java.lang.boolean,java.lang.Boolean的到scala.Boolean问题

georgii@gleontiev:~$ scala

Welcome to Scala version 2.8.1.final (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.6.0_24).

Type in expressions to have them evaluated.

Type :help for more information.

scala> val jbool = java.lang.Boolean.TRUE

jbool: java.lang.Boolean = true

scala> val sbool = true

sbool: Boolean = true

scala> def sboolMethod(sbool: Boolean) = print("got scala.Boolean " + sbool)

sboolMethod: (sbool: Boolean)Unit

scala> sboolMethod(sbool)

got scala.Boolean true

scala> sboolMethod(jbool)

:9: error: type mismatch;

found : java.lang.Boolean

required: scala.Boolean

sboolMethod(jbool)

^

scala> implicit def jbool2sbool(bool: java.lang.Boolean): scala.Boolean = bool.booleanValue

jbool2sbool: (bool: java.lang.Boolean)Boolean

scala> sboolMethod(jbool)

got scala.Boolean true

The question is: why isn't there a default implicit conversion from java.lang.Boolean to scala.Boolean? The question also stands for java.lang.Long vs scala.Long and probably other standard types (haven't tried all of them).

解决方案

In 2.9, there is such a conversion, presumably to aid interoperability with Java. (Scala doesn't need it on its own, because it transparently boxes and unboxes primitives, which is perhaps why it wasn't included earlier.)

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值