 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 1642.15 [Kbytes/sec] received
相比其他框架：
Thinkphp 5.0ab -c4000 -t10 http://www.test.com/tp5/public/index.php
Requests per second: 4223.45 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 947.092 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.237 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 3877.09 [Kbytes/sec] received
Thinkphp 3.2ab -c2500 -t5 http://www.test.com/tp3/index.php
Requests per second: 2123.94 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 1177.060 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.471 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 1996.86 [Kbytes/sec] received
扫一扫
3698
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
