文件表五百多万行数据,起初没有索引,执行 SELECT COUNT(*) FROM file; 速度极慢,大概二十几秒。
后来为 filename 和 size 添加了普通索引,SELECT COUNT(*) FROM file; 查询只需要不到1秒,使用 idx_size 索引。
又为 id 添加了唯一索引,查询时间依旧不到1s,索引改用 unq_id
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM file; 使用 PRIMARY 索引效率为啥这么低?那么以后需要 COUNT(*) 的表是否都为主键添加唯一索引会比较好?文件表结构FieldTypeNullKeyExtra
idint(11)NOPRIauto_increment
filenamevarchar(255)NO
sizebigint(20) unsignedNOMUL没有建立任何索引时,查询时间是23秒,使用PRIMARY索引:mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE COUNT(*) FROM pan_file;
+----------+
| COUNT(*) |
+----------+
| 5416697 |
+----------+
1 row in set (23.39 sec)
mysql> explain SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE COUNT(*) FROM pan_file;
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | pan_file | NULL | index | NULL | PRIMARY | 4 | NULL | 4806466 | 100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.07 sec)给 filename 和 size 添加了普通索引后,查询时间降为0.95s,使用 idx_size 索引mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE COUNT(*) FROM pan_file;
+----------+
| COUNT(*) |
+----------+
| 5416697 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.95 sec)
mysql> explain SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE COUNT(*) FROM pan_file;
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | pan_file | NULL | index | NULL | idx_size | 8 | NULL | 4806466 | 100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.06 sec)又为 id 添加了唯一索引,查询速度为 0.90s,索引改用 unq_idmysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE COUNT(*) FROM pan_file;
+----------+
| COUNT(*) |
+----------+
| 5416697 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.90 sec)
mysql> explain SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE COUNT(*) FROM pan_file;
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+--------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+--------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | pan_file | NULL | index | NULL | unq_id | 4 | NULL | 4806466 | 100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+--------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.06 sec)