我正在为AtomicInteger和AtomicBoolean编写单元测试.它们将用作参考测试,用于在
objective-c中测试这些类的仿真,以用于翻译项目.
我认为AtomicInteger测试很好,主要是通过在大量for循环中执行可预测数量的递增,递减,加法和减法操作,每个循环都在自己的线程中运行(每个操作类型有很多线程).实际操作使用CountDownLatch同时启动.
当所有线程完成后,我通过比较原子整数和预期的整数值来断言,基于线程数,每个线程的迭代次数和每次迭代的预期增加/减少.这个测试通过.
但是如何测试AtomicBoolean?基本操作是get和set,因此在许多线程中多次调用并期望最终结果为true或false似乎没有意义.我正在考虑的方向是使用两个应始终具有相反值的AtomicBooleans.像这样:
@Test
public void testAtomicity() throws Exception {
// ==== SETUP ====
final AtomicBoolean booleanA = new AtomicBoolean(true);
final AtomicBoolean booleanB = new AtomicBoolean(false);
final int threadCount = 50;
final int iterationsPerThread = 5000;
final CountDownLatch startSignalLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
final CountDownLatch threadsFinishedLatch = new CountDownLatch(threadCount);
final AtomicBoolean assertFailed = new AtomicBoolean(false);
// ==== EXECUTE: start all threads ====
for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) {
// ==== Create the thread =====
AtomicOperationsThread thread;
thread = new AtomicOperationsThread("Thread #" + i, booleanA, booleanB, startSignalLatch, threadsFinishedLatch, iterationsPerThread, assertFailed);
System.out.println("Creating Thread #" + i);
// ==== Start the thread (each thread will wait until the startSignalLatch is triggered) =====
thread.start();
}
startSignalLatch.countDown();
// ==== VERIFY: that the AtomicInteger has the expected value after all threads have finished ====
final boolean allThreadsFinished;
allThreadsFinished = threadsFinishedLatch.await(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
assertTrue("Not all threads have finished before reaching the timeout", allThreadsFinished);
assertFalse(assertFailed.get());
}
private static class AtomicOperationsThread extends Thread {
// ##### Instance variables #####
private final CountDownLatch startSignalLatch;
private final CountDownLatch threadsFinishedLatch;
private final int iterations;
private final AtomicBoolean booleanA, booleanB;
private final AtomicBoolean assertFailed;
// ##### Constructor #####
private AtomicOperationsThread(final String name, final AtomicBoolean booleanA, final AtomicBoolean booleanB, final CountDownLatch startSignalLatch, final CountDownLatch threadsFinishedLatch, final int iterations, final AtomicBoolean assertFailed) {
super(name);
this.booleanA = booleanA;
this.booleanB = booleanB;
this.startSignalLatch = startSignalLatch;
this.threadsFinishedLatch = threadsFinishedLatch;
this.iterations = iterations;
this.assertFailed = assertFailed;
}
// ##### Thread implementation #####
@Override
public void run() {
super.run();
// ==== Wait for the signal to start (so all threads are executed simultaneously) =====
try {
System.out.println(this.getName() + " has started. Awaiting startSignal.");
startSignalLatch.await(); /* Awaiting start signal */
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("The startSignalLatch got interrupted.", e);
}
// ==== Perform the atomic operations =====
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
final boolean booleanAChanged;
booleanAChanged = booleanA.compareAndSet(!booleanB.get(), booleanB.getAndSet(booleanA.get())); /* Set A to the current value of B if A is currently the opposite of B, then set B to the current value of A */
if (!booleanAChanged){
assertFailed.set(true);
System.out.println("Assert failed in thread: " + this.getName());
}
}
// ==== Mark this thread as finished =====
threadsFinishedLatch.countDown();
}
}
这适用于一个线程,但失败了多个.我想这是因为booleanAChanged = booleanA.compareAndSet(!booleanB.get(),booleanB.getAndSet(booleanA.get()));不是一个原子操作.
有什么建议?