java开源线程测试_JAVA多线程性能测试

[用到gprof时才知道，原来gprof只能对主线程统计耗时。manual上也没写线程相关的问题啊？不过有现成的解决方案：http://sam.zoy.org/writings/programming/gprof.html该方

import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;

public class Test {

public static void main(String[] args) {

int num = 100000;

test1(num);

test2(num);

}

private static void test1(int max) {

long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

int n = method1(max);

long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("method1: value=" + n + ",time=" + (t2 - t1)

/ 1000.0);

}

private static int method1(int max) {

int num = 0;

for (int i = 1; i <= max; i++) {

boolean flag = true;

for (int j = 2; j < i - 1; j++) {

if (i % j == 0) {

flag = false;

break;

}

}

if (flag && i > num)

num = i;

}

return num;

}

private static int method2(int max) {

int num = 0;

for (int i = 1; i <= max; i++) {

boolean flag = true;

for (int j = 2; j < i - 1; j++) {

if (i % j == 0) {

flag = false;

break;

}

}

if (flag && i > num)

num = i;

}

return num;

}

private static void test2(int max) {

long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

int threadNumber = 20;//线程数，[1. 测试环境jmeter版本 ：jmeter 2.4grinder的版本 ： Grinder 3JAVA的版本：JDK 1.62. 测试代码Jmeter测试代码public class Sampler { publ在我的机器上20个线程效果最佳

final CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(threadNumber);

int step = max / threadNumber;

for (int i = 0; i <= max; i += step) {

if (i - step >= 0) {

Calc calc = new Calc(i - step + 1, i, countDownLatch);

Thread thread = new Thread(calc);

thread.start();

}

}

try {

countDownLatch.await();

} catch (InterruptedException e) {

e.printStackTrace();

}

long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("method2: value=" + Calc.getVal() + ",time="

+ (t2 - t1) / 1000.0);

}

}

class Calc implements Runnable {

private static Integer val = 0;

private int min;

private int max;

private CountDownLatch cdl;

public Calc(int min, int max, CountDownLatch cdl) {

this.min = min;

this.max = max;

this.cdl = cdl;

}

public static int getVal() {

return val;

}

public void run() {

int num = 0;

for (int i = min; i <= max; i++) {

boolean flag = true;

for (int j = 2; j < i - 1; j++) {

if (i % j == 0) {

flag = false;

break;

}

}

if (flag && i > num)

num = i;

}

synchronized (val) {

if (num > val)

val = num;

}

cdl.countDown();

}

}

在我的机器上测试效果如下：

50线程

method1: value=99991,time=7.797

method2: value=99991,time=3.672

30线程

method1: value=99991,time=7.813

method2: value=99989,time=3.797

20线程

method1: value=99991,time=7.782

method2: value=99991,time=3.797

10线程

method1: value=99991,time=7.719

method2: value=99991,time=4.109

不难看出，当计算量较大时候，多线程程序可以比普通程序快80%[ 测试目的： ---------------------------------------------------------了解GraphicsMagick启用与禁用多线程(openmp)，对GraphicsMagick性能的影响 编译参数使用