楼主,这个问题不光只有你有的,很多人都有,而且老外做过比较专业的测试,业内人士也普遍认为,DD 640kbps ,DD+ 1.5mbps,DTS 1.5mbps和原始的没压缩过的母带之间基本是听不出差别来的。老外的测试你可以看
http://www.hemagazine.com/node/D ... us_Uncompressed_PCM
这个测试是在Dolby和DTS的听音室里面做的,素材绝对来自是相同的母带,Dolby所有的元数据管理都关掉,比如DRC,要比较不同,一定要保证是相同的混音母带,否则没有任何的意义
Next, we compared the original to the Dolby Digital Plus version (that codec is found on numerous BD titles, and like TrueHD, is fully backward compatible with regular Dolby Digital decoders). Even on this extremely high-end system, we couldn’t hear any difference between the uncompressed and the compressed. Then, we compared the higher bitrate (640 kbps) that is found on the Dolby Digital tracks on Blu-rays to the original. "Golden Ears" Morrison was able to hear the difference, but I, and most others in the room with us, did not. Each of us had our turn in the prime listening chair, and couldn’t know the origin of the clips or their order of presentation.
The shocker came when we compared the lower 448 kbps Dolby Digital DVD bitrate to the original. There was an audible difference, but it was only ever-so-slightly noticeable (and this is with a high end audio system in an acoustically controlled environment that is so far beyond what typical home theater systems are capable of resolving). There was just the slightest decrease in presence with the DD version, not exactly a softening of the sound, but just a tad less ambience and a similarly small tightening of the front soundstage’s depth